RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Kim Davis

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Kim Davis | Result: Moved to Conscientious objector to same-sex marriage Same-sex marriage resistance[edit]

Kim Davis (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. Literally 15 minutes of shame. in a year or two this article will be just as stubby and few will remember she exists, just like what happened to our Joe the Plumber article. At best a mention in our Gay Marriage articles US section for post-ruling resistance would be required for her. "Paravant" Talk & Contribs 23:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  2. I created this article because I thought it was relevant, and I think there's a chance she's gonna be more than just 15 minutes. Nevertheless, I would support moving the article text to the article about same-sex marriage. Spaceboyjosh (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
  3. Yes. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 14:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. I highly support working on this article and making it into a snark goldmine. There's more than plenty of news sources on this woman and her antics (perhaps oddly). I mean, come on. She acted injustly and beyond moronical for the sole reason that the woman is so religious, she can't even tell the difference between her ass and a hole in the ground. Though it's possible she could be baked into a gay rights article without problem, which I'd also support. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  2. Move to a suitable name. From the to-do list, there's at least slight interest. Also, she's still looking for stuff to fuck up, this isn't over - David Gerard (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
  3. <-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (pretentious, unwarranted self importance) (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
  4. Agree with David. Not over, still ongoing - keep for now. --Castaigne (talk) 16:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
  5. Keep for now, we do this kind of stuff - Cliven Bundy is another example. Whether the topic has legs is a matter for the future. BicyclewheelModerator 18:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  6. Keep. She's a religious fanatic who think her religious views should exempt her from certain regular duties of a public official. That's exactly the sort of thing this wiki should cover.---Mona- (talk) 23:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Goat[edit]