User talk:ExtroversionOliveOyl

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, ExtroversionOliveOyl!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

— Unsigned, by: ExtroversionOliveOyl / talk / contribs

Oh hell nah, you're seriously trying to welcome yourself to the community...well I see you're a sockpuppet (though I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you lost your password) and have committed plagiarism in the past. Both of these facts on top of this earn you this little gem:
New logo large.png Meh. You signing up for a RationalWiki account doesn't really move us one way or the other, ExtroversionOliveOyl.

This is probably because of your poor, obvious attempts at trolling or displays of unwelcome behavior. Maybe you should try to examine our articles and mission statement first, or take a walk outside.

We realize that it's possible that you may be here in good faith, so we'll do our best to tolerate it. But don't expect us to get too excited.

Our Newcomers' Guide may help clarify things for you.

Hope you enjoy your stay, however long it is. But don't play stupid games, please. Thank you!
Sincerely, Postuhenin the neurodivergent doodlebug! (say hi! ^^) 06:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Postuhenin

Presenting freely licensed content WITH ATTRIBUTION for strictly informational purposes is not plagiarism within traditional academic definitions of the term.

I am used to being picked on due to my perspectives and neurodiversity. Perhaps you are as well. I sometimes have difficulty separating out which one it is, but it's not a good place to start a relationship from. ExtroversionOliveOyl (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

What perspective exactly is it that you have to offer? Carthage (talk) 20:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
@Carthage Nihilistic absolute skepticism. Even Descartes was off. "Therefore I am" does not follow from "I think." ExtroversionOliveOyl (talk) 19:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
That's fair, but what's your line of reasoning here? I do agree that "therefore I am" is assumed when it is not guaranteed to be an automatic relationship. Carthage (talk) 20:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Warning icon orange.svg Warning: Solipsism conversation ahead may rot your brain!

Man photographing himself in cornered mirror to generate illusion cropped.jpg

All we perceive through eyes and ears and skin is so far as we know electrical pulses processed in a brain. Everything could be manufactured. Even the "thought" that we are thinking. I don't think "I think" is provable. But if anything perceived is to be taken as reality, I am led towards thinking that a model of Pandeism would best account for it. But that is little more than a hunch, not worthy of being called a "belief" (if anything at all is). ExtroversionOliveOyl (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
@CircularReasoning Your Solipsism "warning" is a defense mechanism against admitting that you don't know. Scary to think that all our experiences boil down to electrical signals, which could be manufactured. ExtroversionOliveOyl (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools: