This talk page is like the aftermath of the 1391 massacre of Jews in Cordova

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive[edit]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7


Hmm[edit]

According to stalker central, every time someone edits this you get an email. Is that true? The unbusinesslikeman of business 01:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, yes it's true. And I find it very annoying. I would disable the function but I find it even more annoying not being notified of edits to my talk page. Please try and anticipate your replies to my replies and the replies of others in your initial post in order to minimize the amount of edits I get emailed about. </joke>--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Or you could just, you know, check the site every once in a while rather than fill your inbox. The unbusinesslikeman of business 02:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Heheh.--ADtalkModerator 02:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I've been through this. Try archive number two.--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh, AD, you know where it hurts and you know how to twist the knife... --User:Brxbrx/sig 02:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Do you really get an email everytime? Aceace 02:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Every time, Ace. Do it like AD and make every comment take fifteen edits.--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:25, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Really? Aceace 02:25, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Yup.--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
how about that. Aceace 02:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Every time?[edit]

Remarkable. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 02:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Truly Remarkable. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 02:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
It is. The unbusinesslikeman of business 02:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Isn't it? The unbusinesslikeman of business 02:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
John Childermass, you are worse than a bigoted Spaniard in 1391 Cordova for resurrecting this game--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Have a cookie. The unbusinesslikeman of business 02:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I love cookies. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 02:43, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Cookies or brownies? The unbusinesslikeman of business 02:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Which is better. The unbusinesslikeman of business 02:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
(Edit conflict x3) It'll have to be vegan--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
That's no fun. Can't have brownies and cookies without baking with butter and shortening. The unbusinesslikeman of business 02:50, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
You can, and they're just as good as the ones with bovine lactate squeezed out of mastitic udders and loaded with hormones and antibiotics.--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

17 emails so far. Keep up the good work--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Cough. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 02:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
62 it says. Not bad.--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Really?[edit]

Everytime you get an email? Pimobile (talk) 02:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Really really.--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Are you sure brx? Aceace 02:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Having contempt for you as a person makes it easy to inconvenience you. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
(Edit conflict x2) I'm positive. Everything that happens on my user page that isn't done by me means I get an email. Changes in the deletion log, moves, minor edits, all of it.--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
What about bot edits?— Unsigned, by: PeterL / talk / contribs
I'm pretty sure that bot edits count too, but I don't think blue's signbot is active--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

How fascinating. Pimobile (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Are you absolutely sure it is every time? Pimobile (talk) 02:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
As scientists we should do a controlled experiment.Pimobile (talk) 03:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
In a minute I will leave a message for you tell me if you recieve an email. Pimobile (talk) 03:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Test. Pimobile (talk) 03:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Have some empirical evidence: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:Goodforyou.jpg--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) Go into the deletion log and look for pictures I've uploaded. Two of them are in fact of my email inbox being filled with notification emails--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Jesus christ.[edit]

My preferences --> scroll down to "E-mail options" ---> " E-mail me when my user talk page is changed". Uncheck. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 02:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I know that. But I like to be notified by email. It only gets annoying when I do or say something someone doesn't like and everybody storms my talk page or when this pet peeve of mine hits the spotlight and everybody with time to kill storms my talk page with thousands of redundant minor edits. I think I'm doing quite well considering you're all making a concerted effort to piss me off. So long as you don't make a bot...--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Quick someone make a bot. Aceace 03:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

martyr or victim[edit]

What's the value you get out of saying "everyone is so mean to me", and over reacting to everything? I've never seen anyone so willing to blame others for things he or she can easily change, then whine when no one give into his or her tantrums.--Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 03:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Usually it's not just about me but about others, namely Maratrean and other harmless people with dissenting opinions. And again, I should not have to change if I am not the one doing anything wrong.--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
You don't have a dissenting opinion. You're a grievance collecting troll. There's a difference. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 03:36, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
No. You are someone who is unwilling to give up on having his own cyber playground where he gets to pretend he's cool and can vent his frustrations by trolling people--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Brx, you really are a moron if that's how you'd describe me. There are exactly 2 people I've had the kind of trouble with in the last year - you and Maratrean. I was as vocal about Maratrean early on as people grew to be over the summer. You started this shit with me by continually attacking me whenever you could. That doesn't sound much like you're describing things, yet that's the way it is. Prior to you and Maratrean my record is pretty clean. You keep repeating this kind of shit and it makes no sense. If anyone's using this place as a playground it's the person who's goal from the start has been to get attention however he can. That's you. From the concern trolling to the grievance collecting to the lies about users who are vocal in letting you know you're unwelcome. I really cannot for the life of me understand how you can carry on with literally nobody in your corner when you pull your histrionics. And then I remind myself that every few weeks you get worked up to the point of having to create some kind of shit storm so you can once again get the attention you crave. You are pathetic and your continual shit has really made RW an unattractive place to commune with friends and work on the project. I wish you'd fuck off. Will you fuck off, Brx? Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 03:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
And you're giving him the attention, you fucking morons. -- Nx / talk 07:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
But that's teh thing, Brx. I tried to say this before: no one can make you do anything. YOu chose in life, how you will react to life, to others, to troubles. You answer is teh 5 year old "he's mean to me", rather than the more grown up "rolling eyes and moving on" type reaction. You say you are defending mara, but you aren't. They don't need you to defend them, cause they don't get bothered by this game playing. they get that it's game playing and choose to play. You are what you choose to be. but what you've chosen to be is ...well... sad. --Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 03:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC) )edoit con)
And how about freaking the fuck out because i swore at you, trolling across this site and RWW and cooping me - all because I asked what the fuck? Aceace 03:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Fuck is a very scary word, Ace. Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 03:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) I disagree. Maratrean does not enjoy getting asses and penises constantly posted on his talk page, and he does not think it is fun to get his rights removed and get blocked for three months even though he hadn't broken a single rule (at the time- there was that whole thing where he tried keeping MC's posts on his talk page despite a community vote on the matter). This wiki is not here for that. We can refute pseudoscience without acting like shitheads.
@Ace-that was based on our ...history together. You blocked me, I was pissed, and I asked why the fuck you still have block rights--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I asked what the fuck you were talking about - that is all. I swear like that all the time yet you are the only one who wets their pants. Your a troll, a drama queen. Grown the fuck up. Aceace 03:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
No, no, no. That's not what happened. You did in fact ask me that, and I responded without any drama. You then persisted, I called you out, and you blocked me. Being blocked, I was unable to confront you here so I did so on RWW--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:51, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Brx, my point is Mara has never asked for your help. he has either 1) dealt with teh situation directly, or brought it up himself in teh coop. you try to bring him into your little victim land, and that doesn't win you points with anyone. And for the record, I'm of the mind that YOU started tonights little game with Ace. you jumped into a conversation not regarding you, and got upset. huh???Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 03:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh so this offended you so badly? Troll. Aceace 03:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  1. I made a joke at my own expense.
  2. Ace didn't get it rudely asked what I was talking about.
  3. UHM flamed Ace and I edit conflicted with him my explanation of the joke that did not contain any flaming.
  4. Ace asked what was wrong with us, and I, inspired by UHM, said there was nothing wrong with us, just that he's a jerk
  5. Ace blocks me
  6. Here begins the drama
Maratrean may never have asked for my help but I'm sure that if you ask him he won't be of the same opinion as you. Actually, he agrees with me that the wiki should generally be more civil and that people such as Ace and Nutty are making the wiki worse by being here and doing what they do. There are people here (who I like to refer to as the circle jerk) who delight in trolling others, and they justify themselves on flimsy pretenses such as their being cranks (in Mara's case), their not meeting whatever social standards they think one should meet (in Ty's case), and their trying to get people to stop flinging shit at each other (in Blue's case). I would like these people to reform or leave, that the wiki may refute and discuss pseudoscience in peace--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
why exactly should you have a "right" to tell people to reform or leave. People who are adults deal with teh fact that they dislike how others act. That you think you have a right to tell fuck all about how we should behave? Really? What do you get out of being here. you do not really edit, you do sometimes talk at the CP rooms, but really, why RW? clearly, we aren't up to your civility standards, so why are you here?--Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 04:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I am at RW because I enjoy skepticism. I always have. And as to your claims that I don't edit, are you fucking simple? I edit. I edit mainspace. I have made articles. You may not like my edits, but I've made them, they're mine, and I've made quite a few of them. This is my most recent substantial mainspace contribution--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Your history with Ace and everyone else you've targeted is that you rolled up in here with an eye toward antagonizing people you viewed as ripe for trolling for whatever reason. I wonder who else is getting tired of hearing you tell us all what RationalWiki is for and how it's done when you contribute nothing of value and cause more trouble that you're worth. Is your head really so thick that you can't detect when you're reviled? Or do you not care that the people who use this site the most hold you in contempt? What the fuck is wrong with you? You keep talking about community this and community that when you're about as much a part of the community as fleas are part of a dog. I guarantee you that you that everyone you've started a beef with here is going to enjoy RW long after you're gone. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 04:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
It's a nice spin you've put on, that every time I complain about someone being an asshole I'm trolling--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Who are you complaining about? People you've openly antagonized. I never asked for a beef with you. You began coming after me before I even knew who the fuck you were. I don't know why you targeted me and Ace but it's pretty obvious that's what happened as soon as you jumped headlong in to helping whip things into a frenzy in May. And yeah, you're the very definition of an internet troll. And when you deceitfully misrepresent your history of attention whoring and the reason some of us detest you, you're trolling. That's how it is. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 04:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh no. I came after you once i saw that you had attacked Ty. That's why. I didn't even know who you were, except that you were an asshole (I said dick at the time, but lately I've been trying to use gender-neutral insults)--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
So you stuck your nose into something that was none of your business and decided to keep up and escalate a beef that you started all on your own. I don't believe that for a second. My "attack" on Tyranus was between me and him, yet you've been using that as an excuse to act like a bitch for 6 months. Nice spin, bitch. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 04:25, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
That was the reason I started to dislike you. You've behaved similarly since quite a bit, hence my continuing disapproval. You bullied Ty. I like Ty, and it pissed me off. I called you out and vandalized your user page (which I won't do again). From then on I saw you as the troll and bully you are, and continued to call you out for your behavior.--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I've behaved similarly to whom? You and Maratrean. Nobody gives a fuck what you disapprove of and you're hardly in any position to call anyone here out on shit. I've barely edited this place in months yet you continue raising my name to lie about me. You'll figure this stuff out someday. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 04:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

More like this brx:

  1. brx makes a joke at his own expense.
  2. I asked what the fuck you were talking about.
  3. UHM flamed me and brx edit conflicted with him with explanation of the joke that did not contain any flaming.
  4. I asked what was wrong with you
  5. brx and UHM act like chumps and trolls
  6. I decide i can play too and block brx.
  7. Brx moans and smears shit over two wikis.

Aceace 04:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Doesn't seem very different than my narrative. You didn't have a very good reason to block me--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey man, you wanted to play the game...Aceace 04:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
What game? I was pissed at you for always being a crapsack. That's not a game.--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
You must be mentally retarded if you think you're going to win whatever game you're playing with Ace. You're not going to "reform" him and you're not going to drive him to leave. He's smarter, better looking, better educated, more interesting, and better liked than you'll ever be. God I just can't understand how you could persist in this delusion that you're somehow part of some kind of sea change in the ethos of an established community that reviles you. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 04:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


PROTIP[edit]

If you want to refute pseudoscience and stuff, don't get involved in the drama and stick to that. -- Nx / talk 07:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Archives[edit]

You are supposed to cut page text & paste it into a new archive page; not move the talk page to the archive location. A talk page's complete history should be in its "fossil record", not the fossil records of a bunch of different archives. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:52, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

It's one of the possible methods, although not how we usually do archives around here. It's his talk page, if he wishes to do it this way, let him. -- Nx / talk 19:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Yup--User:Brxbrx/sig 19:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Personally, I don't even like archiving. I'm hoping to delete my archives in the middle of the night some time so no one notices. Or make 1000 fake archives, so the real archive is hidden somewhere. or rename my archive "really boring shit no oen wants to look at.". I'm a fan of hiding my mistakes from the world.  ;-) Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 20:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

How does it feel?[edit]

To know that wherever you go on this wiki, you leave a trail of shit and bad feelings? To know that every time you hit the "save" button, there's a better than average chance that somebody is going to be pissed off at you? I assume it feels GREAT, because you seem to enjoy the hell out of it. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 21:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Funny, I thought you knew the answer to that question. --ʤɱ sinner 21:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) It's more like this: whenever someone like you flings shit at somebody, I pop up and say "WTF?"! Then the someone like you gets all bitter and pissed that he's being called on his abuse and he flings more shit.--User:Brxbrx/sig 21:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Interesting. you can say "what the fuck", but if ace says it to you, he's offending you. Gotcha. --Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 21:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
*sigh* I was not offended because Ace said "what the fuck." I was offended because Ace has a history of acting like a worn out catheter bag--User:Brxbrx/sig 21:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm sure this'll help, Bricks. SJ Debaser 12:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Allright, I'm calling it.[edit]

We've officially reached the point were anything you do is wrong. Simply by definition. --ʤɱ netlabelist 23:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm thinking I should start siding with the circle jerk, that way everything will go the way we want it to. --User:Brxbrx/sig 00:10, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
"argumentum ex brxbre" Blue Talk 00:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

You realize[edit]

you're not winning right?--il'Dictator Mikalosa (talk) 00:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

winning what, exactly?--User:Brxbrx/sig 00:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Anybody's respect, for one thing. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 00:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Anybody minus UHM. --ʤɱ soviet 00:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) I don't know, I thought he was the hot favourite for Biggest n00b this year. - π Moderator 00:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Everyone knows SuperJosh is and always be the n00b of the year. Aboriginal Noise Punkrock 01:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Agreed, SuperJosh wins in perpetuity. Aceace 01:10, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Was there a cheque or something? --ʤɱ kant 00:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 07:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

CONGRATULATIONS![edit]

You have become, after MC, only the second user in more than four years to have a template that community member can use to express their dissatisfaction with your conduct on the website. Well done, sir. Well done. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 00:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

It's mostly jocular - I don't "hate" Brx. I just wish he'd stop causing so much trouble. If it's intentional trolling, then stop. If it's not intentional trolling, then learn.--ADtalkModerator 00:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Balloons.svg steriletalk 00:43, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
PARTY TIME!!!!

Try this...[edit]

You'll thank me in the morning....Aceace 12:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

It is the morning here in Arizona, and I can't watch it from the US. At least I tried watching this one. Usually I ignore them.--User:Brxbrx/sig 12:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
If you are going to have morning song, this should be it...listen. Tolerate.

Aceace 12:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Fix this[edit]

Good luck. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 22:53, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

You mean a link from my user page isn't enough? I thought everybody read my user page!--User:Brxbrx/sig 22:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

"Shut up, Brx."

Br[edit]

Seriously, don't be a prick, because you dont come off any better then the people you bitch and moan about doing evil vile things--il'Dictator Mikalosa (talk) 23:29, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring.[edit]

If you won't accept sysopship and thus make yourself unblockable, you can't edit war. Straight up. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 23:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

^ --il'Dictator Mikalosa (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm blockable. You just need a good reason. Edit warring is a good reason.--User:Brxbrx/sig 23:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
I find it amazing that anyone could see you as anything other than a noxious troll and horrible cunt. Aceace 23:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
It really is amazing how you folks made it that everybody is pissed about brx through simply saying it over and over and over and over and over again. It's like we got our very own Fox News. --ʤɱ secularist 00:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Anyone besides who? Maratrean, UHM and Nx? B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 23:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
I do't! I just find him annoying and hold him personally accountable for all problems he might be involved in FOR because an annoying dick--il'Dictator Mikalosa (talk) 23:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
There's a ringing endorsement. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 00:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Holmes[edit]

[1] You're totally wrong, but I'm not going to bother arguing with a little tit like you.}Scream!! (talk) 23:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

So let me get this straight[edit]

Someone divulged Nx's name and you think they should be banned for three years but you outed my work IP and spent ages arguing with me about it. Aceace 00:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Wait, what? They have internet at the rehab clinic now? Awesome! B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 00:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Ace, Bricks didn't out your work IP. You did. -- Nx / talk 00:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
I initially posted it agreed but I over-sighted it straight away and Brx outed it several times over. Aceace 00:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
And I apologized for my actions. For a minute you seemed to have accepted my apology, but apparently dredging it back up is too sweet.--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Links to ED[edit]

Really, really unnecessary. Aceace 22:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

You're correct. I even nominated the ED template for deletion.--User:Brxbrx/sig 01:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Man, you don't have a cooperative bone in your body, do you?--User:Brxbrx/sig 01:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

CPR[edit]

I have restored your article. Now go work on it and leave the rest of us alone
B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 14:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

You[edit]

You owe Godot a GIANT FUCKING THANK-YOU for fixing up your little articles. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 19:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

"MCwiki business"[edit]

Could you please conduct "business" related to a project dedicated to comparing members of this project to bloodthirsty dictators and the over-use of profoundly sexist terminology as a way to talk about many of us somewhere other than on pages paid for/maintained by/communally owned by by members of this community? Thanks. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 03:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh relax, I was joking. My account there was in a similar spirit to yours. I was going to ask on RWW but that's down, and since Moshe's IP is blocked in MCwiki, I could only do so here, on Maratrean's talk page.--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Heya[edit]

Sysopship. I remember they tried to strip it from you but you decided to defuse the situation by resigning it. But I would suggest that the time has come for you to reconsider that decision. You have become, as much as some people might dislike you, an important part of this community, and I think you deserve sysopship. So, the decision is ultimately up to you, but if you want sysopship, I would be happy to give it to you (I have the technical ability to do so, and I believe that doing so would be compliant with the rules of this site.)

BTW, about MCWiki. I kind of get the impression that you and MC don't get along. Don't think my participation in that site is about taking sides with MC against people he doesn't like. A lot of people MC doesn't like, I like, and a lot of people who don't like MC, I like (I guess in most cases the feelings of dislike are mutual). MC tends to go in a bit too much for invective, and I suppose I can see both invective's positive and negative aspects, but for the sake of brevity I shall speak no more of that. I actually hope that maybe MC and others with whom he does not now get along could find a way to get along in the future (I don't want to assign blame, since I really don't claim to understand how the situations came to be as they are to begin with). As one of the Ausländer of this site, I really would hope that all the Ausländer would stick together, and it pains me somewhat when that is not the case. (((Zack Martin))) 10:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Brx is not an important member of the community. He is a much loathed and maligned member much like yourself Maratrean. Aceace 20:21, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Yo Bricks[edit]

I just voted for you in every single cateogry you were nominetaed for apart from best cook which ofcoures went to my man Crundy. i abstained voting from teh categories which hyou'd been removed from beacuse if i had my way you'd win every fucking reward available and i htink if if you can't have them (ie most decidated, mosteffective mod least effectivemod most missed least msisted ) then no one can. Good luck buddy we're all rooting ofryou! SJ Debaser 22:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

So here's a question for you[edit]

Two users are having a dispute. A third user, known to be something of a flashpoint himself, notices this dispute, which has nothing to do with him. The best thing for him to do is:

  • A. nothing.
  • B. get involved.

PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 22:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I guess it depends what I think the result would be, and the moral implications of just sitting there.--User:Brxbrx/sig 23:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Nothing about an online exchange has any "moral implications," unless a user is using the site to threaten the well-being of IRL people. What possible result could you foresee coming out of sticking your nose into an Ace/Nx fight? would it make Ace happy? Does Nx need your help somehow? would your time not be better served reading a book, or doing the dishes, or something? PintOfStout Talk Good people drink good beer. 23:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I disagree. One's words and actions online can have impacts on one's emotions. They often do, in fact. And in this case Ace was in the wrong and I outlined why I thought that was so (as well as giving him the same treatment he and others so often give me) But you're right, I do need to do my dishes. --User:Brxbrx/sig 23:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Three users are having a dispute. A fourth user notices this dispute, which has nothing to do with him. The best thing for him to do is:
  • A. nothing
  • B. take it to on of their talk pages
Oh look, I should make this into a template. Tielec01 (talk) 23:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Bricks suffers from a crippling condition called "Third Wheel Syndrome." It causes him to inject himself wherever he's least wanted. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 23:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Stop it[edit]

Please stop changing the subsection name on RW:ATOM from "Summary" to "Playpen". It might be funny to you but it's dickish and cuntish (yay pc!). If you coninue and Nutty blocks you I won't unblock you - even if the length is over the top. --ʤɱ libertarian 23:23, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I've accepted my sysop rights, so I'm not afraid of being blocked. But seriously, they do the same shit to me. Nutty, P-Foster, Ace, they always pull that shit. --User:Brxbrx/sig 00:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
You will find a great many privileges opened up to you, when people don't think you're an annoying shit. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey, let's everybody get on the bandwagon and hate on brxbrx, regardless of whether we know anything about him or not!--User:Brxbrx/sig 00:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
And if you knew anything about me, you'd know I don't jump on bandwagons—I make my own wagon and desperately try to force it on the site. Furthermore, whether I know anything about you or not is irrelevant, when every time I see you you're being a goddamn irritant. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Who does what to you? I avoid you like the plague because of your persistent habit of bringing me up out of the blue to attack and lie about me, as you've done twice today. This nonsense has been going on for more than 6 months and it's been tedious for just as long. Just knock off the gratuitous shots at your ideological enemies and leave us alone already. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 00:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Fun blocks should require consent.[edit]

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Hastur!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Aceace 21:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Yo Bricks my man[edit]

You are like da bomb! You are da answer to every question! Stop trying to fight da fame man, embrace it and claim as ya own. You are da Long-eared Jerbobrxbrx. GO BRXBRXBRXBRXBRXBRXBRX! Da Jews of Cordova thank you. So do da mudkips. All your base belong to Brxbrx.— Unsigned, by: 58.165.53.100 / talk / contribs

A thought[edit]

Generally one does not stay in places where one is informed, repeatedly, that they are not welcome. I advise you to leave. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 15:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

To put it more bluntly, scram. Leave. Fuck off. Skedaddle. Make like a tree. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 16:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Make like a tree?--Dumpling (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
[2] ArchieGoodwin (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Interesting. I'd never thought about that phrase. Anyways... I see you left me a few hostile messages in a thread or two. I think you need to chill out and back off.--User:Brxbrx/sig 17:39, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hey! Archie! I'd like him to stay. --ʤɱ soviet 18:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Are you so daft that you are censoring a hand gesture in the name of "civility"? ArchieGoodwin (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
No, I just didn't want to put the picture on here. I like linking to pictures more that putting them on pages, also the comedic effect is better IMHO. Don't ask me why, I also like cookies more than cake. Or are you so daft to assume brx changed it? --ʤɱ kant 20:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
No, I can read page histories. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 03:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
A skill that Brxbrx sadly lacks. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Not to mention social skills. Aceace 03:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
And fight-or-flight and not to eat things off the side of the road. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 03:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

You don't seem very popular around here[edit]

Why do you think that is? Slam (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

I would tell you why I think that is, but I can't without coming off as incredibly delusional. Suffice to say, I've my opinions and my ways to share them.--User:Brxbrx/sig 20:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
I've my opinions and my ways to share them. Opinions which nobody cares about and ways to share them which nobody understands. Aceace 20:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
For somebody moaning about somebody else sharing their unwanted opinion you share your unwanted opinions quite a lot. --ʤɱ digital native 21:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
I see this piece of shit has attracted another fly. Aceace 21:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Some context to the above comment by Ace. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
What part do you not understand about cramming them into every possible conversation?  : ) Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Do you think you should change your approach to people, if that is the case? Might help, IMHO. Slam (talk) 20:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Oh and BTW I have sent you an email through the Rationalwiki "email this user" tool. Slam (talk) 21:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The jig is up![edit]

I'm moving the party here Blues-brothers-076.gifParty.gifParty animal.gif Lord of Reckless Noise Hooray! I'm helping! 14:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Prefential voting[edit]

You do realise, that as a preferential vote, someone could vote for you, and then their vote would not be wasted, since you'd be eliminated and it would flow to one of their subsequent preferences? Your reasoning seems to assume first-past-the-post, but that isn't the system here. (((Zack Martin))) 04:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

There are enough candidates so that all the slots could be filled with better choices than me. At least I think. Haven't done the math--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
The math involved: *glance at page* Yup, there sure are a lot of people that aren't fucktards who've been nominated.
Though, I assume Bricks' "math" is somehow more complex. Perhaps involving calculus. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:37, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I dropped out of high school two thirds of the way through trigonometry, and lately I've had little success with math, even failing a cashier's math test (the job was practically mine- but fucking subtraction foiled me!). And I meant people that aren't assholes, like Blue, DickTurpis, and others whose names I don't feel like recalling--User:Brxbrx/sig 04:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I knew man it, I fucking knew you'd put yourself on the ticket. You waited a few days to see if anyone would put you up but no one did so you had to do it yourself. But I could tell you were hanging for it. AceAce For Mod! 05:18, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I was completely wrong in the above post. I apologise unreservedly. AceAce For Mod! 11:08, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I thought so... but I was a bit confused about whether you were addressing Brxbrx or myself, so I didn't say anything. (((Zack Martin))) 11:09, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Vote Ace for no more internet bills[edit]

Ace for mod Winter 2011 800x122.jpg AceAce For Mod! 03:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

If you're offering to pay the monthly 50 USD that is my cable bill so that I'll vote for you, I just might take you up on that offer. Maybe you can put some money in escrow or however these things work.--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
no, because with Ace you'll no longer be allowed access to the internet. No internet - no bills. Ace[[User Talk:Ace McWicked|Ace For Mod!] 03:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Ah. No thanks--User:Brxbrx/sig 03:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
You certainly are generous, Ace. My platform was much more violent, and involved him being struck by lightning. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 04:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
The above certainly demostrates typical liberal censorship of dissent and is further proof of Stabby's liberal deciet. Conservative Punk (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey, uh... Brx.[edit]

What's happening? I just wanted to ask something but I forgot what it was... SJ Debaser 12:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh wait, I just remembered. SJ Debaser 12:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Do you still get an email every time someone makes an edit to this page? SJ Debaser 12:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes. Is it still funny for you?--User:Brxbrx/sig 14:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
No, I was just curious. SJ Debaser 14:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
I saw all the posts above this and was merely wondering if you'd got it sorted. SJ Debaser 14:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Enjoying the festive season so far? SJ Debaser 14:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
For your information, it's not even close to the 4th of July yet.. Conservative Punk (talk) 14:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Or were you talking about CHRISTmas? Because Brxbrx is a main part of the War on Christmas. Conservative Punk (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Beecawse Yew is a Goff[edit]

Just for you...

--PsyGremlinSermā! 13:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

lol, well, I like wearing sandals, but I live in Arizona--User:Brxbrx/sig 15:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

FFS[edit]

It's allready public knowledge that you are the CP account in question. I'm pretty damn sure they know it too. The rule seems to be that you don't get blocked if you know when not to argument any longer. Sid for example made it several months until being blocked again and he really was a pain in their ass. You'll be just fine as long as you stay a coward over there. --ʤɱ pirate 18:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm unsure. DMorris knows, Rob knew, and Ken suspects, but throwing it their face would likely get me banned. I don't want to risk it. As for me being a coward, I'm trying to improve the site the only way you can without buying the domain name. It was unnecessary of you to say that I'm CamilleT, and I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't in the future.--User:Brxbrx/sig 18:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
I get that you have to be coward or a bully on CP to survive, that wasn't really an attack (although it sure sounded like one). I'll refrain from it in the future if you're so hung up on making a dumbster look better. --ʤɱ kant 18:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Was that a pun or a typo? Awesome either way--User:Brxbrx/sig 18:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Is it true you get an email everytime some posts to your talkpage?[edit]

Really CamilleT? Whoops I mean "brxbrx". AceAce For Mod! 19:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I believe that Brx does, but Camille doesn't. P-Foster 19:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Ahhh, I see. AceAce For Mod! 19:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Or it could be that Camille does, but Brx doesn't. I can never remember. P-Foster 19:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) That's correct. My email notification is only active for this account, and not for the CamilleT account. Now grow up. Seriously, don't you people have jobs?--User:Brxbrx/sig 19:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Aren't they the same person? Oh damnit! Slipped out again. AceAce For Mod! 19:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
I am on holiday Camille, I could do this all day if I didn't have to go to the dentist in a couple hours. AceAce For Mod! 19:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) Yes, my name is Camille, and my last name starts with a letter T. I have no problem with you discussing it on my talk page.