RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3630Goal: $5000

Abiotic oil

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Style over substance
Pseudoscience
Icon pseudoscience.svg
Popular pseudosciences
Random examples

The abiotic oil hypothesis proposes that a small amount of oil originates from non-biological origins. Research on the topic is ongoing; however, oilempire.us has noted the hypothesis as "wishful thinking" and a way to ignore "resource limits".[1]

Outline of the hypothesis[edit]

The theory's adherents believe that oil originated as carbon monoxide and hydrogen gas rising through the deep layers of the Earth's crust. If this mixture was lucky enough to find zirconium-containing minerals, it could react and produce petroleum hydrocarbons. Some of these would move close enough to the surface to be exploitable by humanity.

This idea seems plausible because:

Cranks argue that some hydrocarbons are formed inorganically; therefore all hydrocarbons are formed inorganically.

Alternative scenarios[edit]

  • Immanuel Velikovsky suggested in his book Worlds in Collision (1950) that oil was extraterrestrial in origin and came from comets.
  • Velikovsky follower Robert W. Felix puts his own spin on this with hydrocarbon nano-diamonds raining down from the sky as a result of pole shifts.
  • Jeffrey Wolynski proposed that oil and natural gas formation was a direct result of polymerization of hydrocarbons during intermediate stages of stellar evolution. The oil/natural gas rained down into the interior of the evolving star which was then subsequently trapped via crust deposition.[4].

Views in the world[edit]

The hypothesis by itself is is not pseudoscience; however, cranks peddle the hypothesis as a fact, and this is psuedoscientific. In the West, the hypothesis is treated as it is, a hypothesis; however, petroleum researchers and Russian geologists do not.[5] The bastardization of the hypothesis has been used to push climate change denial arguments and ignore a diminishing amount of limited resources.

Supporters[edit]

  1. Rush Limbaugh
  2. Jerome Corsi, who wrote a book, Black Gold Stranglehold, promoting the idea.
  3. George Noory promotes it from time to time.
  4. viewzone.com
  5. rense.com

External links[edit]

References[edit]