The 2024 Legal Defense Fundraiser has ended early due to the Board's decision to settle the suit. Donations will go towards the creation of a legal defense fund. Discussion on the matter can be found at the RationalMedia Foundation noticeboard. Thank you for your generous support.

Information icon.svg Campaigning is open for the RationalWiki 2024 Board of Trustees election.

Manufactroversy

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 14:49, 19 February 2021 by Christopher (talk | contribs) (→‎top: unnecessary)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
You gotta spin it to win it
Media
Icon media.svg
Stop the presses!
We want pictures
of Spider-Man!
Extra! Extra!

A manufactroversy,[1] also known as a nontroversy,[2] is a manufactured controversy.

A manufactroversy can be a form of denialism: pretending that a controversy exists over something which is, in fact, not in debate by anyone who has the slightest grasp of the facts, but which a number of people wish to deny for religious, political, or other reasons. The usual motive for this is to attempt to give the appearance that the facts are still up for debate, à la anti-environmentalism. Another kind is the manufactured "scandal": blowing a non-issue out of proportion.

Often related to the "tell both sides" method of reporting, where only one side has any evidence, so the reporter searches out a crank just so they can tell another side.

This concept is also illustrated through what one editor would describe as "fill-in-the-blank outrage" by Christian fundamentalists in the United States. Examples of this include fundie leaders suddenly declaring things as diverse as environmentalism, feminism, gay rights, universal health care, etc. to be threats to Christianity, unscriptural, unholy, or some other version of "wahhh" when there is no indication that Christians as a whole considered these things threatening over the nearly 2000 years of the religion's existence. Until just now, of course.[3]

The term "swiftboating" is often used in American media due to the bullshit smear campaign against John Kerry launched by the organization "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth."[4] Despite the name, it has nothing to do with Phil Swift sawing a boat in half (or truth, for that matter).

Common examples

Most damaging

Half-assed stunts

  • Obama citizenship denial. He produced his birth certificate, so they demanded his long-form certificate. When he coughed that one up, it was deemed to be fake. A double false flag operation, oldest trick in the Kenyan book.
  • Benghazi, which while a real and terrible event, was vaguely-gestured at as a scandal without much attention to what the exact wrongdoing was.
  • Chemtrails
  • The War on Christmas and other claims that Christians are a persecuted minority in the Christian West[6]
  • Wind Turbine Syndrome
  • Piggate, a rumor about David Cameron that lots of people wanted to be true but there was no evidence for
  • Jeremy Corbyn's "treasonous behaviour" such as a tabloid scandal over his bowing technique (only in deferential Britain!)[7] which mirrored the earlier Michael Foot donkey-jacket-that-wasn't non-scandal of 1981[8]
  • Non-issue yawners or other non-events being turned into the scandal of the week (see Ward Churchill, ACORN, Dick Duck Dynasty), particularly by 24-hour rolling news coverage needing to fill time when there's no real news from your locale and no desire to pay attention to the rest of the world.
  • Any of many other moral panics, too numerous to list.

To take the first three examples, in order: evolution (together with common descent) is one of the best-tested and most successful scientific theories. There is no evidence that vaccines cause autism[9] or any other harm, and overwhelming evidence that they save lives. Global warming is happening and can be measured, and the cause has consistently been proven to be human. However, how to mitigate it remains up for debate; interestingly, denialists tend to ignore this part.

See also

References

  1. Ceccarelli, Leah. "Manufactroversy, The Art of Creating Controversy Where None Existed", Science Progress. Spring/Summer 2008: 82-84.
  2. Peters, Mark (January 18, 2010). "The Age of the Nontroversy". GOOD.
  3. Were one cynical, one might posit that these fundies are being manipulated by their leaders and by political opportunists in order to further ideological goals or to sucker money out of the masses. But when has that ever been an issue?
  4. Swiftboating, Taegan Goddard's Political Dictionary
  5. Some examples
  6. A good question: Are Christians persecuted in Britain?, Reform Magazine, Oct 2013
  7. Jeremy Corbyn's bow: what really happened, The Guardian, 9 Nov 2015
  8. Michael Foot and the donkey jacket that wasn't, The Telegraph, 3 Mar 2010
  9. The only scientific paper ever to be published to this effect was of very low quality and has since been retracted. Its author has been "struck off," i.e. prohibited from practising medicine.