User talk:OncomingStorm

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, OncomingStorm! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Hi there OncomingStorm, welcome to RationalWiki. - User $\pi$ 18:27, 15 April 2009 (EDT)

What are you doing now Jinx? TK is going to ban you again. - User $\pi$ 06:21, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

You know that's not who I am. That I've just copied from his user page. You know that, I know that, TK knows that. OncomingStorm 07:49, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

You sound nervous, although you should seeing how close you came to being banhammered. - User $\pi$ 08:03, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

What tangible difference would it make if I was banned. Would it change anything? Temper the oncoming storm? I have to pay the price as much as anyone. OncomingStorm 08:19, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Whatever? - User $\pi$ 08:43, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Exactly. OncomingStorm 08:54, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Welcome!

Perhaps you can bring some rationality to Rationalwiki. Jimaginator 09:11, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

It is not my job. OncomingStorm 10:06, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

OK. Jimaginator 11:27, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

IT is more important to stem bigotry, than to enforce viewpoints. OncomingStorm 11:29, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Hello new editor who in no way reminds us of a certain quasi-sysop from CP who is the subject of a popular game and has been known to troll Amazon.com SirChuckB^{Please Excuse me, I have to go out and hunt giraffes} 13:24, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

It would be desirable if a few people from here maybe gave just a little consideration the the direction their lives are heading in. OncomingStorm 13:50, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Could you Explain yourself more Fully? Thank you.--Tolerance 14:21, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

It has already been explained in a book. OncomingStorm 14:26, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Thanks for the advice, Jinx _{hi Jinx!}. What do you do when you need to give a little consideration to the direction your life is taking you? I do vipassana meditation every morning I can for about an hour. That seems to get my mind focused for the day so I can do good work that I enjoy and that's consistent with my life goals. You'd be amazed at how clear things get when you're at least on the road to moving past all the silly biases and heuristics your parents teach you. I'm glad my parents more taught me "how" to think than taugh me "what" to think, but still I have to overcome roadblocks to truly being me, rather than parroting what other people mouth over and over because of their own silly biases and fear of new ideas. I'm glad you've managed to be your own person. How do you manage to stay so blissfully calm and focused? Do you do work that you enjoy and that sustains you intellectually aside from your massively effective efforts at debunking liberal fallacies on CP and elsewhere? I hope so. It can get lonely out there when you're being so vigilant. What book were you referring to? I just finished God Is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens and really enjoyed it. I'll reserve you a copy at the local B&N if you want. Keep up the good work. You're aces in my book. Your friend, Thee Nuttish ^Talk 14:28, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

I've already said I'm not Jinx. I've just copied parts from his userpage. OncomingStorm 14:34, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

OncomingStorm - you speak of the one Good Book which we should all follow? Of course I Agree. I was just Wondering if you would care to make your Personal Opinion a bit more Explicit? But If you would Prefer to refer us to the Word of God then I am Sure that would be Fine as well. Yours in Christ.--Tolerance 14:32, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

I think you know my position already. OncomingStorm 14:34, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

I'm sorry but I have No Idea. But if you do not wish to Divulge it then I am not one to Insist.--Tolerance 14:36, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

I want to know more about you NotJinx. You're very interesting. Thee Nuttish ^Talk 14:40, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

I'm not the important one here. OncomingStorm 14:43, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

I must say this is all rather odd. Obviously a user has no obligation to say anything about themselves, but all this innuendo and obscurantism is a bit weird. I would suggest that if the user has something to say then they should simply come out and say it.--Bob^{bing up} 04:35, 24 April 2009 (EDT)--Bob^{bing up} 04:35, 24 April 2009 (EDT)

(unindent) I know I'm super-late to this, but man, this sounds like somebody/thing trying to pass the Turing Test. 173.10.105.29 17:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

So, what storm?

Is this the Big Gay Storm that the folks at NOM are so worried about, the economic shitstorm currently in the works, the alien invasion the folks in City of Heroes are anticipating, or what? --Gulik 15:47, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Are you being outrageous? OncomingStorm 15:59, 23 April 2009 (EDT)

Lets get you out of those wet clothes --Opcn 17:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Greetings

Can you explain what you meant here in which you said you wouldn't be contributing here for obvious reasons? I'm intrigued. Matt 08:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Well obvious reasons are by definition obvious Matt are they not? OncomingStorm 21:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like TK when he said something to the effect that things that are obvious don't need evidence. Neveruse513 21:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Well that's true. And reasons that aren't clear are, by definition, not obvious. So what are the reasons? Matt 23:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Seriously - Here's what's obvious: Someone writes a lot of shit and gets reverted, this site thinks there's something strange about that. OncomingStorm 22:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Cooperation

Asking if help is needed on a Wiki is how a Wiki is built. Seriously! When will you lot realize that everything you put down is what produces the 'lifestyles' you idiots live in! OncomingStorm 21:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} Did you have a point? Or are you just mumbling to yourself hoping for some spare change? SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 21:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I find it cathartic. What's your excuse for mumbling to me? OncomingStorm 21:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Not mumbling Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} just asking a question. SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 21:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

So you think I'm actually adding text to this page in search of small change? OncomingStorm 21:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I was merely saying that it's rather strange to be posting new threads on your own talk page... If you have a message, put it on your User page and then it doesn't seem like you're talking to yourself. SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 21:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. OncomingStorm 21:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I didn't realise Andy Schlafly and a few other weirdos were responsible for my lifestyle. Thanks for the heads up.Matt 23:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

So whats your deal

Hello, we have yet to be introduced. My name is Ace McWicked. I have watched your edits with interest and I am wondering what your deal is? Are you Jinx, just an asshole or what? Ace McWicked^{The Liquid Room} 21:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not Jinx, hopefully not an 'asshole'. And if I am an 'asshole' then being here makes me feel alot better OncomingStorm 21:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I see. Ace McWicked^{The Liquid Room} 21:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey Buddy

Just so you know, Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} Your user page is your castle and nobody will mess with it. However, your user talk page is not your castle and anyone can add whatever they want to no matter how annoying you find it. If you feel someone is abusing authority, you are welcome to take them to Administrative Abuse if you like. SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 22:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure there's little chance of authority abuse here. Thanks for your kind words. OncomingStorm 23:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Do I know you?

I think I remember you. You were the guy that could make it drizzle pink raindrops, right? Yeah, yeah, you teamed up with Ultragay and knocked over that florist shop in Greenwich Village. I remembered it because the local news interrupted the Golden Girls to cover you two knuckleheads. You were screaming at the top of your lungs for the Fantastic Four or the Avengers to come and thwart your diabolical flora crime wave. Yeah, right! You two aren't even D-listers. Especially you, at least Ultragay has that... thing he does. For crying-out-loud that little girl came over and kicked you in the shin. And your costume, the one that looks like a gay hood-ornament, really needs a redesign.

-- Deadpool Hey, everybody, look! I won! I won!

Could you maybe make the bits you think are funny bold text please. Are you using the term 'gay' in a derogetory way here? OncomingStorm 19:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

What? You're the one that totally ripped off Chronic's costume. Chaka Luther King thought it looked like a gay hood-ornament, and so do I. You really should be more worried about that pink-raindrops-as-superpower-thing. Honestly, a little girl kicked you in the shin and you started crying like a bitch. Just think if Bea Arthur had been there. That would have been the last florist shop you ever knocked over.

-- Deadpool Oh, Bea Arthur, how could you leave me?!

This is obviously hilarious if you read comic books. I don't - so fuck off! OncomingStorm 18:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Aw, did your feelwings get hurt you penis-obsessed white-supremacist? Get back to me when your phoney-baloney god gives you the ability to do anything more than be a wikibully. --Edgerunner⁷⁶_{...and a hotplate!} 23:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

'Phoney-baloney god'; why don't you retract that statement for your own sake, it really doesn't bother me. OncomingStorm 23:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Can I get in on the shit talking? ^{— Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs} 23:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Neveruse513, I admit there are people on this liberal shit-pile that can at least sound intelligent in their arguments; I think the majority of people on RW would agree that you aren't one of them. OncomingStorm 23:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Yay! ^{— Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs} 23:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I follow a truth that means I can't always do what the hell I want; you deny the truth so you can behave in whatever damaging way you desire - I guess you've got it easy...for now. OncomingStorm 23:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Looks like someone is talking out of their penis-bone stuffed bum again. Ace McWicked^{Disco Jesus} 23:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Assuming you're correct, which you're not, I won't let you fuck me in hell. User:Nutty Roux/sigtalk 23:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Psst... Hey Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} if you're trying to prove that are not our Aztec friend Jason from CP, you should avoid using his very very very obvious style when you sock... It's kinda like Ken. As soon as he says Gentlemen, he gives himself away... When every other post is either profane or an insult, your Jinx _{hi Jinx!} image shows through your Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} facade SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 02:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I did pray for you this evening. OncomingStorm 23:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Quiet night on CP, Terry? Генгис^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 00:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Prayer requests

I have a painful case of gas from eating a shitload of tacos at La Pasadita on Ashland. They're good going down. Not so good once there. Pray for me I'm wicked? Is there anything I can do for you? User:Nutty Roux/sigtalk 00:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

So early in the morning and already another liberal tries as hard as possible to prove my law. OncomingStorm 11:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

So have you just given up the Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} facade now? If so, can we start calling you Jason? SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 11:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Let me be absolutely clear about this Sir Chuck - I am not Jinx. OncomingStorm 11:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

You just speak in his style and make thinly disguised references to "my law." I'm sure that has nothing to do with this pile of crap Jinx _{hi Jinx!} left on our site before going to troll Amazon and masterbate over Miss California. That fact that it was right after a so called Liberal posted something mocking religion that you started mentioning this "law" is just a strange coincidence right? Ok Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} It's a slow day, so we can all play along.... SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 12:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

You have me curious now. What exactly is this "law" of yours? Or are you just really afraid that TK is going to ban you again? --PsyGremlin_Whut? 12:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

How can the liberal TK ban me from here? OncomingStorm 12:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

calling TK a "liberal" out of nowhere? Poe much? Totnesmartin 12:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Transistor

I do hope you haven't forgotten to enlighten us on just why "transistor" is conservative and why we are beyond hope for thinking Andy is either insane or clutching at straws for doing so. --PsyGremlin_Whut? 10:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Shit Shock and blog

Why didn't you approve my comment on your little blog Jinx? There was no swearing nor abuse. It was a well reasoned comment. Is it because I was right? Ace^McWicked 22:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

How very lyrical. OncomingStorm 22:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, quite. Now why didn't you approve it? I was correct that there was no double standard in your post so why didn't you address it? Ace^McWicked 23:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

That would mean Jinx would have to develop the balls to participate in a fair and intellectually honest debate. It is much easier for an intellectual midget, such as our friend here, to simply call you a penis-bone stuffed butt and banhammer you (after I explained to him how to do it of course). - π 23:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I still really want to know. Jinx says -
"The liberals have double standards because they didn't protest all the liberal bibles but now they protest the conservative bible!"
To which Ace suggested there was no double standard because the conservatives protested the liberal bible but do not protest the conservative one.
So where is the double standard jix and why did you not approve the post? Ace^McWicked 23:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Forget it, you and I have both challenged him to a debate, so he's scuttled off to hide behind his banhammer over there. --PsygremlinRunāt! 23:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Jinx, show yourself to have some sort of intellectual spine. This is a simple question, no agression or mockey (aside from my section title admittedly), and surely if you stand by your beliefs and actions you can justify it. So where is the double standard and why did you not approve my comment? Ace^McWicked 00:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

You know it is worth noting that every RationalWikian that runs a blog has open commenting. Seems like Jinx and his conservative ilk are a little afraid of open criticism to their ideas, unlike us more rational people. - π 00:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Jinx, you are now showing yourself to have as much intellectual rigour as Ken Demyer who also fails to answer simple questions and runs away, declaring himself the winner. Are you really that devoid of spine? Ace^McWicked 00:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Surely that's going just a little too far. OncomingStorm 20:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Errrr what? Ace^McWicked 20:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

JINX!!!!

If I were a foul-mouthed heathen, I'd lay into you so hard it would make your eyes melt, you Spawn of Satan! SoldierInGodsArmy 04:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} Glad to have you back. Really missed you around here.... First and foremost, let me wish you the best health wise. I hope you and your family get well quickly and move past this, I'm getting over a bit of sickness myself. Throat infection, with a cold piggy-backing on top of that, but not nearly as nasty as you guys picked up. In other words, you'll be happy to know that I'm petitioned the Jinx Baiting Cancel for use of the emergency back up Jinx for international competition till your health improves. Rest up buddy, rest up. SirChuckB^{One of those deceitful Liberals Schlafly warned you about} 06:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Well this does certainly appear to be a sensible precaution. OncomingStorm 20:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Please answer my question

Don't hide Jinx. If you are so much smarter than us liberals (of which I am not one) then please show your intellectual muscle, not to mention manhood, and answer my question -
"The liberals have double standards because they didn't protest all the liberal bibles but now they protest the conservative bible!"
To which I suggested there was no double standard because the conservatives protested the liberal bible but do not protest the conservative one.
So where is the double standard jix and why did you not approve the post? Ace^McWicked 06:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm not Jinx and thus have had nothing to do with this non-approval of your non-liberal comment. OncomingStorm 20:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Bullshit. Ace^McWicked 20:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Someone abuse checkuser and get it over with...wait..that wouldn't be nearly as fun. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block} 20:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Feel free. I keep reiterating that I'm not Jinx. I'm not sure what more I can do. OncomingStorm 20:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, just in case you're not Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!}, here's a story you might want to pass on to Brother Leader - he hasn't seen it yet and is probably long overdue an orgasm. --PsygremlinSpeak! 20:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Not Jinx, eh?

The fact that you say you aren't Jinx and that everyone else seems to think you are makes me think almost certainly that you definitely are the man himself. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and judge you from whatever edits you make here, substantive or unsubstantive. In the case that this is Jinx, all the best with your illness. SJ ^Debaser 21:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Not Jinx!

Are you going to start not blogging again soon? - π 22:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

There are many ways to get your message heard. OncomingStorm (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

True, but your telepathic abilities seem to be lacking. - π 22:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Well I do have a slight twinge in my left ankle. OncomingStorm (talk) 22:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} you're back. It's nice to see you old friend. Glad to have you around again. Can't wait to hear more of your rambling, pesudo-intellectual drivel that you like to pretend means something and then refuse to explain when prompted. TWigo: CP was a great start. SirChuckB^{Obama/Biden? 2012} 04:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Well as long as I keep you entertained. OncomingStorm (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Well wishes

I wish you and your family well in your time of need. All the best, SJ ^Debaser 18:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I wish him the best too. But I am not him...really really not. OncomingStorm (talk) 18:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Ah. Well then this was a fruitless endeavour. SJ ^Debaser 19:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to go run around and around and around. OncomingStorm (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Dude, Crazy Coincidence

So Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!}, I browsing around CP and noticed the strangest thing..... After a prolonged period of absence, our old pal Jinx _{hi Jinx!} is back at CP. Damndest thing really.... You come back on March 22nd, and then Jinx goes back on March 23rd.... Crazy right? I know. Well, nice talking to you Not Jinx _{Hi NOT Jinx!} Have a great day. SirChuckB^{Further bulletins as events warrant} 05:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)