RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Cognitive differences between sexes

Cognitive differences between sexes | Result: Keep

Cognitive differences between sexes (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. It's shit. Hedvigsen^{Skreonk here} 10:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
2. Ripe enough to be deleted. Justarandomliberal (talk) 16:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep

1. It's a well researched article with a lot of references. It's on topic by virtue of this being a subject that sexists like to point at. I see no argument for deletion. Techpriest ^{(I am Alpharius! / / / )} 10:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
2. I fail to see any real issues.𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 (𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰) (𝔰𝔠𝔯𝔦𝔭𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔞) 16:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
3. Flandres (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
4. Instead of deleting it, methinks we should just add in some snark, a few improvements, and possibly also a section debunking claims made by sexists (both misogynist and misandrist alike but mostly the former) attempting to use the cognitive differences to "prove" why one sex is better than the other. Furthermore, it's worth noting that this article has been already been around for years. As others have already said, I see no meaningful argument for getting rid of this. --Goatspeed. _{Stalk me}CircularRasoning^{See my latest prototypes} 01:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
5. Needs a compelling reason to delete. Article looks fine to me, albeit in need of more RW style. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 03:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
6. It's well-sourced. As DuceMoosolini said, we need a better reason than 'It's shit' or 'ripe enough'. Bongolian (talk) 05:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
7. Everyone already made the points, no need to repeat them. — 𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭 ^{talk stalk}14:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
8. There doesn't seem to be any valid argument to delete this article. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 15:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)