User talk:Rpeh/Archive 1

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Rpeh!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Aboriginal Noise Punkrock 21:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Rpeh. Welcome.--Bobbing up 17:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes, Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħumanUser talk:Human 02:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

power[edit]

You have been made a sysop due to solid contribs, good comment on the inactivity debate page and because I said so. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 02:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Don't forget to give him the bogroll instruction manual. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
I can never find it and this computer is fucking up. I need to restart the bastard. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 03:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Here be The guide. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 03:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
I shall take my demotion humbly. Cheers. Rpeh 04:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Operation forgery[edit]

I have forged the images you requested. -- Nx / talk 15:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Brilliant. Sorry to be cloak-and-dagger about it but there was an obvious risk of someone burning the diffs if I'd asked in public.
Now I have seen how easily screenshots can be forged I can join Operation Forgery and by the time I've finished in regards to this Operation, it is likely Liberals will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :) Rpeh 16:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Just remember that if neither I, Ames, or Trent "encourage" you, you aren't part of Operation Forgery! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
So I see. I guess it just proves how much you filthy, deceitful liberals have corrupted me. Rpeh 04:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
"Trent Tmtoulouse"? Ahahahaha. Educated cubic Hoover! 07:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Dont let them get to you[edit]

Hey Rpeh. Don't let them get to you. When I first joined here I expected it to be a haven of enlightenment values, rational discourse, etc. What I quickly came to realise is that this group is just like any other on the net. Even in some ways like CP. We're all just a bunch of partially evolved monkeys and sometimes it's difficult for everyone to shake off the pack animal mentality - including me of course. For the record I value your inputs and don't suspect you of being TK but then I'm an overly trusting wooly minded liberal so I guess that's only to be expected. StarFish 09:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

:) Thank you. Alas, I'm going through exactly the same process of realisation you did. I definitely won't let it get to me though - I found the TK sock thing more funny than anything else, which is why I put it on my user page. I'm more worried that I might not be me, although I'm hoping it means I might actually be, say, Brad Pitt. Rpeh 10:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Pi was talking to NightFlare, not you. TK had a sock called NightTrain. -- Nx / talk 10:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

TK sock[edit]

TK's old sock was NightTrain. Every time I see NightFlare I double take. I was not referring to you. - π 10:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for clearing that up. Rpeh 10:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
That all good. - π 10:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

TK sock[edit]

TK's old sock was NightTrain. Every time I see NightFlare I double take. I was not referring to you. - π 10:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for clearing that up. Rpeh 10:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Well, there's an easy way to fix that. Like my new sig? I think it's cute. FlareTalk 23:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Nice. - π 12:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

RW's TK[edit]

Ohhh nasty! Ace McWickedi9 23:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Seriously, grow the fuck up. - π 13:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry... but what's the problem? Why do insist on biting the newbie instead of reading the fucking edit comment I used when I added that line and bite the longstanding member instead? I took off the bad bit. Now go and bother someone else. Rpeh 13:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
I have now. Thanks. - π 13:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Fucking terrible. Whoever Rpeh is (and I have no reason to doubt him) he deserves to be treated with the same respect as any other user. And he's right by the way. You're behaving like TK in terms of paranoia and downright nastiness. The attitudes expressed towards this guy (if not the actual language) are straight from CP. Take a long hard look at yourselves. StarFish 06:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Actually I'm being just as bad. What am I thinking posting stuff like the above? Nothing to do with me and none of my business. Rpeh sounds quite capable of fighting his own fight. I think I'm going to have a couple of days off this site to breathe deeply, count to 10, etc. The reason for posts like the one above may be connected to this. No excuse though. Sorry guys. Moving on.... StarFish 07:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

Balloons.svg I can't remember why you left, but it is nice to see you back. Been having fun at Terry's crazy shack? - π 09:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Rpeh originally disappeared in 2009 because he fought against other CP:WIGOers' desire to post much-too-personal information about the various Conservapedia sysops. Even back then, he had no grasp of what the community was like (which is incredibly forgiving of past transgressions, provided the perpetrator doesn't constantly remind people of them), so he created SuspectedReplicant as a sock account, mistakenly thinking it was necessary to literally create a new name in order to continue here.
As SuspectedReplicant, he got banned for repeatedly divulging Nx's real name against his permission. When his ban expired, he set about reminding people that he's still a shallow, vindictive shithead. He has now come crawling back under his old username because he's a cowardly little bitch. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 10:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for being an asshole RA. I, and probably 90% of the users, would not have remembered any of that if you didn't keep records on everyone. Why do you spend so much time living in the past? I can't even remember who edited here a year ago or what they did, but it is always nice to see a familiar name. - π 10:32, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Oh, and thanks for the welcome, π - I got distracted. Yes, I've been having lots of fun over at Chucharse's. It's fun to play bait the fundy idiot every so often. rpeh •TCE 10:37, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Ah. Still the same old, deeply unpleasant fuckwit you always were, Stabby. Now the actual truth: Nx was telling lies about me so I told the truth about him. When I heard Bricks was also telling lies about me, I decided to pop back and set the record straight. After receiving a couple of "welcome back" emails, and since the site seemed a bit more pleasant than it had been, I decided to make a couple more posts. Thanks for proving that the same arrogant, talentless shits are still around. And I'm hardly trying to hide anything given that my fucking user page still redirects to SR's, am I? Or did you accidentally smash the wrong key while headbutting your keyboard in an attempt to type? rpeh •TCE 10:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

What really happened is that I made a guess that a certain IP comment was made by you after you LANCB'd, because it was so obvious, and then you proved me right by going apeshit crazy over it and revealing my real name in a pathetic attempt to get back at me. RA/Stabby, Rpeh was right when he originally LANCB'd over the privacy issue. Of course he had no grasp of what the community was like, which consists of a bunch of hypocritical assholes. Oh, and Rpeh already crawled back as User:TerrenceKoeckring (obvious sock is obvious), and the ban on SuspectedReplicant has not yet expired. — Unsigned, by: 217.112.128.247 / talk / contribs 2012-04-15T17:18:15

I went apeshit because I'm got fed up of being accused of socking when I'm not. I have one alternative account: SuspectedReplicant. Yes, for full disclosure, I think I created a couple of joke accounts with silly names, but I never used them beyond whatever their original purpose might have been, and I remember neither the names nor the passwords. I used this account to post specifically to ensure people knew it was definitely coming from rpeh/SuspectedReplicant.
TerrenceKoeckring is not me. Yes, Terrence edits from the same IP range, even the same IP and even the same MAC address... but that doesn't mean it's the same person. Given the number of people who've criticised CP for blocking the world and it's husband as being socks of Ace, Horace, Trent, Uncle Tom Cobley and All... I'm a bit surprised this is such a popular meme here.
Incidentally, a big "thank you" to RadioactiveIdiot for blocking me and Terrence (and de-sysopping the latter with no authority). I mentioned welcome emails in my earlier post. One of them was from a moderator. I pointed out to this moderator that the rpeh account ought to be blocked and was told - in a friendly way - to fuck off. I've made a grand total of four posts not related to socking because I know I'm blocked and didn't want to use my other account to circumvent that (too much). If I hadn't had a nice welcome from Pi and a couple of nice emails, I wouldn't have posted anything else. If there's a general consensus that this account should be blocked, then go for it. I'm not going to object.
Oh, and restore Terrence's sysop rights. "He" has done nothing wrong. rpeh •TCE 20:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
TerrenceKoeckring is not me. Yes, Terrence edits from the same IP range, even the same IP and even the same MAC address... but that doesn't mean it's the same person.
This account that smells of socks exists to make one point and one point only.
And I'm the Queen of England. You tried this shit at UESP and no-one bought it. I'm not buying it either 217.112.128.247 (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
I don't care what countries you rule, or what other crap you want to drag into it. Yes, I'm a sock. No, I'm not rpeh's sock. Bad luck, Nx; bad luck RA; try again. I feel I ought to say that the way in which RA/Nx have used bot permissions to hide blocks and unblocks from RecentChanges is a really, really shitty thing to do and that they should both be censored for doing it like that. If either one feel their actions are justified, let's see those actions in the full light of day. TerrenceKoeckring (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
I unblocked you, I thought you would be more grateful. 217.112.128.247 (talk) 21:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Fully justified. Rpeh/SR has a history of socking up a lying about it. SR and Terrence frequent the same pages, talk the same way, vote the same way, and complain about the exact same things. All those factors together point to "sockpuppet." Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
I don't know about UESP, but errr... no we don't edit the same pages (except TWIGOCP), we don't talk the same way, we don't vote the same way and don't complain about the exact same things. Although I admit we both consider you to be a tosser. TerrenceKoeckring (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Welcome back. AceModerator 20:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I hear you now live in the third world according to our resident idiot? rpeh •TCE 20:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Apparently living in a country superior to the US in nearly every metric is "third world". AceModerator 20:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if you got the message or not, but since I was blocked at the time, I asked a mutual friend to call you a tent-dwelling aborigine on my behalf. Since RobS never lies, I'm bound to trust him in this matter. rpeh •TCE 22:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
I've been calling him a tent-dwelling aborigine for 3 years. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 22:09, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I'll call him a tent-dwelling aborigine with a small cock. I've had him, and he was really disappointing. rpeh •TCE 22:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Good to see you back. Disregarding all of the shit above this comment which I haven't read and only assume to be shit, how've you been? El TajDon't make me do stuff 21:34, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
I've got a great new job, thanks for asking! I hope you've been well too. rpeh •TCE 22:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Now I can edit my talk page...[edit]

I've seen the discussion. Leave the block. I posted because I felt I had to make a point in one particular debate. I made a couple of other posts because I thought people were prepared to move on. They aren't, so fair's fair - I'm blocked for a reason so leave it intact.

All I ask is that if people are going to re-block me they do it in the light of day. RA blocking me which in Ninja mode was a dick-mode act that should be condemned regardless of any sentence. Blocks shouldn't be hidden. Ditto Nx's unblock. It might have been well-meant but justice must be seen to be done. rpeh •TCE 22:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

I thought that what you did to Nx was a bitch move...[edit]

...but we all make bitch moves. I'm big on forgiveness. Come back when the block is over. Theory of Practice "I never set out to hit anybody. It's just that a lot of people got hit." -- Andy Roberts 22:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it was. Mainly because of the bullshit I had to go through elsewhere, I went into dick mode and did something I shouldn't have done. I still think there was an abuse that let one user hide accusations about him while leaving his own accusations in place, but that's another matter. rpeh •TCE 22:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)