There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Techpriest
Aurora[edit]
Honest opinion, I hope she gets turned into a mors. Damn, talk about a plot twist. Arcadium Trancefer (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind. Mélusine had a better idea. Arcadium Trancefer (talk) 18:11, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Tunguska Sanctuary[edit]
Can I use Leyline stones here? Wanna know for future references, since I'll be fighting Koyanskaya twice here and I had to use one in my fight with her in Olympus. Arcadium Trancefer (talk) 15:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Inferno bot not working yet again[edit]
Like, can control of the bot be handed over to the techs as a whole or something, 'coz the current situation is untenable at this point Plutocow (talk) 06:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Now working again Plutocow (talk) 19:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure that I did a server update that day, which is what caused it to skip a day. -- Techpriest (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Awesome Award[edit]
For doing that stuff with the Wikipedia templates and the Scribunto to fix the citations. Thanks!!! DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW
dictator moderator 05:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Clarification on eligibility[edit]
What's the criteria for being allowed to vote on ATIM and Coop cases? I have 728 edits and joined 5 months ago, is that enough? ミ★ LunaAHHHHH 20:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Same here, but I’ve already voted. If it’s not valid, you can feel free to undo/rem or dismiss it. But I think it’s a community vote, so it’s valid unlike a coop vote? — Lunar|✉ 20:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I believe decisions like the one being made against Cory are normally made in the Coop, so I would assume the same rules would apply despite it happening in the ATIM. ミ★ LunaAHHHHH 20:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @LunaAHHHHH You are eligible to vote. Lunar was not. Voting eligibility is outlined in the Community Standards.
DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW
dictatormoderator 20:44, 19 February 2025 (UTC)- Ok. Thank you. ミ★ LunaAHHHHH 20:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- For future reference, the exact policy is also listed here. You can also check Special:Preferences to see if you're eligible, there's a user group attached to it (which is mostly because the same criteria we use for policy/penalty votes is also used to restrict the mod election page). -- Techpriest (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. Thank you. ミ★ LunaAHHHHH 20:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @LunaAHHHHH You are eligible to vote. Lunar was not. Voting eligibility is outlined in the Community Standards.
- I believe decisions like the one being made against Cory are normally made in the Coop, so I would assume the same rules would apply despite it happening in the ATIM. ミ★ LunaAHHHHH 20:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Same here, but I’ve already voted. If it’s not valid, you can feel free to undo/rem or dismiss it. But I think it’s a community vote, so it’s valid unlike a coop vote? — Lunar|✉ 20:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)