RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/2020 Republican Party presidential nomination

2020 Republican Party presidential nomination | Result: Merged with and redirected to 2020 U.S. presidential election

2020 Republican Party presidential nomination (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Not Missional, not notable, not even interesting. It's just "A bunch of C-listers who had no chance of beating Trump did not, in fact, beat Trump." Flandres (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Boring, useless, encyclopedic and borderline listicle. If someone wants to know more about the subject they can just Google it. GeeJayK (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
3. Nobody is going to use this. Its relevancy is gone, and nobody is ever going to update it. Easy delete. armed_roomba (she/her)^{What am I doing wrong this time?} 17:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
4. BeardOfZeus (talk) 04:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Keep

1. We have 2016 Republican Party presidential nomination, 2016 Democratic Party presidential nomination and 2020 Democratic Party presidential nomination. These pages are fairly decently missional in helping us cover US politicians otherwise not warranting their own pages. Opposing removal. -- Techpriest (talk) 09:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

   Those articles saw contestants who had opposition. Trump got all but one delegate in this case and Bill Weld didn’t even come close. It doesn’t need a standalone. I’m ok with merging, or with just redirection, but I oppose it getting a standalone article. Andrew5 mobile (talk) 10:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

1. Redirect (possibly merge, this I'm neutral on) into 2020 U.S. presidential election. No need for a standalone article, but the content might be useful and its best to keep the history intact. Time change coming up November 7, Andrew5 (talk) 19:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Rockford the Roe ^{boop my snoot}_{praise Oscar Wilde} 19:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
3. Scream!! (talk) 19:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
4. I'm in favor of streamlining the content in this article and merging the best bits into 2020 U.S. presidential election. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
5. What they said. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 21:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
6. Merge as the whole Trump won the election thing is clearly on topping. BruceGrubb (talk) 23:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
7. Though I doubt anybody is going to care about this information in a few years.Bob^{"Life is short and (insert adjective)"} 08:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)