User talk:Hastur/archive10

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


You're right, it was very good, even if you're a leftist. Or at least, not a hard-core leftist, in which case it's very offensive indeed to suggest that we should be allowed to use pronouns. --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 23:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

You must have misread my edit summary. I disliked Anthem. I also don't feel that the article should contain such subjective opinions.--"Shut up, Brx." 00:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

ED Wiki[edit]

I created a wiki all about ED in the ethos of RWW. I imagine you know more about ED's subculture than I ever will, I would like you to come and help. Also, I know you know how it feels to have no editors on a wiki, I am inviting you to come and contribute. Srsly, please come. Thanks, (talk) 19:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

I know you know how it feels to have no editors at a wiki How would I know that? The only wikis I've edited are ED, Conservapedia, and RationalWiki. These are all active wikis with many contributors (with the possible exception of Conservapedia). Second of all, you'd do better making an account over at ED and asking there (although this may just inspire a vandalism spree). You could also ask Michaeldsuarez, who is User:JuniusThaddeus on ED to contribute. He likes wikis, he might put in a few articles for you if you catch his fancy, although he dislikes attention whoring and blogging- so he may be turned off by your premise. Personally, I have little interest in your endeavor. I have limited attention to give out, and I don't feel capable of being active on yet another wiki--"Shut up, Brx." 00:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

"Please don't block's annoying"[edit]

So, you go round the place being annoying, and you ask to not have an annoying thing done to you. What's that about? SophieWilder 09:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Apart from merely existing, what have I done to annoy you? Please, be specific.--"Shut up, Brx." 09:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
the most annoying thing is that you don't listen. even being told to shut up isn't some kind of warning that you've erred; instead you make it a badge of pride by making it your sig. You continually present yourself as someone who's here just to poke people, and take any reaction as a mark of acceptance. SophieWilder 09:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
That's not a "badge of pride." That's been the only effective way to stop Mikalos and ArchieGoodwin spamming Brx every time I say anything at all regardless of what I say. Think of it as stealing their thunder. And I do listen. I listen quite a bit. I thought about shoring up some links to prove it but I'm really not in the mood to trawl through talk page archives--"Shut up, Brx." 22:41, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
I feel honored to be consistently listed, especially since ultimately i don't dislike you, you just annoy me brx. also using "Shut up, Brx." as a sig doesn't actually stop me from using it you know. --Mikal Harass Follow 18:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


Shut up. Let things calm down a bit. -- Nx / talk 13:55, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Yeah. I'm gonna go play video games or clean my apartment or something.--"Shut up, Brx." 13:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Take this for what it's worth.[edit]

I am sorry for the way I have treated you here over the past year or so. I may not like you--or at least, your e-persona, and I may not think much of your contributions to the wiki. But that is no excuse for being a jerk. If someone on the Metro was really annoying me, I wouldn't try to annoy them back--I would get up and move to the next car. That's being an adult. If I can be an adult in real life, I can probably be one on the internet. Bien à vous, P. Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out. 01:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


I should have said dick or cock instead. Naca (talk) 06:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

I've personally taken a liking to gender-neutral insults, such as asshole or shithead--"Shut up, Brx." 06:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
I decided on wanker, although i'm guessing it's jacking off (when gods not looking) in his case rather than jilling off Naca (talk) 06:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
It's fitting. Ken is definitely a wanker, whether it's over pictures of Chuck Norris' "svelte" figure or over imagined evangelical campaigns that are on the verge of crushing atheism--"Shut up, Brx." 06:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Actually, Nx, I haven't done jacksquat. These attacks came completely out of nowhere[edit]

Not for my part. I was recently reminded of what filth you are because the board is trying to work out securing board elections after you and Nx monkeyed with the mod election with your sockpuppet voting. So let's ask Trent if you've done jack squat. People need to know there are reasons I find you to be an intolerable slime beyond your social failings and lying about me and my friends to stir up political shit. Shame on you for always playing the victim. You deserve every bit of abuse you get if you can't muster the decency to just leave a place you're barely tolerated after all the trouble you caused. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 13:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, yes. I read your vague accusations at the coop. No need to spam it across the wiki--"Shut up, Brx." 13:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
It's a very specific accusation. Do you by any chance have narcissistic personality disorder? Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 13:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


WTF? are you doing? Acei9 20:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out. 01:42, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
You know, you're on my blacklist, but I'll make an exception because I'm in such a good mood and because I don't detect any hint of malice or condescension in your post: thank you, I appreciate it. Very topical song.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Haha, 'black list'. Acei9 01:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Sincerely--congrats. For reals. As for the rest of that: you never responded to my post above, and I'm not asking you to, but I am trying to be more of a grown-up online and a better guy in real life. It ain't always easy, but stuff worth doing rarely is. Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out. 01:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


I apologize, for being a douche to you, for pretty much the entire time. --Mikal Harass Follow 06:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


Now that I've found my way here I'll make what meager contributions that I'm capable of (and thanks for easing that!) on a variety of topics but it's probably apparent that I've got major wood for secessionists and their whole bizarre worldview. I did look about to see if I could suggest, propose or arbitrarily create a category on "secessionism" but did not find the grail. Got any advice? ThomasRowley (talk) 04:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Start here. Click the link and begin the article. Other users will come in on the talk page and give you tips. I think an article on secessionists would be quite relevant for this wiki, and it should probably be well-received.--"Shut up, Brx." 05:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Thx. I think I have a take on putting together articles on, say, the Second Vermont Republic. My query had more to do with establishment of a category specific to secessionist groups, organizations, leaders, etc. For instance, the League of the South a secessionist enterprise with the usual website, meetings, book club and such is labeled under categories on RW as "Categories: Hate groups/Organizations/Paleoconservatism/Racism," but nothing specific to secessionism. Given the broad tableau of, to varying degrees, ineffectual yet vocal secessionist groups, is a separate category bearing the title "Secessionist" appropriate for RW? Some of the leaders of these groups are, um, colorful enough to warrant inclusion under a "secessionist" category, in my estimation. T. ThomasRowley (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


Good idea about using the public broadcast system. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 14:04, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess I'm pretty awesome...--"Shut up, Brx." 14:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep it up and I'll block you![edit]

  • Damn it, you meanie, stop being a vandal or I'll report you to the Florida Department of Agriculture and I'll call the FBI on you! I am mighty powerful, you shall bow down to me! Falalalala! Vampire Wars (talk) 14:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Nothing better to do with your Thursday, D?--"Shut up, Brx." 14:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
When I was in high school, instead of telling the the IT person about Rational-Wiki and some of its questionable content so he could block it, I should have told the immature kids about it and its changeability. High School Graduate (talk) 15:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

a fellow policy debater?[edit]

Indeed! Or at least I was, when I realized that it's an annoying game where the truth and honesty does not matter, only winning. LiberalOfAnUnknownVariant (talk) 06:44, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Dude, that's what makes it so awesome! --"Shut up, Brx." 06:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
My high school team was the best. Need to solve for privacy? Get everyone high on lithium via the drinking water, which lowers their need for privacy, thereby raising - relatively mind you - their effective privacy. Need to solve for higher academic achievement? Get everyone high on lithium via the drinking water, which lowers suicide rates, which increases academic achievement. Repeat ad nauseum. Oh, I loved the guy who ran that plan.
One of the highlights of my time was probably when I saw the president (before I became president later) run 20+ topicality arguments in a single round, just to be a huge douche / just to be made of win and god. He basically ran a topicality on every single word of the proposition, more than one for a few words too. Don't even get me started on the time machine counterplan. LiberalOfAnUnknownVariant (talk) 06:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Oh, nothing is better than seeing a Lincoln-Douglas guy in the hotel standing 3 ft from a wall, facing it, yelling at it and being all animated while doing so. If I wasn't in a debate gathering, I would consider calling the police! LiberalOfAnUnknownVariant (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Moderator elections[edit]

Moderator elections are upcoming. I'm interested in supporting a slate of candidates that would actually use the moderator tools to uphold the reason that I read this wiki (specifically, that it's the best source I can find that cuts right to the basic chase about various woo, and it's the best tracker of lols to watch on conservapedia). I am dismayed that the process to get rid of crankmeisters and trolls who support lunacy on the internet basically is "ignore them and hope they leave." Addendum - this was too broad. Should read "the process to get rid of crankmeisters and trolls who support lunacy on the internet and drive well-meaning, on mission contributors away per below discussionHipocrite (talk) 18:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

You appear to share my general views based on your essay regarding sysop rights. While I am quite aware who to vote against, it's not clear who one is supposed to vote for for moderator. Please provide hints in private. Thanks! Hipocrite (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I have a problem with your above dissertation: this Wiki has always welcomed various crankmeisters to come here and debate with us. In fact, it still says that we do on the main page. While I don't support giving them sysop rights at all, I think it is detrimental to this community to ban people outright simply because they are cranks. On the contrary, I like having someone show up and challenge us, because it allows us to hone our reasoning against whatever nonsense they are trying to promote. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 18:44, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
There's a difference between "come here and debate with us" and [1]. There's a difference between "come here and debate with us" and [2]. You explain to me how "Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement, Documenting the full range of crank ideas, Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism and Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media," are supported by letting this guy harass female editors here. I'm not talking about banning everyone who disagrees with us, I'm talking about the ones who drive people who agree with us away. Hipocrite (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
^ THIS. Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out. 19:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm middle of the road. I want us to actually protect our editors, but i think we can do that without banning. I seriously think you say "ok, that's one, and here's a warning. next time, a 3 day block. after that a 1 week block. after that a 1 month block, then a permiban". idon't think you block them for 3 months at first. I also think you have to be careful of "what a fucking annoying ass who doesn't listen to anything we say", and people who speak offensively to others (and are also fucking annoying asses). It's a hard road, but it's not impossible, and it is not nearly the "oh my god, the wiki is run by controlfreaks" that some would make it out to be. Green mowse.pngGodot She was a venus demilo in her sister's jeans 20:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
^ and ^^ Bring back Fibonacci? Humorless fascistsociopath 20:21, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Fibonacci would good if it was there in special:blockuser. SophieWilder 20:41, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
And that whole child abuser guy. THAT should NEVER be allowed here. seriously, there is no reason to print someone's words who says it's ok to have sex with kids, just cause "we don't delete talk pages" or whatever the excuse was. Green mowse.pngGodot She was a venus demilo in her sister's jeans 20:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I seem to share your views, Hipocrite, but I'm the wrong car to hitch your wagon to. I'm this car (small pic, but only one I could find online. One of these days I'll get a scanner). What I can suggest is that you cast your vote and support the following candidates: Blue, Nx, Pi, DickTurpis, Armondikov, ListenerX, and Tielec01. These are the people least likely to play favorites and go soft on their buddies, the least likely to have meltdowns, and the most likely to be proactive with their user rights. Of course, they may not all run. Pi, for example, will probably choose not to run. So as an alternate, AD will do, but you really prefer the seven I mentioned. These are the people who are right for this wiki (a six to one gender ratio, but what are you gonna do? There are only, like, five active women here or something, and Blue's the only one that's been consistently anti-troll).--"Shut up, Brx." 06:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
The blunt truth: Brxbrx is the "wrong car" to back because for a year-long period he was the most-despised troll on RationalWiki. He's tolerable now, but no one who remembers that will vote for him as Moderator. Blue is wicked smart except when it comes to wikipolitics, and often takes actions that have a mandate of nil behind them. Nx used his socks to vote multiple times in the last Mod election, and in any electoral system with sense, would never be allowed to run again. (He technically still can, unfortunately, but don't expect him to win.) AD and WaitingforGodot are the two fairest, most even-handed candidates for Mod, but Brxbrx will only grudgingly endorse them (if at all) because they were both critical of him during his trolling days. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 06:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Stabby... You were inactive for most of my stay here, and when you popped back in you immediately hopped on the brxhate bandwagon. You never substantiate any of your accusations against me, and frankly, if you could drop you stupid prejudices, we could get along alright and find that we have a lot in common.
I had forgotten about Nx's sockpuppets. Unfortunate. I still think Blue is the best choice for moderator, though, and the few times she's exceeded her privileges was either because of serious provocation (like when Human posted emails she sent him) or she was enforcing order with her tech powers instead of her moderator powers.
WaitingforGodot is not a good moderator. She is a bad moderator. Her laissez-faire attitude, a symptom of the endemic cronyism and butt-kissing present on this site, means she never does anything, ever. She tends to side with established trolls, and has also said she would be a hands off moderator, if at all. AD is too soft and not proactive, and will cave under pressure from his internet friends, for fear of upsetting them.
Hipocrite, I'm sorry for dragging you into this. I can imagine having to read me and Stabby talking about this is dismaying. This is why I am the "wrong car." I'm deeply tied into a lot of crap with different users. When the time comes, support (nominate, campaign, vote) for the candidates I named (except Nx, I changed my mind), and try not to enter grudges and feuds. Also, when I say trolls, I don't just mean Brasov and Dirk Steele. I also mean certain longtime users, some of which have achieved a measure of popularity, who I see as toxic to the community and creating a hostile environment (they're trolls, but not necessarily the ones you had in mind)--"Shut up, Brx." 07:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Templeton foundation.[edit]

Edit warring doesn't seem to be very productive. Perhaps try another tack? Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made." 03:29, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Check the article on Mother Teresa and the sources to see if she did real charity work or pretended to help poor people. Proxima Centauri (talk) 11:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Sterile for mod[edit]


Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 22:03, 26 December 2012 (UTC)


What was the point of this? What must I "try again"? Acei9 20:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

No explanation? It is a legitimate question. Acei9 20:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Oh I see what you did there. But you did it all wrong, no? Acei9 20:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

WTF are you on about?[edit]

I haven't been here for quite some time, and all of a sudden that!--Baloney Detection (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Just a general message/request to you and Dmitry--"Shut up, Brx." 03:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

RE: The anti racist page[edit]

I see your point about it. However, it would also be offensive to idiots who actually believe in racism and that sort of crap. I can think of a different approach to making fun of them. ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 07:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Bro, really?[edit]

I have seen pics of you and pics of Nutty and this sort of comment does not work in your favour. Acei9 08:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

"Are you gonna get WIGO talk:RW?"[edit]

Most of it is here, if not all. You probably didn't see me bring it in as I was in bot mode. I've brought in lots of talk page stuff from around RWW, but not user talk. If you want anything else from there, you'll have to do it, just slap on [[Category:RationalWikiWiki]] when you paste it here so anyone who's interested can find it. SophieWilder 22:14, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I just wanted to keep the slashfic "contest." I found it quite entertaining. And it's there! Yay. Thank you, Sophie--"Shut up, Brx." 22:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


I am in Cordoba and today I checked out the synagogue. Anything else you'd like while I'm here? Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 20:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Pick me up some gachas and ajoblanco.--"Shut up, Brx." 22:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

you think[edit]

im on his side? im on neither, but Doing an abusive block "because i know you were about too" isnt helping yourself. --MikallakiM 15:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I know you're on his side. Even though he's consistently treated you like dirt, you still want to be part of the in-group. And it's really sad.--"Shut up, Brx." 15:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Part of his in-group? why? That ship sailed when i favored a somewhat more structured approach to running a website over an anarchy-based model. --MikallakiM 15:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
You still don't understand. Structure for the sake of structure is cool for aspies. It's what you thrive on. But anarchy doesn't mean a free-for-all. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 15:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
It's a free-for-you...--"Shut up, Brx." 15:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Nor do I think thats what it is or that we should have rules for the sake of rules. The anarchy-model works, but past a certain group size I feel that a more structured, even if only a bit, organization is better for keeping things going smoothly. --MikallakiM 15:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Brx, I will remove your rights and block you if you keep deleting that page. I don't care if you think I'm an "attention whore." There's nothing wrong with putting something up about your own birthday. Stop it. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 15:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

You'll do it for a lot less. I can see my block log and my user rights log. You probably won't do it today because you don't want to seem predictable, but you will do it again, and someone will have to step in and restore my rights. Because you're a douchebag--"Shut up, Brx." 15:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
You two, get a room.--ZooGuard (talk) 16:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Bitcoin[edit]

What exactly would you like me to explain? The statements I changed were simply wrong.— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

I'd like to see some discussion of this on the article's talk page. BoN.62's edits seemed harmless enough, and I found it puzzling to see them reverted. For now, I can't call it one way or the other. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 18:47, 24 March 2013 (UTC)


Why are you creating accounts with long names? –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Inquisitor Behrenstein[edit]

I gave up talking about that. What? I stopped so now you need to continue it? –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

We know you're a troll, and we'd like for you to go away. You haven't actually broken any rules or done something offensive enough to warrant a block, but that doesn't mean we aren't on to you, and that you aren't annoying. Go away. The jig is up.--"Shut up, Brx." 19:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I am not a troll. For one thing, I realized what I was doing was a problem and I'm stopping. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Yeah. And posting a link to a neo-Nazi website was totally a good faith attempt at providing an alternative to our current skin. You lack subtlety.--"Shut up, Brx." 19:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I posted a link to a Nazi website? Please show where. Please provide the specific revision link. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
We're done here--"Shut up, Brx." 19:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
And yet, I don't see a Nazi website. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I did see one that Nazis have ranted against as being run by "Jewish Bolsheviks" despite the fact that at least one of the admins there is a libertarian capitalist, and all are atheists. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Totally a Nazi song. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Brx, your first comment above seems remarkably similar to the sort of things people used to say to you. Quit throwing your weight around. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Difference is, I was right. I didn't make topics just to piss people off.--"Shut up, Brx." 21:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
"We know you're a troll, and we'd like for you to go away. You haven't actually broken any rules or done something offensive enough to warrant a block, but that doesn't mean we aren't on to you, and that you aren't annoying. Go away. The jig is up."
Are you talking about that one? If so, LOL. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 20:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, look through this page's archives & Chicken Coop archives & you'll find similar comments directed at Brx. WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 21:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Not really a troll[edit]

A troll is someone who intentionally sets out to create discord. This guy is'nt trying to piss people off, he is just clueless as to how to conduct himself around other people and has zero idea of what counts as appropriate. That doesn't make his conduct any more tolerable, but I don't think it's possible for him to go more than a short time without making a serious faux pas. Inspiration Move me brightly. 21:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

The informality and sarcasm created a bit of awkwardness for me. Otherwise, it was getting stuck on the same subject. On more "serious" wikis, it isn't a problem.–Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 21:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
No, that's not it. Either English isn't your first language, you are severely retarded, or you are a child. Hipocrite (talk) 20:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Or, Weegee is out to get you.--Thrinaxodon (talk) 01:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

There's more to reality than Imperialists are wrong and evil/former colonial subjects must be right[edit]

That's fascinating. Show me where I've expressed any interest in the Falklands Islands article besides copy-editing. I have no dog in that fight -- this is about Prodigal's behavior, not the article. Did he doubt/Or did he try? 23:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

"edit-warring with you on one article and offending your Anglophile sensibilities"
Admittedly, I may have read a little too much into that, but you seemed to object to Prodigal's stance based largely on his perceived pro-Britain point of view--"Shut up, Brx." 23:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
No. I objected to his stance of calling a user a "troll" because his politics differed. He's the one who dragged "the British" into the discussion, not me. That's all. Did he doubt/Or did he try? 23:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Also, I think "my posts won't matter and will be ignored"should be your new sig. Did he doubt/Or did he try? 23:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Very well. Let us put the matter to rest and hope for a swift and fair resolution to all of this over at both ATIM and Falkland Islands. And no, this signature isn't changing until Template:Brx is deleted--"Shut up, Brx." 23:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I'll give it a few days, see if it sticks, then I'll change my sig--"Shut up, Brx." 23:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
EC Pay up, motherfucker. Did he doubt/Or did he try? 23:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Never mind then. . .[edit]

My apologies. It was dripping with butt-clenching bitterness and bile, in marked contrast to older work on the page, and had extreme factual errors. I assumed the section in question was the work of a vandal. I didn't realize it was a work of the mob. I'll be on my way. ModerateYourTone (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Alex Jones[edit]

Okay. But you gotta admit it's the truth. Sorry, but I've heard conspiracy theorists (my sister being one) but this guy takes the retard cake. Darth Kieduss the Wise (talk) 05:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)


Since the community embraced a months long block against Mikemikev, I'm blocking you infinitely because your behavior is worse. You've got a long record of trolling RW and acting against its interests, so we're done here. Go write about "===Surviving a nigger attack=== [[File:Blackguywhitegirl.jpeg|thumb|right|After getting a pure white virgin drunk, a negro moves in for the kill]]" Don't want to hear some nonsense about ED being about offensive "humor" when by that standard you might as well go over to Stormfront and play along with their jokes too. After all, someone else says it's supposed to be funny, so jump right in! Go [ lie about all RW because you realized you shouldn't have picked a fight with a few of the wrong people. You know very well that I'm the only one who Photoshopped cocks onto things, that I did it rarely, and that people had a strong reaction to you from the very beginning because you are you. That's not trolling. Later on, scumbag. Ugh it ruined my morning to find an email about you in my inbox. Just ruined it. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 14:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Good lord, you're pathetic. Got bored and decided to trawl through my edits at ED, huh? You find this vendetta of yours entertaining?
Yeah, I made an edit to Encyclopaedia Dramatica. Almost two fucking years ago. Jesus Christ, man, get a life. (side note: I know you're claiming you received a mysterious email from a concerned anonymous informant. But you're full of shit)--"Shut up, Brx." 15:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
I never claimed it was an anonymous internet informant. LOL. RW people compare you to douchecanoes who don't understand our culture and who bitch when they're taken to school for making unnecessary waves. Nice non-response though. I didn't start this, but I'll finish it since you haven't said a single meaningful thing about the bullshit you've done to mess with RW or these edits evidencing a true lack of character, however long ago you made them. You haven't changed. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 19:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


Gene, wait!!! Why don't you lay down that cowbell... with us. Together. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 08:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


Hey guys, I put my pants on just like the rest of ya: one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on I make gold records. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 06:20, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 07:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

I'll be honest with you, buddy....[edit]

"I really could've used more cowbell."

My condolences[edit]

I saw on Recent Changes that your grandfather passed away. Just stopping by to give you my condolences. Wehpudicabok (talk) 07:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Appreciated--"Shut up, Brx." 12:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Mine as well. Dying sucks. Bon courage. Faced with mysteries dark and vast/statements just seem vain at last. 15:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Aerospace job[edit]

Ever apply for that aerospace job? If so, you may want to read up on FOD awareness. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

I mean this constructively[edit]

  • Wash your face
  • Grow a larger beard. If you can't than try one just on your chin
  • Comb your hair, maybe grow it longer so it isn't flat
  • Possibly trim your eyebrows

Александр(а) Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 04:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

(show/hide) 01:16, 21 June 2013 Brxbrx (Talk | contribs | block) blocked XIJVelva (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 day (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Spambot) (unblock | change block)[edit]

...and he came back soon thereafter. Don't be afraid to use the big guns, son. If I knew the way/I would take you home. 04:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


I wonder who is more hated, me or you? I'm a hero of the proletariat, you are a servant of the regime. Let the ballot box sing its rhyme, for she is the final arbiter. MarcusCicero (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Why are we wasting time fighting amongst ourselves - isn't the enemy of my enemy, my friend? It has long been the tactics of the establishment to sow discord amongst the repressed; to make us squabble over our most minor of differences while they, in the dark, run roughshod over our rights. The time to act like roosters in the hen house is when the revolution has achieved it's ends... but no sooner. Tielec01 (talk) 05:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
See Brx, when it really boils down to it, you're an even bigger nobhead than me. MarcusCicero (talk) 20:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Are you an Israeli?[edit]

Excuse me if you don't want me to delve into your private life, but are you an Israeli? From the picture you posted on your user page you look somewhat similar to someone I know IRL. - ConservapediaMarkman (talk) 01:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I am a Frenchman, and as far back as anyone in my family has bothered to look, all my ancestors have been French peasants--"Shut up, Brx." 02:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
So no change there. :D Steven Kavanagh (talk) 08:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
But do you have an outrageous accent? Lancez la vache! If I knew the way/I would take you home. 14:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Oh well. Funny that you're French though as the guy I was speaking about studied at an Alliance school. - ConservapediaMarkman (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


"Trust me, you're gonna really want that cowbell."

Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 06:58, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Please help[edit]

There's this BoN who constantly removes huge chunk of info from The American Dream (film). I tried reverting him but he's very persistent so there's not much I can do. Tried warning him on his talk page but he just blanked it. Can you block this IP or something? - Vote Markman for a better tomorrow! (talk) 19:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Nevermind, it's been taken care of by someone else. - Vote Markman for a better tomorrow! (talk) 19:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Supression log[edit]

This should explain. Hipocrite 16:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, although I think that's tech/mod level, as I can't access it. Which makes me think IE shouldn't be a tech (I always thought that, of course, but I didn't want to bother speaking out).--"Shut up, Brx." 16:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Worthless troll. Someone with your record is in no position to lecture anyone on policy or say who and who shouldn't have whatever rights. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 16:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
no u--"Shut up, Brx." 16:43, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
I was suppressing personal information. Is that legitmate, or should it be kept public? –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 16:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

'Sup buddy?[edit]

Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 04:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Vicky 2[edit]

perhaps these can at all help with it? theres another, informative LP i read but its locked under archives now--Mikal | lakiM 06:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

The Dems are less likely to cave....[edit]

...before the majority of House Republicans go read Boner the riot act and tell him to stop bending over for 30-40 Tea Party nuts. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.Moderator 03:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

I hope you're right.--"Shut up, Brx." 03:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey buddy!![edit]

I found something that you might find helpful. No need to thank me. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Men and cats[edit]

I saw this & thought of you. ŴêâŝêîôîďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 00:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

It's not my fault Stebe is camera-shy...--"Shut up, Brx." 00:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your revert to my edit[edit]

Just wondering why you reverted my edit. There was opportunity in the talk page over several days to object to it. Nobody objected. Kels even wrote "I don't really mind it that much". Perhaps you could explain in the talk page. Cheers. --Laird (talk) 02:09, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

I was just about to do it. You haven't established a consensus and your version seems like a white-wash. Don't confuse silence with consensus, remember this is not the other wiki. That's not to say you aren't on the right track to get things changed - I think we need a bit more consultation here. Tielec01 (talk) 02:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
With less contextomy, Kels wrote, " seems a bit of a whitewash and removes pretty much all the snark so there's not much heart to it, but on the other hand I don't really mind it that much. Rome isn't really worth that much effort." For the most part, I agree with that. Alec Sanderson (talk) 02:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Tielec01, I hope we can have a conversation about this if/when you do open one up on the talk page. Alec, I'm sorry if it seems I was quoting out of context, it seemed to me that Kels was saying that even if my edit wasn't perfect in his eyes, it was acceptable enough to him - if I've misinterpreted, then I'm open to correction. I hope that you will contribute to any conversation on the talk page about this change. --Laird (talk) 02:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
FYI, "... wasn't perfect in her eyes" would be more correct. Unless I see something egregious that others are missing, I will probably just watch the discussion unfold. Trustworthy RationalWikians are on the case, IMO. Alec Sanderson (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Apologies to Kels. --Laird (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)