RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/National Autistic Society

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

National Autistic Society | Result: 8 votes for delete in 24 hours, Deleted[edit]

National Autistic Society (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)


  1. Not missional (accusations of supporting pseudoscience are unfounded), closer to a bullet point list than an article. All of the citations which link to the organisation’s website are dead, and half of the rest are blog/youtube links (the first is a tweet from the author). Inexplicably criticises the organisation for making videos featuring “a white/white passing person”. Christopher (talk) 16:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  2. Put it out of its misery. Gangster Computer God (talk) 16:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  3. its arseAMassiveGay (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  4. Unfortunatey, I think there's little hope for most of the articles written by this user. I don't think they've acted in bad faith. If they've stayed for longer, they could've learned better how to write a RW article. But I think it's common here to mistake RW's non-neutral POV with just expressing your personal views while writing an article. GeeJayK (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  5. 𝒮𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑒 talk 22:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  6. Needs a rewrite. Celeste (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  7. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 02:31, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
  8. Not a good treatment of the subject. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 02:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)


  1. It's not horrible. Gale5050 (talk) 17:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


  1. How many more autism articles are we going to keep removing? It's poorly written but it can be revamped. Just put it in the draftspace oven. PoorlyDrawnRockford.jpeg Rockford the Roe boop my snootpraise Oscar Wilde 17:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
    The author (who wrote a lot of bad autism articles, hence all the AfDs) has left the site; if it’s moved to draftspace, it’ll sit there forever and eventually get deleted anyway. The entire basis for writing this article is that the org failed to acknowledge an unsuccessful change.org petition, it’s off-mission as well as being poorly written. Christopher (talk) 18:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
    it being poorly written is not the main problem with page. the main problem is it is mostly bullshit AMassiveGay (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2021 (UTC)