User talk:207.67.17.45

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, anonymous editor! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun! While you are free to continue to edit as, and be identified by, your IP address, you might prefer to create an account (they're free!), or log in if you already have one. If you create an account, your IP address will not be displayed and you will face fewer editing restrictions.

Well, you've told us about you. Now what about RationalWiki? 16:17, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

*sniffs website* We do not smell like stale incense and old sweat! :' ( Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 17:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Your contention that the user lies (that you lie) is illogical. Please make more sense. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 19:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Jeff G., I'm assuming that your comment is directed at User:SusanG? If not, please feel free to clarify. 207.67.17.45 (talk) 19:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

This smell reminds me of the Galway bogs.  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 19:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

User 207.67.17.45 (if that IS your real name), what lies are we talking about? Jimaginator (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

No, it was directed at you, 207.67.17.45, concerning your user page 207.67.17.45, which at the time implied that you lie by saying "Lies".   — Jeff G. ツ 02:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Germany

Ok, BON, I read your reference, and now I "get it." But imagine how that sentence will look next week, when nobody fucking remembers some dipshit comment Andy made on the news feed. It will just read like poor meta-satire of Nazi-baiting, not very funny and clogging up the lead. Junggai (talk) 14:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. Jack Hughes (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. It just seemed rude that you hastily reverted it as being 1) unfunny and 2) vandalism. 207.67.17.45 (talk) 15:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

OK, so maybe we should have Assumed Good Faith. Let's all chalk it up as one of those misunderstandings. Jack Hughes (talk) 15:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Gladly. Thanks. 207.67.17.45 (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Winner

--194.197.235.240 (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC)