User talk:Jorge
Word time Phantom! 11:44, 9 February 2009 (EST)
Yes Jorge, welcome to the emancipated house of busting hub caps! Javasca₧ No comment
- Hello, Jorge, and welcome to RationalWiki! Thank you for joining us, and I hope you enjoy your time here. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:29, 9 February 2009 (EST)
My First CP Ban! Banned for Life[edit]
I've been on CP for over a year and I just got my first block (only five years) for this edit to the 'humor' entry. Sheesh...
The block has been kindly reduced to one week after I made an apology for my use of the phrase 'anal insertion' in reference to the Jackass show. If any conservapeds by chance are reading this, I hope you won't take my presence here to reflect that my CP doppelganger intends any malice towards the site.
- Yeah, blowing your cover isn't going to help. They occasionally troll RW and don't like things like this. Neveruse513 09:37, 11 February 2009 (EST)
hmm, good point, well, I suppose you shouldn't risk it, RationalWiki seems sort a bit anti-intellectual, IMO anyway. Unknown User 09:44, 11 February 2009 (EST)
- We can hide this if you want. Neveruse513 10:34, 11 February 2009 (EST)
Don't think just because I changed my userID that means I will succumb to your ATHEIST LIBERAL ideaology. You can cover your face behind your phony mask, "Neveruse513", but you can never hide from the truth!!! A Díos.Jorge 10:57, 11 February 2009 (EST)
Besides, DeanS already caught up with me. Its good to know other people have as much time to waste as I do do the important work of patrolling for wandals.Jorge 12:29, 11 February 2009 (EST)
Unfortunately, it might be your last CP ban. Hi Dean!!!1 Neveruse513 14:03, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Thas OK Dean, I guess its time to put on my business socks!1o!OO1o1o1o1OO!O1O1o!o1o1o1o1o1o1 Jorge 14:15, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Talk pages[edit]
May I remind you of our community standards on talk pages. RationalWiki:Community_Standards#Talk_pages. Basically, once something is on a talk page then it shouldn't be edited.--Rationalist 12:49, 11 February 2009 (EST)
I'm not sure I understand. Would that include re-editing the edited edits also? Jorge 12:56, 11 February 2009 (EST)
Sysopship[edit]
Unfortunately, in light of your recent edits, I have decided to make you a sysop. An informatory pamphlet can be found here. Word time Phantom! 12:08, 12 February 2009 (EST)
- I now feel sullied by your abuse of power; I disown thee! Word time Phantom! 04:23, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
New articles[edit]
Hi Jorge, nice to see you. A few things every articles need.
- Links in (What is linking too it?)
- Links out (What else is important to read?)
- A note about these two please avoid link islands, that is a few pages that just link to each other
- A category to be placed in.
- No red links, if we don't have an article please create on or leave it out.
- A Footnotes section with <references /> placed in it
- And if you are going to leave it short place {{stub}} at the bottom.
Cheers - User 22:18, 12 February 2009 (EST)
- Also another point, normally if an article has User:Something rather than User_talk:Something don't edit it, although like every rule there is an exception and you can edit that article as much as you like. - User 22:22, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Now I Is Angry[edit]
Why come Cp is smart? I know3 pi and neveruse is soCps so wh? hide? Jorge 02:51, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
- What were you leaving messages on my talkpage about and what have you been up to? - User 20:04, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
What the fuck??!?!!?![edit]
Did you do? ---YossieSpring in Fialta 03:52, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
- Oh, no, another ToPing of the database. We need a backup webmaster. Word time Phantom! 04:15, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
dick Awesome![edit]
Mei is useful 05:17, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
- Look, I'm sorry. I didn't think it would be that hard to revert, but... Jorge 00:25, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
- You seem to have become something of a pariah around here. I have de-vandal binned as the lose of your sysop powers should be punishment enough, unless you start vandalising the site more. - User 04:35, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
- I suppose I should be honored to earn such a reputation with only a few dozen edits. Again, I apologize for burning the WIGOCP; I had assumed it would be an easy revert and I meant no harm to the site. That being said, I didn't care for sysopship anyway, so this works out fine. Jorge 10:45, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- You seem to have become something of a pariah around here. I have de-vandal binned as the lose of your sysop powers should be punishment enough, unless you start vandalising the site more. - User 04:35, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
your foot[edit]
which one is it? Neveruse513 10:50, 19 March 2009 (EDT)
- Wouldn't you like to know? :, Jorge 01:17, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
Sysopship[edit]
Do you think you are ready to be a sysop again? - User 19:37, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Thanks for asking, though I don't think I'd be very useful at it. However, if this means I can come out of the proverbial doghouse, then I accept your offer graciously. Jorge 19:49, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Okay you are a sysop again. I will tell you what I tell all new sysops. Don't block anyone but other sysop; for vandals use the vandal bin, IP vandals will require blocking. Don't delete or protect a page without asking first. Don't edit others talkpage comments and do not remove comments without archiving the whole thread (you are responsible for keeping this page in order but it does not belong to you). Please read RationalWiki:Community standards and RationalWiki:Sysop guide. Okay good luck and as a rule to using sysop powers ask before you do anything, doesn't matter who just as long as someone knows what you are doing. - User 19:55, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Also, see this guidline on Wikipedia. User:Theemperor/Sig/Sig 20:01, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- You can ignore the rules once you have mastered them. - User 20:03, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Also, see this guidline on Wikipedia. User:Theemperor/Sig/Sig 20:01, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Testes[edit]
I didz it! Jorge as if my opinion counts 13:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Signature[edit]
Your signature randomly causes the timestamp following it to appear in a box of
this sort.
ListenerXTalkerX 04:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
It hasn't been doing that on my screen, take a look, any thoughts? I just hacked it from various others' sigtalks. Jorge noes teh maths 04:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think I fixed it, lemme know if you see it again.
Jorge might get around to it 04:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Ex alcoholics, etc.[edit]
Good for you. My liver applauds you. I hope you succeed, one day at a time. Best wishes, ħuman 03:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks![edit]
Hey George, thanks for the offer of help! It is very kind of you, truly. I am fine though, I think maybe some of comments have been taken out of context is all. I have a good woman here who keeps a sharp eye on me and if she felt I was slipping to much I would get beaten with tyre iron and a whipped with an electrical cord. Nice to know there are good people like you out there though, renews my faith in humanity. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 04:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC) P.S - And of course, good for you and the wagon!!! It takes a strong person for that hence you have my uptmost respect! Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 04:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)