2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $10064.65Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Three Arrows

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Three Arrows | Result: Deleted[edit]

Three Arrows (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. It's a YouTube stub that's pretty much going nowhere, It's pretty much a puff piece and should've been a part of the great YouTube purge. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snoot 17:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  2. Another YouTube article about a channel no one cares about. GeeJayK (talk) 17:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
    it's a good channel and I care about it. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 01:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
  3. Boring filler.𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 (𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰) (𝔰𝔠𝔯𝔦𝔭𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔞) 17:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
    it's a good channel. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 01:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
  4. I'm surprised that this one evaded the Great YouTube Purge. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 18:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  5. I think it survived for being undiscovered. Andrew5 (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  6. Youtube. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 22:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

  1. Keep for the time being, the channel is inactive but it covers debunking pseudo-history. As for no one caring, I suppose if you didn't use YouTube or Twitter that would be true, but meh, a resource is a resource. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  2. Short article doesn't mean delete. This guy is like Shaun; the YouTuber is a good resource, and he has a healthy amount of subscribers and views despite being an inactive channel. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 01:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
    Honestly, I'm not sure that needs an article, but I won't go through the trouble of AFD'ing it.Andrew5 (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Merge/redirect[edit]

Goat[edit]

  • Normally talk pages aren't deleted, but since this just says {{person}}, would it possibly be deleted if the article is? Andrew5 (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
    No. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 20:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Y'all are just taking a cursory glance and deciding delete because it's a small article and only because it's YouTube. The content the YouTuber makes can make for a really good resource for our articles. Just look at his uploads. For instance, his video "Fox News: How To Whitewash an Atrocity" can be used as a starting material for Blackwater which I've actually used the links from that video to supplement the Blackwater article. It's not "boring", it's actually quite engaging, and the video itself has a plethora of resources to share. Why the hell would you want to saw off potential material for the wiki just because it's on a medium you don't like? The article is small (and why call it a "puffpiece", like, should we make up criticism for this guy if we can't find serious criticism?), so what? Just leave it if you can't find time to expand it. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 01:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)