RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive60

I think Grawp might be Rationalzombie94

I'm a regular observer of RationalWiki, and I've noticed a disturbing similarity between Rationalzombie94 and Grawp: They're both always babbling about Pensacola Christian College and similar fundie schools, almost to the point of obsession. I haven't said anything because I haven't wanted to get in the middle of it, but I can't ignore that Rationalzombie94 posted about apparently having bi-polar disorder. I hate to sound like a dirtbag singling out someone with a mental disorder, but from personally knowing how bi-polar works (extreme mood swings, causing someone to act almost like a completely different person at times), this strongly supports my already existing suspicions. Grawp has also talked about having an administrator account here, and if Rationalzombie94 = Grawp, that would make Grawp's claim true. Is there anyway a checkuser can look into this? Luker the Turker (talk) 20:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Having multiple accounts on RW is not a violation of our rules, @Luker the Turker, and it is certainly not worth bothering about here in the coop. Stop trying to do a doxing. Bongolian (talk) 20:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

You do realize that Grawp is one of the worst vandals on RW, right? Someone like that shouldn't have editing privileges, much less sysop privileges. What does @Christopher think of this? Luker the Turker (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Grawp has been perma-banned since 3 years ago. Why are you bringing this up now? Let's set aside any possible similarity between the two accounts. What specific editing issues do you have with Rationalzombie94? If there are none, then there is no case to be made. Bongolian (talk) 20:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Christopher (talk) 20:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 21:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Another Fucking^{And don't bother whining about it} Vandalbin appeal

So can I fucking get unbinned? You might as well tell me bullshit I did to get here anyways. Oh come on, Fuzzy and Percy, is my behavior goddamn sufficient enough? And no, I'm afraid I have no use of a "real" war here; what did you fools want me to do, explode into a rage and get banned? K0rnsbl0d^fight

You have made about five contributions to the site since New Year's 2017, only one of which (the Alt-Lite suggestion) has been constructive. Could you do a few more edits to mainspace? Also, Percy isn't around here much anymore. Perhaps if you turned to She Who Thirsts, your case could be further considered... RoninMacbeth (talk) 04:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

I don't think hardly anyone remembers your past sins, so it's pretty much up to @FuzzyCatPotato to de-bin you. Bongolian (talk) 05:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

"You might as well tell me bullshit I did to get here anyways." You were blocked for "Spamming user talk pages repeatedly after being warned". Reverend Black Percy gave you the benefit of the doubt and unblocked you, before placing you in the vandal bin instead.

Specifically, these are the comments you spammed . I acknowledge that your comments to JorisEnter were justified as a direct response to this.

To your credit, you haven't spammed anyone's talk page since being vandal binned and your other contributions on non-talk pages all seemed fine. CowHouse (talk) 05:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, and I promised to stop spamming when warned and those fucks used the hammer anyway. Maim!Kill!Burn! (talk) 22:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

In my opinion, if you're serious about being unbinned, I highly recommend less vitriolic, more straight-forward language even if you're frustrated. That way, the emotion doesn't cloud your language and makes discussion and resolving your problem easier. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 22:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Fine, I guess rage can only take me so far then. You might as well just tell those admins to apologize for a premature banning of me. Seriously though, I can't do much of a thing while in this vandalbin anyways. What, I need to bring another Inquisitor? I am for all purposes, already a butthurt moron here, so the least thing that could be done is to see if I'm worthy for a lift. Geez, all I'm saying is that I could contribute much more if I wasn't in some damn vandalbin. Last time I checked, this wasn't some Conservapedia ripoff. Maim!Kill!Burn!^fight

I do guess it's a while ago, and I don't think your past actions are too excessive. I think you can be unbinned though, but I'm not the one who makes the decision. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 22:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

@FuzzyCatPotato-💎📀1️⃣ (talk) 00:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Should K0rnsbl0d be unbinned?

Yes	11	Vote
No	5	Vote

-💎📀1️⃣ (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

I say yes and if K0rnsbl0d acts up again, do a perma-ban.—チーズバーガー • めん  (talk • stalk) 01:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Also voted yes, but I think a perma-ban is a bit too harsh tbh. He's not an obvious vandal or anything. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓^(T|C) 01:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

I didn't say IP ban. In my view, if you ban-evade and don't act like you're previous self (e.g. don't act like an asshat), who is to know you are ban evading?—チーズバーガー • めん  (talk • stalk) 01:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

A threat of a perma-ban seems unnecessary. CowHouse (talk) 11:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

I don't see what the big deal about permaban is, after all we don't ban the person, we ban the account/behavior. If the same person wants to create a new account and behave themselves in a reasonable manner, there's nothing to stop that from happening. Bongolian (talk) 02:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)