There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/New Apologetics
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New Apologetics | Result: Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Until cites, not worth it. Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 07:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Die die die die die die die die Blacke (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Seems to be a valid, vaguely missional subject. Just need cites and snark.--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 07:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- As the Orwellite above says, it's missional, it just needs expansion. Cites and examples especially. Bicyclewheel
08:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Orwellite? Uncertain if compliment. FuzzyCatPotato of the Hairless Candlesticks (talk/stalk) 09:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- WP:The Road to Wigan Pier. Bicyclewheel
09:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Be thankful I am not Keeping Aspidistras Flying (much).--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 09:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Just as long as you Come Up For Air once in a while.
- Be thankful I am not Keeping Aspidistras Flying (much).--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 09:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- WP:The Road to Wigan Pier. Bicyclewheel
- Orwellite? Uncertain if compliment. FuzzyCatPotato of the Hairless Candlesticks (talk/stalk) 09:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- A trivial Google search for "new apologetics" shows the applicability and missionality. Mediocre stub, but clearly on-mission - David Gerard (talk) 12:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Google easily provides sources for this article. This is exactly the type of group we mean to cover. This article just needs moar work. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- This is the type of group that RationalWiki was created to expose. Just needs expansion with sources. Tuxer (talk) 00:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- For the reasons listed above. Carpetsmoker (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- I would like to plead for a two-day stay of execution. It's a phrase that doesn't really describe a well-unified movement, and I'll admit that what's there now is crap, BUT it's a missional subject that can be salvaged/written for real. I meant to the other day but life plus other RW stoofs of interest. WalkerWalkerWalker 08:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Agree. Sometimes articles take time to develop. - Smerdis of Tlön, LOAD "*", 8, 1. 02:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Jerboa[edit]
- Shouldn't we generally have a longer interval between the nomination for deletion and the actual wiping off the face off the wiki of a certain topic? Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's supposed to be a week? Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 03:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- There's a divide between nominal and actual. It tends to be defined by everyone going "Seriously? This is garbage" dogpiling the first day. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 18:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Dogpiling is basically RW's speedy delete template. Heh. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 22:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- There's a divide between nominal and actual. It tends to be defined by everyone going "Seriously? This is garbage" dogpiling the first day. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 18:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's supposed to be a week? Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 03:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)