RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Kim Davis

Kim Davis | Result: Moved to Conscientious objector to same-sex marriage Same-sex marriage resistance

Kim Davis (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Literally 15 minutes of shame. in a year or two this article will be just as stubby and few will remember she exists, just like what happened to our Joe the Plumber article. At best a mention in our Gay Marriage articles US section for post-ruling resistance would be required for her. "Paravant" ^{Talk & Contribs} 23:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
2. I created this article because I thought it was relevant, and I think there's a chance she's gonna be more than just 15 minutes. Nevertheless, I would support moving the article text to the article about same-sex marriage. Spaceboyjosh (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
3. Yes. FuzzyCatPotato of the Sanctimonious Filibusters (talk/stalk) 14:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep

1. I highly support working on this article and making it into a snark goldmine. There's more than plenty of news sources on this woman and her antics (perhaps oddly). I mean, come on. She acted injustly and beyond moronical for the sole reason that the woman is so religious, she can't even tell the difference between her ass and a hole in the ground. Though it's possible she could be baked into a gay rights article without problem, which I'd also support. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
2. Move to a suitable name. From the to-do list, there's at least slight interest. Also, she's still looking for stuff to fuck up, this isn't over - David Gerard (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
3. <-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (pretentious, unwarranted self importance) (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
4. Agree with David. Not over, still ongoing - keep for now. --Castaigne (talk) 16:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
5. Keep for now, we do this kind of stuff - Cliven Bundy is another example. Whether the topic has legs is a matter for the future. Bicycle^wheel 18:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
6. Keep. She's a religious fanatic who think her religious views should exempt her from certain regular duties of a public official. That's exactly the sort of thing this wiki should cover.---Mona- (talk) 23:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Goat

• I think we should probably have an article about the specific controversy that made her momentarily famous, though. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 23:41, 25 September 42015 AQD (UTC)

  I'd not be opposed to that either--"Paravant" ^{Talk & Contribs} 23:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  ^ That. This has also happened in other countries by the way (although in a less ... crazy way, AFAIK) Carpetsmoker (talk) 04:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

  I'm with this idea. --Castaigne (talk) 22:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

  Or, an article about people refusing to do their optional job, when accommodation should be made, and when it shouldn't. Merged with the ideas of pharmacist and cashier who have to scan pork.
  —The Great and Humble Shawn (the Humanist)^{Talk to me} 12:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

  I agree with this. She isn't the only one, not even the only one in Kentucky. In Kentucky, there's also clerks Casey Davis (unrelated) and Kay Schwartz. ^{— Unsigned, by: Bongolian / talk / contribs}

  Can anyone think of a good name for such a page? Conscientious objector to gay marriage or Conscientious objections to gay marriage is a bit of a mouthful, but the best I can think of... Carpetsmoker (talk) 05:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

  Gay Marriage opposition? Gay Marriage Reactionary?--"Paravant" ^{Talk & Contribs} 05:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

• Should be rewritten without liberal bias. She's just practicing her religious beliefs, I support gays but they could go elsewhere. <-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (pretentious, unwarranted self importance) (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

  Much of the content on this site has a "liberal bias"... Carpetsmoker (talk) 22:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

  Which is why I prefer Conservapedia. <-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (administrator) (system operator) (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

  Lol. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 22:53, 28 September 42015 AQD (UTC)

  Should be rewritten without a reality bias. She's just practicing her hypocrisy. Bongolian (talk) 08:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)