RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/NotPoliticallyCorrect
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
NotPoliticallyCorrect | Result: Keep[edit]
Delete[edit]
- According to the owner of the blog, and someone else the article was written by Michael Coombs impersonating an ANTIFA (ANTIFAGuy); also user "RaceRealist88" was an impersonation of notpoliticallycorrect, likely also Mike. Despite being a neo-Nazi himself, Mike has spats with other Nazis/white nationalists, then he uses this wiki to attack them while pretending to be ANTIFA.EvilGremlin (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- None of that makes a compelling case to delete the article. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Non-notability? It's a random white nationalist/racialist whose only internet presence is a blog and Twitter profile. The article creator only made the article because he had a quarrel or minor dispute with him. Btw, Mike created a RationalWiki article on me, but it was quickly deleted. Pretty much anyone who debates Michael Coombs online he then creates articles on either here, Encylopedia Dramatica or his Nazi-wiki Rightpedia.EvilGremlin (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- A lot of articles on people we make here are "random white nationalist/racialists". Where are the guidelines that decide who is "notable" or not? in this category, how many names do you recognize? БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 20:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- The article doesn't seem bad to me, so it doesn't really matter whether or not Mikemikev wrote it. սպրիգգինա (խոսել) (ներդրումներ) @ 21:35, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Non-notability? It's a random white nationalist/racialist whose only internet presence is a blog and Twitter profile. The article creator only made the article because he had a quarrel or minor dispute with him. Btw, Mike created a RationalWiki article on me, but it was quickly deleted. Pretty much anyone who debates Michael Coombs online he then creates articles on either here, Encylopedia Dramatica or his Nazi-wiki Rightpedia.EvilGremlin (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- None of that makes a compelling case to delete the article. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- It's missional and we have plenty of articles about people who aren't notable here. սպրիգգինա (խոսել) (ներդրումներ) @ 23:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- Wait, do you want it deleted or not? —Kazitor, pending 05:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Kazitor Check the deletion log. FuzzyCatPotato deleted the page, then Spriggina restored it and opened an AfD. CowHouse (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Wait, do you want it deleted or not? —Kazitor, pending 05:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Definitely keep. It's missional and has enough content to stand on. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 20:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter who created it. This page has subsequently been edited by some of our most trusted editors and looks to me like one of our better articles on the alt-right. Spud (talk) 13:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- I'll add my vote to the keep camp. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Cosmikdebris (talk) 22:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
Goat[edit]
- Why does the result say "not notable"? CowHouse (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- @CowHouse Maybe someone misread "result" as "reason"? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)