User talk:Thisisyourchance
I have been blocked i demand an explanation I can only assume it is on account of my African ancestry. Thisisyourchance (talk) 11:51, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- The given block reason was "annoying." Not "African." Please stop posting scams. SJ Debaser 11:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I nearly forgot...
SJ Debaser 11:53, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Is it your custom to discriminate against the sons of Africa? Please show me where I post scam, I post investment opportunity for my chosen business partners, I also offer business consultation in order for you to fulfill exponential growth of an exponential nature. Thisisyourchance (talk) 11:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I file lawsuit[edit]
under US law discrimination on the basis of race is illegal, you assume since I am Nigerian and because I offer unique investment opportunity that I am scammer, I find this offensive and racist and therefore from this moment henceforce I am bringing civil suit against the rationalwiki foundation, you racist white devils. Thisisyourchance (talk) 12:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I have discovered a conspiracy[edit]
This http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&curid=77683&diff=674956&oldid=674951 post was doctored, I never typed the word 'criminal'. Lord, this conspiracy is shrewd, I never knew Nigerians were so despised by white people. From this moment henceforth i make principle decision not to do business with you on moral grounds. If you apologise for this scam I may reconsider as I would hate to deprive you of the opportunity of making returns of 60-90% profit. Thisisyourchance (talk) 12:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I liek invest[edit]
Call me. Oh and,
How much fuinds will you like to make first of all i need your credit card details and your bank giro and an access to your personal savings account before we may proceed. Thisisyourchance (talk) 12:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I find you all racist, you think it funny for legitimate African businessman to try take or make monies? it very diffulct in this climate but I strive to provide excellent investment opportunities for my close friends. Keep up this campaign of bigotry and hatred and I will take my custom elsewhere to more reputable and business friendly websites. Thisisyourchance (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The problem is spell-ological: unfortunately a common issue. 212.85.6.26 (talk) 19:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Methinks ...[edit]
... That this is one of us. 15:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- ZOMG MC! Blue (is useful) 17:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hmmm, in that case, this could be fun....hehehehehe...(Probably not MarcusCicero, but someone that actually has a good record here)...Quacky | Talk! Scream! Share! 19:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
If I was a bureaucrat...[edit]
...I would make you a sysop and bureaucrat too, because I think you would be no trouble at all, and would offer us many exciting investment opportunities which would be aided by your crat status. As it happens, I'm not a crat, so I can't do that. Sorry. SJ Debaser 18:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe bureaucrat status could be gained in return for lucrative business opportunities. EddyP (talk) 19:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- In that case I'd do a cover of Career Opportunities by the Clash and post it here, then I'd be a bureaucrat again, which would mean sweet punani action. It would be my opening line everytime I try and chat up a girl. "Are you aware of a website called RationalWiki? Well I'm a fuckin' administrator on it! That's right baby, it's the Joshmeister." SJ Debaser 19:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- I would appreciate crat status in return for lucrative business opportunities, I could even provide discount on derivative credit default swap exchange rate systems that my organisation provides. The beauty about the modern economic system is that absolutely no one understands anything about it, and scamming is a very easy process. — Unsigned, by: Thisisyourchance / talk / contribs 11:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I have a lucrative business opportunity for you[edit]
You have been made a sysop so that you can continue you offer us all varieties business proposals. Here's my business proposal. Punky Your mental puke relief 11:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
User pages are castles...[edit]
...and only their editors may edit them. Take it elsewhere, please. P-FosterCan't we talk about this, baby? 21:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Dude[edit]
Use your own userpage if its so important to you and stop pissing everyone else off. Its that simple. Aceof Spades 21:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
RATIONAL LEAKS[edit]
Twice this has been deleted. So long as some brave souls carry the torch the truth will never die. More leaks to come in a more elegant setting.
LEAK NO.1
AMESG
AmesG to me
show details 9/26/07
In the meantime, you should check out RationalWiki. We're following your fight with interest & hilarity.
Graham Mc Namara to AmesG
show details 9/26/07
Thank you AmesG, I've been watching. I did lose the head a bit but having worked with Amnesty internation for a few years now, Burma has always been something of a pet project of mine. When my ban ends, and after I attend an emergency Dublin-based Amnesty International meeting I will respond to that idiot, and reveal him for the snivelling fool he is.
Ames Grawert to me
show details 9/26/07
Good man! You're in Amnesty International!? You're doing great work; please keep it up, and do tear Ed a new one :-P
Graham Mc Namara to Ames G
show details 9/26/07
Haha, thanks man!
Ames Grawert to me
show details 9/26/07
Just to let you know, we could really do with you over at rationalwiki. There are some people there with an insane adversion to people of religious faith. Really stupid and small minded. I sometimes think we could do with an old fashioned... 'Tribune of the people'. Do let me know.
Graham Mc Namara to Ames G
show details 9/26/07
How do you mean exactly?
Ames Grawert to me
show details 9/26/07
I'll be blunt, Graham (That is your name, right?) I want you to troll Rationalwiki. I want you to make us honest.
- So I'd believe this, cept any grownup or slightly rational person knows "trolling" doesn't make anyone more or less honest, it's just annoying. it's something 5 year olds do. I edit all the time to remove some of the more blatent anti religion on the site. no one has said "you can't do that", cause i back it up with sources. gosh, what a concept. Are you all 5? seriously?--En attendant Godot 21:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Firstly, I believe "honest" is being used in a non-literal sense, as in "throw in some broccoli to keep the fried chicken honest", rather than "the politician was honest about his affair". And in that sense, trolling could be a good thing, assuming it doesn't kill you, just like getting a cold every once in a while is better than living 40 yrs in a spotless sanitized white cell. This "leak" is strange in that it is neither damaging (Ames had the best interests of the site in mind, while MC was the one who got carried away) nor ridiculous (with the possible exception of MC being a part of AI). That being said, there's no evidence, no credibility, and even if it were true there'd be no significance. Case closed. --Talpidae (talk) 15:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
This leak was a warning shot, I believe, and Marcus did say there was around 'a dozen' altogether. It was actually quite clever of him to post a leak by a long departed by respected member, one that didn't show AmesG in a particularly bad light, but does display MCs power base, such as how he employed/was employed by powerful patrons and this was how he lasted so long. 46.7.150.116 (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- BoN, please answer your emails. Secondly, it's an interesting tactic but the message won't get across unless something of significance comes up-- it will only get the attention of the intended targets for a few minutes. If MC wants to make a splash, he should just do it already!--Talpidae (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Marcus is an excellent backroom dealer. He is pulling all kinds of strings behind the scenes, manipulating people, liasing with CP admins. Dare I say it, one doesn't make their splash unless they're sure the waves are going to be just right. 46.7.150.116 (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Isn't that interesting, MC. How do we know? What does CP have to do with this?--Talpidae (talk) 17:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- The thing about Marcus is that he is very complex. I am not MC BTW, just one of his long time admirers. According to him, he had quite a few over the years. I'm only going by what has already been written on this site about him. 46.7.150.116 (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Again, i make this observation being a woman who has worked in politically charged academics, native american law, etc... your basic threats, and your ego stroking are very much that of a 15 year old with no concept of the real world. "ohh, be scared because he is a good manipulator". If these things were/are true, he or you or it would not brag about it, they'd just do it. Think Annony with the Westborough babtist. no bragging needed. they said "shut up, and by the way, we hacked you". then moved on. I know you think you're being cool, but really, it just comes off as stupid, immature and irrelevant.--En attendant Godot 17:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Marcus is an excellent backroom dealer. He is pulling all kinds of strings behind the scenes, manipulating people, liasing with CP admins. Dare I say it, one doesn't make their splash unless they're sure the waves are going to be just right. 46.7.150.116 (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- BoN, please answer your emails. Secondly, it's an interesting tactic but the message won't get across unless something of significance comes up-- it will only get the attention of the intended targets for a few minutes. If MC wants to make a splash, he should just do it already!--Talpidae (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Marcus is fantastic and your vagina is overly large. 46.7.150.116 (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Marcus, your discreetness is wavering. Nonetheless, give credit where credit is due. He is good. For example, the few uninterested readers who happen to be passing by will believe that I am MC, and that the BoN is MC, and maybe that pixel right over there is also MC, because that's the image he's cultivated.--Talpidae (talk) 17:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)