User talk:Bohdan2

Your account has been blocked per your request. If you would like this reversed, just ask (and I won't make you chat with me for more time than you want on IM.). Heart♥Gold^{Jump up and down} 23:48, 29 July 2007 (CDT)

Creative name. GdlessLiberal 14:02, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

What are we to do with you??? Ten new user accounts in as many seconds?-αmεσ (decider) 00:47, 22 February 2008 (EST)

It wasn't me. It was RA. Bohdan2 00:47, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Nay! 'Twas me! -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   00:50, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Then who are you? Bohdan2 00:51, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Clearly, I am me. What kind of question is that? Are you some sort of Satan-worshipping existentialist? -- ^{ni eb}namuħ   00:53, 22 February 2008 (EST)

I am a sock of AmesG. So no. Bohdan2 00:54, 22 February 2008 (EST)

I am my own sock.-αmεσ (decider) 00:57, 22 February 2008 (EST)

True. Bohdan2 00:59, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Shenanigans

Bohdan, could you not shit on a newcomer's talk page for a change? It drives them away. Don't complain about us being "just like Conservapedia" if all you do is try to fuck up the experience for the rest of us. -- Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:28, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Your going to have to be more clear. Bohdan2 21:29, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Besides, we all know you're MexMax. And Andy. And Samwell. And Richard.-αmεσ (decider) 21:56, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Userbox

But naturally, your userbox would offend me, so you must take it down. We can't have people just saying things with impugnity :P _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 00:56, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

Ordinarily...

Ordinarily I would let you wreak havok to your heart's content, but I don't know what TMT/new2 actually does, so I don't know how much damage your whimsicle reversions could cause. Peace. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 20:31, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

HUMAN'S UNBLOCKED!??!

I forgot about that. Can I get some of that sweet sweet lovin? I've moderated in my old age. I can has unblock? I'll... uh... do stuff if you let me back... fun stuff. Yeah... and I won't talk to Karajou. Learned that lesson 300,000x.-caius (historian) 00:18, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Human was not unblocked by me (even though we did strike a contribution deal to get him unblocked under certain conditions). Fox unblocked him a while ago. You on the other hand were recently blocked with a "will not return EXCEPT UNDER ACHLAFLY'S PLEASURE". I can ask ASchlafly now for you, if you are sincere. Bohdan2 00:20, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Sure! Could be fun. Ed Poor, unsolicited, told me a few months ago he'd unblock me under certain terms, which he then never sent to me. But make sure you tell him I won't talk to Karajou (that ought to prolong my lifetime), and that I'm really quite cute.-caius (historian) 00:26, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Me too!

I'd quite like to be unblocked at CP as well, Bohdan. And whyever not? I was blocked for almost no reason, and after having attempted in earnest to contribute to CP. Plus, you'd only be undoing a block by DanH -- you wouldn't be overturning Andy or anything like that. I also promise to stay out of any controversial subjects if allowed to return. What do you say? _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 10:52, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

I'd ask to be unblocked, too, but my account over there hasn't been blocked yet. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 11:00, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

I was actually being serious. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 11:04, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

Killjoy. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 16:28, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

Teh kitteh

I thought you'd find it interesting to know that I've forgotten to feed my cat for the past hour. It took that long to realize that the angry meows meant "your girlfriend didn't feed me, Ames," and not, "cuddle me!" Since you've previously expressed a concern for RP, I thought I should update you-caius (historian) 20:19, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

Seriously

Please consider unblocking me at CP. I want to live, Bohdan! Won't you let me live?? Sulk.^Chaos! 22:14, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Who are you again? Bohdan2 22:15, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

On CP I am Jellyfish. I was blocked under a misunderstanding. Sulk.^Chaos! 22:17, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm not certain I understand your comment -- so, since I'm logged in as a sock right now, I feel I ought to mention that I am also 85 25 151 22 and Jellyfish! and Chaos! on RW. Sulk.^Chaos! 22:20, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Hi

Hello, I left a very nonimportant message for you at User talk:Human. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 01:46, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

gnorW

_{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} .elcycirt latsyrc dezirp ruoy dessessoper ,erofereht ,evah I .nosrep gnorw eht dekcolbnu uoY

Ahem.

Anyway, I think you've grasped the point: I'm not Anders, however amusing the accusation may seem. I hope you're taking my unblocking request seriously, Bohdan... I don't want to have to sting you :P Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 18:59, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Henry! I told you I didn't want to be unblocked. I demand that you reblock me immediately. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:00, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

That's not what you told me in the emails. Bohdan2 19:01, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I gather from your conversation on AK's page that you weren't teasing me by unblocking him after all. It seems I saw the words "begging and whining" and just assumed you were talking about me. Oh well...

You can unblock me now. Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:03, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

You're not a sock of Kjeldsen? Bohdan2 19:04, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

No, he isn't! --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:05, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Don't make me ressurect my neutral pronoun campaign, Andrew. Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:05, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Sorry.

No, they aren't! --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:08, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Wrong, he's a sock of AmesG. </Sarcasm> Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:06, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

And Sid. Don't forget Sid. Maybe you guys had better rangeblock all of Europe just to be sure. I could be anyone, you know! --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:08, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

No, no Anders. What are you talking about? We know who you are. You are Anders. Who is "chaos"? Bohdan2 19:09, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I am Jellyfish + 85 + Jellyfish! + Chaos!. The one and only. Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:10, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

And thank goodness for that. This place would drown in silliness if there were more than one. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:11, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm also Rational Afikomen. Much to his dismay! Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:12, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I can certainly see why he'd feel that way. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:14, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Pretty please?

I don't know why you're ignoring my request. I'm not about to run amok and get instantly rebanned, I want to be a proper CP editor. Cut me some slack! Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:24, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

They're probably afraid to let you in. I think they're allergic to silly. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:26, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

They let Human back in! He's been silly (and critical of CP, like me) on RW for a long time, but that doesn't seem to concern Bohdan for some reason. Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:28, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh. Yes, well, I guess they're just racist against jellyfish, then. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:30, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Unblock me

Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:53, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

You were blocked for vandalism. Neither Human nor Kjeldsen were vandals. Bohdan2 19:54, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I was blocked for vandalism that I didn't do. DanH decided for some reason that I was Senex, and he made a mistake. Do you have checkuser? Is there some way you can contact Dan to see what his reasoning was? Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 19:56, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

You must admit, Henry, that the CP sysops' success rates are not exactly stellar when it comes to determine who are socks of who. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:00, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I agree with you, Sid :) Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 20:00, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Thank you, Dr. Lipson. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:03, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

OMG, don't seek clarification on a block, they might decide to ban you on a whim too! --Toiretni 20:24, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Nah, Dan's alright. Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 20:25, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Ah, go on. Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 23:01, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Keep adding spam

That's enough of an offense to justify being "vandaled". tmtoulouse ^vex 23:31, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

What? What are you trying to say? Is that Canadian talk? Bohdan2 23:32, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Allow me to demonstrate. tmtoulouse ^vex 23:32, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Fascist

Unblock me. You fascist.
Or, alternately, you could actually discuss this with me... Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 00:16, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

I don't negotiate with Ames' sock. Bohdan2 00:18, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

<confused>But I saw you speaking to PalMD just now... And Bugler, a couple of days ago</confused> Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 00:19, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Fascist (part 2)

I have more pester than you can cope with. Enter the debate, Henry! Surprise yourself! Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 00:46, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Password

Hey, Henry, don't forget to send the password for my new account. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:30, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh, by the way, this guy wasn't me either. I don't know where you guys get these things from - do you roll dice to decide on which one of us to accuse? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:57, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Who are "you guys"? I am only one person. I decided to accuse you, much like I have accused you and Ames before. What makes you think that more than one user is playing with dice? Bohdan2 18:43, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

"You guys" are of course the group os sysops at CP. There is an undeniable pattern at work here. Anyway, password? Right now I have a user account which I don't really want to use, but the fact that I can't even use it makes it strangely, unsettingly appealing. It's all very confusing. :-( --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 03:43, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Please unblock me on CP

Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 00:32, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

You cannot run forever, mooncalf. Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 00:40, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Sorry, but I don't unblock vandals. Bohdan2 00:41, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm. Not. A. Vandal.

Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 00:42, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Yes. You. Are.

You were a sock of Senex, who was banned for mass vandalism, and possibly many other users, as user has at least 15 IPs. Bohdan2 00:43, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

I've always been interested in the CP sysop delusion that all other sysops are omniscient. Tell me, Bohdan, when did you first start feeling this way? Is it rooted in your projected fear of the Danish? :P

I might also remind you that you were once blocked at CP for mistaken reasons (by your friend TK, I think). You can't seriously think that all sock allegations on CP are irrefutably true... Can you? Marginally Less Chaos!^Audacity! 00:51, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

The Dogma of Sysop Infallibility: Formulated at the Sysop Council of 2007. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 03:43, 18 July 2008 (EDT)

Holland

Um, much betters. Oh, shoot, we haven't mentioned Jools yet... ħuman 22:13, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

Did you see Kjeldsen is back on cp also? How about that? Bohdan2 22:14, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

Impressive - I wonder how long that will last? Is he joining the Danish Empire cabal Writer's Group? ħuman 22:30, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

We should form the DWG at conservapedia. Make it the largest source of information on Danes and their country. Bohdan2 22:44, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

It would be funnier to organize it from here - and also safer for Andrew and my fine self, since we can be blocked for 90/10... unless you want to create a "safe haven" user sub page for us to work from. ħuman 23:14, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

Whatever works best for you and Allison. Bohdan2 23:16, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

Hey! I have an idea!

Maybe you should unblock me on CP? _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 10:31, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Good God, Henry!

How can you people stand working with Conservapedia? Half the time I'm getting network timeouts, and the rest of the time it's unbearably slow! Can't you get Eagle Forum AAPS the tooth fairy to pay for some better servers or something? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:50, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

I can't either. I have been unable to get your talk page to load for 4 days. This might be the straw that broke the camel's back. Or, if anyone who reads this is an animal rights nut, we can make it a theists back. Bohdan2 18:21, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Come on, Henry. Censoring my poor little blog isn't going to make it go away, you know. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:29, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

If you don't write a Danish related article in the next five minutes, I will block you for two minutes and you won't be able to write anything at all! Bohdan2 18:31, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

That's not fair. I'm a slow writer. :-( --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:33, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Start a stub. Remember, this is conservapedia. Bohdan2 18:37, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Indeed.

Now, getting back to my blog, perhaps you could just remind me of which particular commandment or guideline it breaks? I mean, I wouldn't want to break any rules, now that I've been unblocked and all... --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:44, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

It breaks no commandment. It was just some good-natured harassment. Bohdan2 18:47, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Ah, fine. I'll just put it back, then. I hope you understand that I'm being a little cautious, all things considered. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:50, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Why? You aren't a vandal, are you? Bohdan2 18:52, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Not that I know of. Have I vandalized anything so far? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:53, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

No, you are doing quite well. btw, I noticed the blog is back on. I had been checking everyday since the last post. Bohdan2 18:57, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh, that's nice. You should use the RSS feed instead, though, that's much easier. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 18:59, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Who do you think I am?!? Bohdan2 19:02, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

That's a good question, actually. Who are you? And who am I? And who are all those people? And does any of this actually matter one way or the other? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:07, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

No. It does not. Stop depressing me. Can't we... can't we pretend it matters? Bohdan2 19:08, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Of course. Actually, pretending that it matters just might make do just that. One never knows. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:09, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Actually, I am pretty sure it will never matter. But lets keep pretending. Wheee! Wikis matter! Bohdan2 19:11, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

I have but one question: Why so serious? Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:18, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Quit asking questions. Enjoy the moment. Bohdan2 19:18, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

The moment is a lie. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 19:20, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

But not as much as the caek. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:25, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Enough is enough

Unblock me or explain yourself. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 08:30, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

If you were blocked you wouldn't be able to edit even talk pages, would you JeIIy? ^{— Unsigned, by: Proxima Centauri / talk / contribs}

I meant at Conservapedia, you silly star :P

I'm not even going to ask why you spelt my name with two capital is. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 09:39, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

We can't help unless you tell us the name of your little sockie there. Well---. lf you tell us the Assfly can read it as well. Alright we can't help you. Proxima Centauri 09:44, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Actually, the account in question predates my existence at RW, so it couldn't really be called a sock. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 09:51, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

They think you've got 15+ sockies there! You need yet another one, JelIy. Proxima Centauri 09:57, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

I already have too many neglected socks over there, but I wanted to have a honest account on CP for once. Unfortunately, Bohdan doesn't like me :( _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 10:09, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Come on, Henry. Chaos may be silly, but he/she/it/? is otherwise completely harmless. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 10:12, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

My new favourite pronoun :) _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 10:17, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

"?"? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 10:19, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

No, "He/she/it/?". Cumbersome, but effective! _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 10:20, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Aah. I must admit I never thought to think of it as a single pronoun. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 10:22, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Ask a different sysop. Bohdan2 15:27, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

I already asked Dan, Ed & CPWebmaster when I was originally blocked. They did not respond. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 15:28, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Too bad. Bohdan2 15:45, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Indeed. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 15:47, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Conservative Christian charity. Don't you just love it. Genghis^pillaging 15:49, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Ohh, I didn't unblock a vandal. How uncharitable! Bohdan2 15:50, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Still not a vandal. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 15:54, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Hey, I've got a spiffing idea! You could arrange to have me made a sysop at CP, Henry, then I could unblock Chaos. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:50, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Absolutely spiffing! GO nominate yourself for sysop. See what happens. Bohdan2 15:51, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh no, my modesty forbids me from doing that. Besides, I think the effect would be much greater if you did it. >_> --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:53, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

I am far to modest to do it also. And I can't get conservapedia to load. Bohdan2 15:54, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

WWJD? Genghis^pillaging 15:53, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm hungry. I think Jesus would go get a piece of caek. And a cup of coffee, perhaps. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:56, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Why the bad spelling? Is this some Danish ultra-right punk slang? Bohdan2 15:57, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

No, it's from some dank abyss of the Internet. You don't want to know. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:04, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

It's just lolcat, isn't it? _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 16:05, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

No, it is not just lolcat, it is a sophisticated merging of lolcat and Portal, creating thereby a meme of even higher abstraction and refinement than the two individually. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:09, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Although in fact, "delicious caek" predates portal/lolcat by several years and does find its origins among the dankest of internet humours. Uchiha^KATON! 21:50, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Compromise!

Let's meet halfway. Since I wasn't able to email Dan, perhaps you could do the honours? A simply query into his reasoning behind the Jelly-Senex allegations would do, I think. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 16:02, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

Dan hasn't been around on CP for over a month. Andy dissed Obama and I think Dan is a Christian, closet-liberal (OEC) so he took umbrage and withdrew. Send me a private email and I can let you have Dan's email address. Whether he'll respond is a different matter. Genghis^pillaging 16:14, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

I was there for all the Obama-smear-controversy stuff. That's partly why I thought it would make more sense for someone he knows from CP to contact him. I'll give your way a try, though...

But I still think Bohdan should unblock me. _{<blink>↳</blink> <blink>↑</blink> ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ←} 16:18, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

"80% of Ratwikians are anti-semites"

Please enlighten me.--Chris111 18:08, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Steno

I made an article about cp:Niels Steensen‎, because he's awesome, but I was wondering if it might be wise to avoid mentioning that his research more or less forms the geological basis for Darwin's theory of evolution. Do you have any input on this? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 19:31, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Add whatever you can source. I don't think it will matter. Bohdan2 21:19, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Guardian of the wiki

Hooray! Does that come with its own theme tune? :) ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 21:37, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Actually, no. It does not. Bohdan2 21:38, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

So you expect me to guard the whole wiki for nothing?? ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 21:47, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

I guess. Bohdan2 21:48, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Well sir, I refuse. You can guard it yourself. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 21:53, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

But, M. Polyp Colony, it is Bohdan you are to defend it from! ħuman 22:03, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Um... "M. Polyp Colony"? I did warn you not to drink the shoe polish, didn't I? ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 22:15, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Are you now claiming to be a single individual? I thought you were a blob of symbionts? ħuman 22:19, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Unblocking wikinterpreter??

Now you're just taunting me. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 23:16, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

He was not a vandal. Bohdan2 23:38, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm not a vandal either. Still.

Recently you've unblocked a lot of people with quite serious past transgressions against Conservapedia, so I don't know why you're making such a big deal about one mistaken accusation like this. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 10:27, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I want to join your wikiproject religion! ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 10:31, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Are you sure? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 10:34, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Yes! ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 10:37, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

A project about religion? On Conservapedia? Jesus would stay away from that. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 10:40, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I think it'll be fine as long as I don't edit YEC or ID-related stuff. Relaxing, even. Don't be so sceptical -- this is not some spur-of-the-moment plan, Anders :P ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 10:44, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Can't help it. It's what I've been trained to be, reinforcing my already pessimistic nature. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 10:48, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

You are a doleful Dane :nods:

And, apparently, prejudiced against religion wikiprojects!~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 10:59, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Only against those that are assured to end in tears and the gnashing of teeth. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 11:12, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Assured? Hardly. I think it would be perfectly fine... if I could actually do it. Hey! While we're in the realm of pure speculation, do you want to sign up alongside me? Come on, it'd be great! ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 11:13, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I see your optimism is irrepressible as always through it's not for lack of trying. I, however, must, as always, ask myself, what would Jesus do? And as I said, Jesus would stay the #%$! away from this. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 11:18, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Re:commas: I think the last one was gratuitous -- aside from that, they were perfectly reasonable, and, indeed, necessary. (Did you see what I did there? :)

Re:wikiproject: I don't see why adding neutral information to articles about religions that CP doesn't care about (new information on Buddhism and Hinduism, for example) should be at all dangerous. I have no interest in challenging anything I disagree with, or in the Christianity stuff. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 11:24, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Hm. I remain unconvinced. Anything about religion on CP is dangerous practically by definition. In any case, more practically speaking, the project appears to have attracted precisely zero interest so far, so I wonder if there even is a project to join. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 12:13, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

It isn't remotely dangerous, you silly Dane. It's not like I would be wading into anything controversial or opposing any pre-existing viewpoint there. Buddhism?? How can you get into any trouble there?? You are being a cowardy cowardy custard and I am hereby revoking your membership of that Danish writing thing. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 13:56, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

OH SHI- hey, wait, you're not even a member, are you? Besides, I am just trying to help you avoid a heap of misery that is essentially avoidable; but if you insist, then stride boldly forth into that valley of death, ye noble six hundred. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:36, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

<unindent>I might join just to make sure they don't fuck up the Jewy articles. הרב ד.לערנער ^{Ask the Rabbi a question} 11:23, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Unblock me please

My latest block is over at the end of the month, given for a bullshit reason (see WIGO) by Poor Ed, can you end it please? הרב ד.לערנער ^{Ask the Rabbi a question} 11:21, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

The people I unblock all have something in common. I am reluctant to unblock people who do not share this common trait. If you want I can ask Ed Poor to unblock you, he is quite reasonable about unblocking. Bohdan2 14:18, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

No. He isn't. He doesn't even respond to emails. Please don't be so naive, Bohdan. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 14:20, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Read my second to last contrib on his talk page, then see whether that is worthy of a block, If you think so, I'll wait another few days for it to expire. As for Ed Poor, I'm through dealing with him. I don't wan't any favors from him. (And as you will see from my post that got me blocked on his talk page, he doesn't answer my emails when I'm blocked by him. הרב ד.לערנער ^{Ask the Rabbi a question} 22:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Why don't you let me join?

Your silly Danish Writers thing, that is... I can make the tea. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 14:18, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Calling the Danish Writers Group "silly" is no way to ask. Bohdan2 14:19, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Twas in jest -- hence the crossed-out nature of it :) ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 14:20, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I endorse this honourable gentle-man/-woman/-thing/-?'s application for membership. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 15:37, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

But all we are supposed to do is write content for Conservapedia, hence the name: Conservapedia Danish Writers Group. This user is blocked at conservapedia. Don't you see the issue? Bohdan2 16:29, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

You're right. That is a knotty problem.

Hmmm... ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 16:50, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Why couldn't you control your urge to destroy that which you do not agree with? Bohdan2 16:52, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

That's what I intend to do, dammit! You won't even let me have an opportunity. You don't really think I'm asking to be unblocked just so I could vandalise CP? I could do that without asking you, if that's what I wanted. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 16:58, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Well, if this honourable gentle-man/-woman/-thing/-? should in fact happen to have been blocked from Conservapedia, the obvious solution seems to be to unblock him/her/it/?, thus removing the obstacle. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:22, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

By George! You've solved it! ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 17:23, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

It's a natural talent. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:23, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

You typed that with ungodly speed. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 17:25, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Yes. That's a natural talent, as well. I'm usually a rather slow writer, though. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:28, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

In any case, Henry, look at it this way. It's not exactly as if Conservapedia is overflowing with high-quality editors right now. Here we have an editor who's not only qualified, but also, for some inscrutable reason, willing to contribute to the project. Regardless of which transgressions he/she/it/? may or may not have committed in the past, why not at least give him/her/it/? a second chance? It's what Jesus would do. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:46, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

RobSmith

<stern>I know that's you. Come out with your hands up.</stern> ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 19:51, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Question.

Why did you block then unblock DamianJohn? And why do you think everyone is Ames? -- Gen. S.T. Shrink ^{Get to the bunker} 21:35, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Hey could you please unblock me for 5 minutes. I just want to say goodbye to a few people. Remember I never vandalized the site, nor did I do any acts of parody. And I'm not Ames either (who is Ames anyway?)--Damo2353 01:00, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Hi, Henry

Have you unblocked Chaos! yet? If not, why not? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 06:10, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I am called Gloom, these days. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 06:22, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Ok. Should I rename your account? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 06:23, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

No no no. I don't want any more plates broken, thanks :P ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 06:27, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Oki-day. Feel free to ask anytime. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 06:28, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Think about it Anders. What is different about your block and his? What is different about Humans block and his? What is different about Wikinterpreters block and his? Can you not see this? Bohdan2 14:07, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Instead of handwaving and being all ominous and shit, how about giving actual guidelines to figure out who may deserve your mercy and who doesn't? That would spare us this ripoff of Twenty Questions. --Sid 14:45, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Well, I got blocked because I quit, not for any suspected high crimes against Conservapdia - but other than that, I must admit that, no, I don't see any significant difference. Perhaps you'd take the time to explain these arcane matters to us simple mortals, oh great Henry? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:00, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

So this guy's from CP or wut? Chris Fanshaw 16:02, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, he's a sysop, but one of the not-all-that-insane ones. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:05, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Thank you for the compliment. You really aren't all that insane either. Bohdan2 16:06, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Maybe I'm just good at hiding it. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:08, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

That could be true. Bohdan2 16:13, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

O RLY? Does he laik mudkips? Chris Fanshaw 16:09, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I doubt it. Do you like mudkips, Henry? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:10, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I am undoing some of TKs unfair blocks. Not blocks of actual vandals. Bohdan2 16:04, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Henry, think about this for a moment. You just today blocked a sock whom you thought was Ames. It turned out to be Susan. Ames is in New York. Susan is somewhere in the UK. I'm sure you'll agree that's a bit of a miss there. What does this say about your, i.e. the CP sysops' general ability to determine user identities? I would that it appears to be not very good at all. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:08, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

You cannot be serious. Do you honestly think I thought that user was Ames? I have blocked many people claiming they were either you or him, including one with the name " Poopbuttbutt". Does that sound like Ames? No, I did not think it was Ames. Claiming all vandals are socks of Ames is just a joke. Do you understand? Bohdan2 16:12, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

So does that mean you actually have no idea who these people are? Or what? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:16, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Correct. They are either blocked for vandalism, the name itself (poopbuttbutt) etc. If this offends you I will stop. Ames had no problem with it, he denied the allegations on my old talk page without any sign of offense. Bohdan2 16:19, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Did you notice it was only you and ames? Bohdan2 16:20, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

No, I didn't. I haven't really been keeping up. It doesn't offend me at all, I'm just trying to figure out your modus operandi. But that means that hypothetically, DanH might also have had no idea whether or not Jellyfish was in fact Senex, right? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:26, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Did DanH have the checkuser ability? Bohdan2 16:27, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

CP is slow as usual, so I can't be arsed to check (Haha. Get it? "Check." Eh? Eh?), but I can't imagine he didn't, considering his seniority. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:39, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

He was given CheckUser rights on September 27 (same date as for the other seniors, so I assume that was the date they limited CheckUser to only certain sysops?). --Sid 16:45, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

I guess that's all pretty moot anyway since DanH left. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 17:20, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

DanH did have checkuser, and in my experience he was very efficient and fair-minded in the application of his sysopic powers. I expect what happened was my wildly fluctuating Tor-generated IP address happened to use the same exit node as Senex at some point, hence making it seem like we might be the same user. This happens a lot with Tor, actually -- download it yourself and see how often you get the aftereffects of old autoblocks on CP. There are only so many Tor exit nodes, after all. ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 17:32, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Sounds like a fun project. Tell me once you reached my old account then. Unless you want to force me into some arbitrary Writing Plan afterwards... --Sid 16:37, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Hehe, chances are you will at be expected to join the Danish Writing Group, at least nominally. ħuman 16:46, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

You stupid tosser

1: it wasn't AMES

2: I hadn't finished

  ^Contribs_Talk 14:13, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

What a dickhead. All Shabby can see is vandalism. Most editors at RW have actually tried to help and improve Conservapedia. Someone offers constructive advice and an ignorant kid puts the blocks on. How pathetic. Genghis^pillaging 14:29, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Mh? Oh, you mean WillieC? Yeah, great work, Bohdan. Andy effectively broke the wiki, and you go ahead and shoot the messenger who delivers a possible cure. --Sid 14:47, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Yeah I went back in to format it &co & couldn't save it.   ^Contribs_Talk 14:49, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Re:Trolling

I'm sure I don't know what you're referring to, my good man Henry. I was just trying to fit in with the hearty and manly banter that has been going around on CP of late. Was I doing it wrong? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:39, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Banta, yr doin it rong. ħuman 05:52, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Damn. :-( --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 06:46, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Once more with feeling...

You want contributors that badly? I have a solution that benefits everyone! ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 08:51, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

Hi!

Can you unblock me on CP? Thanks! ~ Gloom_{(is never asleep)} 23:27, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

Mr Gloomy Chaos, I must admit that I have started having second thoughts about the value in continuing to contribute to Mr Schlafly's project, and so should you. And since Mr Henry here seems to be a smart guy, I think he should as well. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 05:27, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

Happy

Nice poem, Henry. I would probably have chosen something by Shelley. I guess I tend to be too conventional.

I'm happy to hear that you're all happy. One big, happy family, eh? Eh? --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 06:30, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Thank you! Could you do Ozymandias next? That's always been my favourite. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 11:56, 28 August 2008 (EDT)

Philosopher

Hi, if you happen to know HenryS over there at CP, tell him that User:Socrates was no troublemaker, just a nice and kind philosopher. I enjoyed his contributions very much. Liar at RP^{(Ed at CP)} 19:51, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

Sorry, Henry

There has to be a limit somewhere. I wash my hands of this project. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:30, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

I'm sorry to hear that CP is in such dire straits that they will fail without me. However, as one of your friendly and even-tempered sysop colleagues (probably Jinx _{hi Jinx!}, but I forget) was kind enough to remind us recently, "actions have consequences." In this case, the action is Andy's rampant and completely uninformed history denialism, and the consequence is that you lose me as a contributor for good.

That said, if you want to find the real reason why Conservapedia is failing, you should look not to my absence, but to Andy's continued presence. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:09, 4 September 2008 (EDT)

Your edit comment: indeed, it is quite catchy. Should be enscribed on some kind of monument. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{I kill spider} 16:10, 4 September 2008 (EDT)

Oh, thank you. Unfortunately, it is very rare that anyone erect monuments to historians. For some reason. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 16:13, 4 September 2008 (EDT)