User talk:Nature's Mockery
Archives: User talk:Sievert 81/Archive 1
user:lol[edit]
By the way, after that asshat posted the account's password, I logged into that account and changed the password. I doubt we'll see anything from that account ever again. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 00:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
behave yourself[edit]
LondonGrump (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Raven accounts that are being banned right now[edit]
You're doing a good job banning all the spam, but I think you're also giving him too much attention calling him an idiot and telling him to fuck off every in every account he creates. In my opinion just a ban is fine. GeeJayK (talk) 03:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Who the hell is this guy anyway? Mike or EiK? Sievert 81 (talk) 03:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Here.
- (edit conflict) Another troll entirely. He came here to start drama with oxy and plagued the wiki through most of 2020. He was eventually permabanned in one of the biggest landslides in ratwiki penalty vote history.-Flandres (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I see. Why did the guy not get banned immediately for being a troll? Sievert 81 (talk) 03:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- He could make good contributions sometimes, at least at first. He also was not always as bad as he ended up being(though one could argue he was just hiding his ulterior motives), and let's face it a lot of people don't like oxy and are not predisposed to stick up for her. Also, I would recommend looking at coop case archive 116, the one he was actually permabanned in. Especially the actual vote-it was...very lopsided.-Flandres (talk) 03:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I doubt that the recent raven spam is associated with the banned Godless Raven account. It's probably just another one of the pooties that's fucking with us. Ban on sight and ignore. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 04:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- He could make good contributions sometimes, at least at first. He also was not always as bad as he ended up being(though one could argue he was just hiding his ulterior motives), and let's face it a lot of people don't like oxy and are not predisposed to stick up for her. Also, I would recommend looking at coop case archive 116, the one he was actually permabanned in. Especially the actual vote-it was...very lopsided.-Flandres (talk) 03:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- I see. Why did the guy not get banned immediately for being a troll? Sievert 81 (talk) 03:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Another troll entirely. He came here to start drama with oxy and plagued the wiki through most of 2020. He was eventually permabanned in one of the biggest landslides in ratwiki penalty vote history.-Flandres (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Here.
- I do not believe it is Godless Raven. The accounts here seem to be named the same conventional way that Michael Coombs 'used' to name his accounts. Hell, in hindsight, if I was a troll and I wanted to be extra prickly today I could just impersonate someone else. Mikey has apparently a long history of impersonation on the wiki, way before he became the most despised troll of RW. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 21:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Award[edit]
|
Tireless Worker Award | |
— Unsigned, by: Knight Commander / talk / contribs
Essay?[edit]
I'm probably not the only person who is mystified by your change in editing behavior here. Perhaps you'd like to write an essay on what caused the change in your thinking? It looks like you ate your words on this one:
“”Conservatives that find this website aren't switching to RW. Also, you can't talk any sense into RW. I tried.
|
| —Sievert 81 (talk) 23:48, 14 November 2020 (EST)[1] |
Bongolian (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Bongolian and Sievert 81, Also, his userpage on CP said "all anti-theists are bad" iirc, and now his RW user page says "right-wing anti-theist" and "this user believes all religions are a form of psychosocial control and are therefore inherently bad for you", so, I would also like to see such an essay. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 02:44, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- I was always an anti-theist, I just wanted to hide it to avoid a ban. As for the quote, when “sense” means crazy conspiracy theories and far right propaganda, then yes. I will add to Conservapedia:Parthian Shot but i don’t have the time for an essay right now. Just bought 6 laptops to fix.Sievert 81 (talk) 03:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Lets play a game[edit]
| 8 | ♜ | ♞ | ♝ | ♛ | ♚ | ♝ | ♞ | ♜ |
| 7 | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | ♟ | |
| 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | ♟ | |||||||
| 4 | ♙ | |||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | ♙ | |
| 1 | ♖ | ♘ | ♗ | ♕ | ♔ | ♗ | ♘ | ♖ |
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h |
You can be white :) Take as long as you like Kauri0.o (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- 1.e4Sievert 81 (talk) 04:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- 2.c5 Kauri0.o (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, this is gonna take a lot longer... why not just join https://lichess.org/BLxT2Bja? @Kauri0.o Sievert 81 (talk) 04:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Beauty of playing here is there's no time constraint :) Don't have time for a full game right now. I just followed you on lichess- ill challenge you to some time controls another day Kauri0.o (talk) 04:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- We could just do a correspondence game :p That would be easier than all these edits Sievert 81 (talk) 04:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- accepted. good luck! Kauri0.o (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just got off work, played the first move. Sievert 81 (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- accepted. good luck! Kauri0.o (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- We could just do a correspondence game :p That would be easier than all these edits Sievert 81 (talk) 04:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Beauty of playing here is there's no time constraint :) Don't have time for a full game right now. I just followed you on lichess- ill challenge you to some time controls another day Kauri0.o (talk) 04:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, this is gonna take a lot longer... why not just join https://lichess.org/BLxT2Bja? @Kauri0.o Sievert 81 (talk) 04:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- 2.c5 Kauri0.o (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Kauri0.oYou should turn that into a template, that'd be interesting.MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity...[edit]
What was the video/comment section argument that inspired the very intelligent comment you captured and uploaded to the Libtard page? IveBeenFrank (talk) 20:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- It was some stupid “my ex” joke. Someone commented something about their ex being like Chernobyl, and this guy comments unprovoked “Yeah, and leftists”. An argument ensued leading to this comment. Sievert 81 (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Libtard.jpeg[edit]
In that image description you said "I (Sievert 81 (talk)) created this work entirely by myself.", but I still can't confirm; do you mean that you wrote that comment, or that you were just the one who screenshotted it? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 20:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- I screenshotted it. Forgot to clarify. Sievert 81 (talk) 22:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Phages and phagetherapy[edit]
Hi, I read your article about Prions a while ago and I wanted to know, do you know something about phagetherapy? I think this might be missional. GeeJayK (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- No, my scope of knowledge is mostly limited to prions. Sievert 81 (talk) 16:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations[edit]
You’ve fulfilled the requirements to become a ninja, annoying a tech/mod by filling up their precious recent changes. I agree those drafts needed to go, but I think we can leave it at that, the edit summary hiding was unnecessary I think. Christopher (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- The worst part about this is someone pointed it out on the talk page... and did nothing... Sievert 81 (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Question[edit]
Regarding this - who is LT? --Andrew5 (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Andrew5 User:LT, presumably. Vomitorium (talk) 00:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)