User talk:Naama123

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neutral?! This ain't the Wikipedia, there is no Dana NPOV, only Zuul SPOV.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 00:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Yup! I think we are 99.99% feminist, sorry. Scream!! (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Reality has a well-known liberal bias.
Stephen Colbert

Withoutaname (talk) 01:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Everyone claims, that reality had a bias toward one's political, religious and so on views.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 01:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
The difference is some of them are legitimately correct. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 01:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Naama123!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome. Why do you find feminism clawed? Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 02:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

You asked why i thought feminism was flawed and here is my response. I would say my biggest gripe with feminism is probably the fact that it focuses on small issues like women in video games, rather than focusing on large issues such as oppression in china and saudi arabia. I also don't like the fact that people like anita sarkeesian don't acknowledge criticism and just pass people who disagree with them as conspiracy theorists or harassers. obviously these people do get harassed, and the people who do harass people should be banned. User:Naama123 (talk)

Not as bad as - David Gerard (talk) 08:05, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't think that's true: Excluding the fact that modern feminists often work to stop practices such as FGM, purely Western feminism deals with (1) the gender pay gap, (2) the high rape rates of women, (3) reproductive rights such as abortion and contraception, and (4) the constraining gender roles of men and women, all of which seem very substantial to me. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 14:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)