User talk:PolarBearInTheJungle/Archive8

What is your problem?

Why do you hate me so much? I'm an anti-Christian anti-American anti-Semitic neo nazi. Isn't that just what rationalwiki is? I know my edits terrify conservapedia jewbagels. Billybobcarterwashington 20:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

If you don't mind terribly, can I appropriate the word "jewbagels"? It has a nice ring to it. Kthnx bai Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 00:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)::Sure--but, like there's any other kind of bagels. mmmmmmmmmm. bagels. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Free Usable?

Would it be ok to upload a screencap of a SNES game that was never released in North America?--Thanatos 05:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Probably not. Why do we need it? ħuman 06:25, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

If I can ever defeat God, the image of YHVH fell could have multiple uses on the site. Nietzsche for example.--Thanatos 06:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: CP liberal hate speech articles posted on Craigslist

Does reading the AA portion of Craigslist mean that you're a denizen of the area? I ask only because I'm an ol' townie myself, not because I'm planning some creepy TK-style stalking...--WJThomas 00:05, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

When people ask me where I live, I point to a spot on my right palm. Say no more. TheoryOfPractice 00:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

He's a 'Gander! ħuman 03:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

dimwittery

You should footnote that. Otherwise we won't believe you. ħuman 03:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Done. TheoryOfPractice 03:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Vandal Bin response posted on my talk page

Feel free to revert the parole if you want, but I'm a little more lenient on even extremely crass statements applied to public figures. ConservapediaEditor 03:57, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

The Penis Mightier

Was your penis mightier joke on MC's talkpage a reference to this classic piece of SNL humor? Just curious... Lord of the Goons ^{The official spikey-haired skeptical punk} 18:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Nope, from Mark Twain. TheoryOfPractice 19:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Blitzkrieg Bop

Toppy Top Top, I've captured your userpage briefly as it seems to be attracting the (most likely) random woman username vandal. Sorry for the intrusion, but it seemed like a good idea at the time. It expires in a day anyway... SJ ^Debaser 02:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Fucker

Just fuck off you prick.

Same old blarney, MC? You do have the gift of the gobshite. Генгис^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 20:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I have been denied a fair trial, branded a vandal, and become a pariah figure for having the honesty to point out your flaws to you. TOP is one of the RW mafia who are incapable of self criticism and who insist on silencing dissent at any cost. His compadre, the inherently flawed 'Theemperor', is the vehicle behind which this website is reaching its demise; Do you really think that after all the aggro both Goonie and that little shite caused that I'll just disappear? I'll simply move away from being a concern troll to being an angry troll until you either decide to ban me or decide to unbin me. You'd think you lot would learn that giving me a just grievance will give me infinitely aggrieved energy. So wise the fuck up, all of you. MarcusCicero (talk) 20:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Un-bin MarcusCicero or I am leaving for good. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block} 20:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't deal in threats or ultimatums, so G'bye! TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Sliders

It was a tv show. I added it because I thought it would give another touch of humor to the page.--Mustex (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

ah. no tv here. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I have sent you an e-mail

In response to the one you sent me. The Goonie 1 ^{What's this button do? Uh oh....} 01:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Terence Casey Brennan: met him?

Have you ever met T. Casey Brennan? As I live and breathe, he is a doppelganger of L. Ron Hubbard. He and I used to get baked and he would kick my ass all over the chess board when we lived in a housing co-op on Washtenaw Ave. Still a babe magnet after all these years, it seems. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 02:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I have not. But I'll keep my eyes open, as getting baked and getting my ass kicked at chess would definitely qualify as fun. UPDATE: Wait, I'm pretty sure I've seen him bumping around. Maybe @ the Ark? Anyway, just a glance at the article tells me I should search him out--I'm a huge comics guy, too. TheoryOfPractice (talk)

Not much into comics, me, but some of his stuff that I saw was worth a second look. That was then, and even at that time, one needed some tolerance of teh krazy to get along with im. He looked better in those days, and was often to be found on the carpet in a pile of people, all but him sporting bewbs. With application, he could have founded a bigger cult than he did. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 03:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Your rights

If/when you want them back, just e-mail me, and I'll restore them. Cheers. The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 14:37, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Going to miss your mop-work. --^{Ask me about your mother} 14:38, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

As am I. Everyone got mad at you for using your rights "above what is called for," but, in truth, the fact that you had a no nonsense aptitude for trolls was almost Robin Hood Esque, in that you'd go beyond the rules in order to preserve the rules and keep order here. Lord Goonie ^{Hooray! I'm helping!} 15:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I can agree in full for giving you your rights back if you'd like. Just let us know. Aboriginal Noise ^{Theist, barely hanging by a nail} 03:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I've given back your rights. Self-promotion is silly. Hope you come back soon. I reckon this latest round of nonsense is now winding down, & the wiki will be back to almost-normal soon enough. Wēāŝēīōīď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 13:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote of confidence. I'm assuming it's safe now...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Now look what you made me do!

(Block log); 23:54 . . Radioactive afikomen (Talk | contribs | block) blocked TheoryOfPractice (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 31 seconds (autoblock disabled) (I don't wear britches—I go commando.)

I can't shake the feeling that, a couple years from now, someone's going to go through your block log and see that one entry completely out of context. I've been immortalized for posterity as a man who doesn't wear underwear! : ( Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

You, sir, are a gentleman ...

and a fascist. Thanks for your help. MarcusTrolliusCicero (talk) 02:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

You sir...

...fail at following established Theemperor: Naming conventions, and capitalized a letter in my name after the first "T" in "The". Thus you have been banned from life by imperial proclimation of Grand President-for-life of Rationalwiki, His Highness, Pope Mullah Rabbi Exonerus I, Keeper of the Keys of RenameUser, Wielder of the great warhammer Hammer1, Posessor of the Amulet of Userrightsedit, Supreme High General of All Socks, Lord of Danes and Donuts, Banisher of All Creationists and Woo-Pushiers, and Conqueror of Rationalwikiwiki. In other new, did I tell you about the great sig i'm going to have? 24.13.203.96 (talk) 04:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

1. Sorry about the capitalization screw=up. Ruined a great moment. 2. Have you read Holmes's' The Autocrat at the Breakfast Table? it seems only appropriate. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 04:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Might as well not do half a job, Human.

Thanks for catching up on me. ħuman 04:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh I am so going to fuck you up.

^{— Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block} 16:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Wait...was that....HUMOR??? ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block} 16:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

HumoUr, more precisely. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Next time I'd like a little more time to feign outrage and ape due processes, please. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block} 16:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Now, now, girls. Play nice. ^pathetic 17:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Fat City

Do away with the land-rapers and greed-heads. We'll maintain a bicycle fleet, sod streets and punish dishonest drug dealers by placing them in stocks in front of city hall. Ace^{of Spades} 19:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Fuckin' A. FREAK POWER! TheoryOfPractice (talk) 19:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Fat City Uber Alles! Ace^{of Spades} 19:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Paper

Nice work man, its always a good feeling to get a paper finished. Ace^{of Spades}!

Ace, this one was like giving birth--on top of writing that fucker, I had to grade exams. I was going to do the paper Gonzo-style: shove my notes into a manila envelope and just give him the Pure, Unedited Data. Bad Craziness. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 05:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey, TOP, why are some people here so really pissed at you? What did I miss, other than the, um, refactoring of TWIGO CP ages go? Did you turn into a prick while was busy editing drunk or something? ħuman 05:25, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Who's pissed at me, Human? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

I dunno, probably Marcus and some other troll I forget who? If you didn't notice I'm done forgetting already :) ħuman 06:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, that's just Marcus being Marcus, innit? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Probably MC. Pay no attention. --User:Theautocrat/Sig 06:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Probably RA. Pay no attention. You'll just swell his head further. Anyways, I got a bastard of a paper finished last month and jesus it felt good to bury that fucker. Ace^{of Spades} 06:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

(EC^27) I dunno, I thought some other jackass was TOPping your name in vain. I was probably wrong. ħuman 20:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

The Christmas hat?

Why are you passionately against it? Do you not think its a bit of a silly thing to get worked up over? EdmundBurke (talk) 16:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not really a Christian, nor do I find pagan rituals relevant to my daily life. It's bad enough that that kind of iconography is ubiquitous in this culture. It would be nice to ahve one place in my life that didn't partake. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I quote me: "Can't one tiny corner of my life not be intruded upon by Xmas imagery all over the place?" Especially, the "rational" corner. I expect my local merchants to decorate and wish me happiness on the baby Capricorn's commemoration, but I don't expect that shit all over the Wiki the is persuaded to be Rational. ħuman 01:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Please accept with no obligation, implicit or explicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral celebration of the northern-hemisphere winter solstice/southern hemisphere summer solstice holiday, practised within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion or secular practices of your choice, with total respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, and their choice not to practise religious or secular traditions at all... and a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2010, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures, and without regard to the race, creed, colour, age, physical or mental ability, religious faith, sexual orientation and choice of computer platform of the wishee.
By accepting this greeting, you are accepting these terms. This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wishee actually to implement any of the wishes for her/himself or others, and is void where prohibited by law and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year, or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher. Генгис^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 17:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

As some whose goal in life is fiscal ruin, I find your greeting offensive. --^{Ask me about your mother} 19:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

I frankly find the greeting offensive as it is insufficiently inclusive. As some of you may remember, I am an alien from the planet Jupiter. No reference is made in the greeting to holidays which might or might not be celebrated by the many alien life forms who regularly visit Rational wiki. I trust that Mr Practice will reject it as a consequence of its implicit speciesism.--Skynet (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Ummm, thanks, I suppose--but it's just another day. Nothing more or less special than March 23rd or the 12th of September to me--I care not for religion, nor pagan festivals, nor do i think that the position of a planet relative to its sun is an event worthy of my recognition. No season, week, month or day is any more relevant tnan any other. So have a nice day, whatever day it is! TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I like it when the days start to get longer, finally. But I don't so much "celebrate" the "change" as muse upon the tilt of the earth's axis relative to the star it orbits... ħuman 01:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

ToP, you legend.

All the staff at McWicked Co. wish you a merry christmas.

From you, Ace, I'll accept any holiday greetings. Best to you and yours...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Mandolin

What kind of style do you play? Wēāŝēīōīď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 00:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Mostly jazz. How did you know I played? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 03:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

You mentioned it in your highlights of the last decade bit in that thread at Saloon Bar a few days ago. Jazz sounds complicated. I have a mandolin, but can only play very basic chords & very basic riffs. Wēāŝēīōīď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 15:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Got me curious. What does jazz mando sound like? I'm thinking Grappelli-esque, with lots of tremolo flutter picking. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Sprockett-not far off the mark--David Grisman has done some fantastic jazz playing on the mando--give him a listen for a sense of what the instrument can do....TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Trolls remorse

You know, I've been kinda harsh on you this last while. That wasn't cool. Sorry man. :(

newnew

MEMO Happy New Year, PolarBearInTheJungle. This is from Useful Mei. It is an appropriate time for festivities, like alcohol. Today try not to eat too much, or too little.

-- =w= 06:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Name Changing

A users name is theirs. Don't change a users name unless they ask you to. HatesNiggersAndFaggots (talk) 00:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

"Users can be renamed only if they request to have their name changed or if they have a patently offensive name."" TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm so glad to see there is no double standard. I guess the socks of long-time users are exempt from this policy. SayItLoudI'mBlackAndI'mProud (talk) 01:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I believe my warm, buttery friend was merely re-creating the name as a placeholder so you could not use it. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Don't think he was referring to me. The stormfronter is referring to Conservepederast. He (CPede) is obliged to declare himself as a convicted person I believe. ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 01:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hmmmm--but is C-ped a sock (as you are, kinda...) or does he have socks? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

A little too convoluted for me at 1:30 am, I'm afraid. ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 01:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Toast is partly right. I was talking about Nutty Roux being allowed to have a sock called Conservapederast. If Conservapederast is allowed, then HatesNiggersAndFaggots should be as well. But if everybody is SO against this name, then I can just make a new account called RapesChildren, since that sort of thing is apparently more ok than racism and homophobia - I promise, I'm a sock of a long-time user here! Just un-vandalbin me so I can make the account, ok? After all, I haven't committed any actual vandalism, or even gotten the chance to - I was judged on my name. SayItLoudI'mBlackAndI'mProud (talk) 01:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

If you're a long time user then you've got a username & are a sysop so you should be able to unbin yourself. ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 01:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

C-Ped is Nutty Roux? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Narr! ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 01:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

MC is a long-time user here... --Kels (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

It's 2:00 am where MC is. Not a common time for him to edit. ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 02:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

And really not his style. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 02:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Err it's only 8 in the Midwest. 02:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, NR is CP, but it hardly matters if you didn't know that, since if you didn't, you couldn't have given privileges to CP that you would only have given if you'd known it was NR. So I retract that, but the question remains: If Conservapederast is ok, why is HatesNiggersAndFaggots not? Or why can I not have my name changed to RapesChildren and be unvandalbinned? PS: Hard to defend myself here when I can only edit once every half hour. SayItLoudI'mBlackAndI'mProud (talk) 02:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

So wait 28 minutes and unbin yourself. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 02:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Note how you don't answer my question about why Conservapederast is an acceptable name and RapesChildren wouldn't be. SayItLoudI'mBlackAndI'mProud (talk) 02:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't, but I wasn't around when he coined it. By the time I twigged onto it, he was already pretty established. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 02:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm confused and none of this makes sense. Aboriginal Noise ^{Theist, barely hanging by a nail} 03:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Apparently we did not find the user name "conservapederast" offensive. It's that simple. ħuman 03:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, I did. But the mob overall disagreed.--Tom Moore^{fiat justitia} 03:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Holy Hell, people. You seriously can't answer why a profanity is not acceptable while a made up word meant to mock a rival blog is? That's sad....no...pathetic is a better word for it. δ_ij$^{i.broke.it.}$ 04:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

And that, in a nutshell, is why it's so easy for folks like MC and TK to bring the business of the site to a standstill on a regular basis. --Kels (talk) 04:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Kels, for saying exactly what I was thinking. Lord of the Goons ^{The official spikey-haired skeptical punk} 04:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Kels has received the payment of one (1) internet. It will be transferred to her account shortly. --User:Theautocrat/Sig 04:50, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I've got a spot on the mantle all set aside for it. --Kels (talk) 04:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Apologies for going off like that. Hard to read through that without fuck snapping though. δ_ij$^{i.broke.it.}$ 18:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

None necessary. He deserved it. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

You know, you're not a bad guy, ToP. Keep it up. δ_ij$^{i.broke.it.}$ 18:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

I just realized it was you who commented on my blog. Thanks for reading, and I hope it keeps your interest. Researcher (talk) 19:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Heads up

Just to give you an orange banner in case we are headed for an edit conflict. As I said, I'm happy to do the copyediting over there. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 17:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC) Doing it now.TheoryOfPractice (talk) 17:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Done what I can, feel free to fix up my fixing up. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 17:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Duly mixed, done for the moment. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 17:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey buddy

How's digs? Aceⁱ⁹ 22:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Good--> Taking some good courses, making progress towards narrowing down the dissertation topis, getting on top of fitness issues and feeling better for it, enjoyed seeing my folks/hometown over the holidays, getting laid regularly, reading a bunch of cool shit for my own edification. Bad--> am working as a teaching assistant for a professor I can't stand, the sun never comes out and when it does it sets by 4PM, Mrs Practice and I have to go back to the weekdays apart/weekends together routine after Monday, and there's no beer in the house. How's you? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Good --> Had a relaxing summer break, the sun is out, picking my new courses for this year which is always fun (until I actually have to study them), getting laid frequently, feeling healthy. Bad --> Concerned about finances and the possibility of losing my job, having trouble finding a new job, slightly concerned as I have a trip to Samoa which I won't be able to pay for if I am made redundant, the future is uncertain. Aceⁱ⁹ 22:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Cheers for the welcome!

Sadly, all I got at CPedia was a ban for 'liberal censorship' after removing teenage-level ranting in the Ellen DeGeneres page. 1-0 for RW I suppose? Webbtje (talk) 19:48, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

-ing

Got {{gerund}} if you want it. Totnesmartin (talk) 19:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

I got your "gerund" RIGHT HERE, buddy. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

I'll ger your und. ^pathetic 20:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Omg, wai u do that?????

Aw, you shouldn't feel left out. Your crazy demotions were probably not the best idea. It makes a point, but just puts food in the troll belly. --^{Ask me about your mother} 19:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Check you email buddy. Aceⁱ⁹ 19:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

I know they weren't the best idea, but I just wanted make a point in a strong way--the complete lack of anyone to have any balls to say "No. You are bad for this community and we're better served not having you around" is what inevitably leads us to HCM. So if TK, why the hell not Fall down? Besides, who's the "troll" in this case? TK? Human? @ Ace. okay.TheoryOfPractice (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Fred for 'crat! --Kels (talk) 19:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Nah, TOP. Dragging MC in by demoting him probably makes his dangler twitch on mention of his name. Damn, I may have just given him a semi. --^{Ask me about your mother} 19:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Haiti

Many thanks, dooooode. (You're fast, BTW) δ_ij$^{i.broke.it.}$ 00:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Just finishing a huge paper on the Haitian Revolution, so it's on my mind. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

It's been a few years since I've been there and I didn't bother looking up any facts. Needless to say, if you want to redo the entire thing, I would not take any offense. All I wrote is what I remember and given where I've been/what I've done since, it has surely been well blended. I'm interested in history, but not enough to really get all my facts straight in the first place. δ_ij$^{i.broke.it.}$ 00:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Break

Catch you on the flip side, dudemeister, have a good week! SJ ^Debaser 16:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

w

You are taking this quite seriously. -- =w= 23:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

It is quite epic lulz. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree but it confuses me. -- =w= 23:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

How so? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't know how he got that title. You reply at lightspeed. -- =w= 00:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah--the category thing? That was just me going a little over-the-top (Get it? TOP?) because he posted something having to do with girlie pictures. I reverted it because it was a little much. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

No I meant the filename. The category was fine and reasonable. -- =w= 00:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, sorry--it was Starfish who linked the title that I'd noticed in CP's recent changes to its original source--he googled it, i guess?. The title caught my eye as I was looking @ CP's recent changes 'cause it just looked weird. Is that wht you're after? Feel better! TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I will get better. Meis are virtually indestructible! -- =w= 00:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Helen Clarke

I changed the pic - she is a former prime minister after all. the new one says more about lovely NZ and its inhabitants. Aceⁱ⁹ 05:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Awesome. is that like your great-grandfathers WWI rifle or something? Also, it's your turn to block TK. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Na, its a pump action 33. My Dad built himself a few huts on some land in the middle of nowhere. Perfect place to wait out the apocalypse. Aceⁱ⁹ 05:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

TK

I unblocked him, I figured we should wait until he actually does something blockable like spamming us with unfunny crap before he gets blocked. --Opcn (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Whatever. You see some guy doing something horrible and you keep inviting him to your parties? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Its like you completely lack an ability to understand basic facts about human behaviour

This is the internet. When you show emotion like you do on the internet you open yourself up for ridicule. This makes you a freakshow. Now cry yourself to sleep tonight and think about what you've done to humanity. OMG (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

As a change of pace I won't cry myself to sleep tonight. Aceⁱ⁹ 22:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Why is MarcusCicero unbinned?
Remember: Hi, This is John's brother. I know he has been using this account for a variety of reasons, none of them productive for his troublesome history of mental health problems. For obvious reasons I don't want to go into details about this but suffice to say my mother and father have decided to withdraw his access from the internet for the duration of his most recent treatment process. I apologise on my brothers behalf for any problems he may have caused this website during his period of instability. As you know, his posts have been of a bizarre quality but that is merely a reflection of his real world mental anguishes. MarcusCicero (talk) 23:09, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
And: 20:48, 5 December 2009 MarcusCicero (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Delaware" ‎ 20:47, 5 December 2009 MarcusCicero (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Argument from incredulity" ‎ 20:47, 5 December 2009 MarcusCicero (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Bohemian Grove" ‎ 20:47, 5 December 2009 MarcusCicero (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "John F. Kennedy" ‎ 20:47, 5 December 2009 MarcusCicero (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Lucid dream" ‎ 20:47, 5 December 2009 MarcusCicero (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Gerald Ford"
And: My glorious run has ended. This is not a case of 'leaving and never coming back', but more a case of 'burn out'. I created a personality on the internet so radically different from the real life version that I've forgotten even what trolls remorse feels like.. (You can thank Refugee over on RWW for providing the impetus) My highlights on RW: Making loads of people mad, especially Ace, Susan, Jeeves (Hi Jeeves! Wanker) and also Kels. Doing my best to persuade half of you that I 'was a dick who has something worthwhile to say', while really just being a dick and doing my best to annoy as many people as possible. Continuously rejecting the label of troll; even though I was the most transparent 'concern troll' in history. Riding the wave of mock grievance; So many times you put me on the centre stage with a semi reasonable grievance and I made sure to maximise the fallout as much as possible. Pretending to be a scholar (I know fuck all) One regret: Stooping to do the mental illness stunt. That was a terrible miscalculation. Adios RW! I may pop in from time to time, but at least now you'll know for sure than I'm a fully fledged troll! MarcusCicero 19:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
And: On the other hand, the temptation to shake the ant farm and watch them scurrying to each others aid is far too great to overcome. MarcusCicero (talk) 10:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Meh. It's not like he's not here alla time anyway. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

So, TheoryOfPractice, who are you rooting for (if either team) in this year's Super Bowl? I, personally, am rooting for the commercials, but that's because it's the main reason I watch. The Goonie 1 ^{What's this button do? Uh oh....} 23:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Bah, that's what YouTube is for. --Kels (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I actually don't really "follow" American football (or much corporate sports anymore) so I don't really have a dog in that race: I do enjoy watching the games if I happen to be walking past a TV (I don't own one) and a game is on, but I can't really find it in myself to invest in really following the whole thing. I'm with you on the commercials though--as much as I hate what they're all about, lotsa smart and funny people are in that racket and they come up with great stuff...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Exactly my thinking on the commercials. While I hate the companies behind them, you gotta appreciate the talent and creativity behind the people who make them. Otherwise, I'm not really a sports fan, myself. Though I do find myself hating the Vikings, but for reasons other then that they suck. Punky ^{Your mental puke relief} 23:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm rooting for New Orleans just because they have a much worse record than the Colts. That's not much of a reason, but there it is. Tetronian ^{you're clueless} 23:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

If I had to pick a team, I'd choose the Saints, too. Simply because they've never won a Super Bowl before, and because they eliminated the Vikings, which I appreciate because the Vikings not going to the Super Bowl is one less piece of bullshit I have to hear in favor of raising taxes to build them a goddamn stadium when we just cut GAMC for the poor. Thank you, Tim Pawlenty, you heartless jackass! The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 23:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I root for whoever is throwing the ball/running from right to left. ħuman 01:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Typical fucking Human, doesn't even give thought to the brave men on the bench. Aceⁱ⁹ 01:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I would have moved his post to begin with, but I didn't want to be called a hypocrite for complaining about him changing posts on others. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 16:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I didn't change nothin'. The page is for a joke debate on banning him, not for him to vent some more. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

He didn't like you moving things... uh-oh... --Irrational Atheist (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

He can go eat a bag of cocks for all I care. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Considering the sock's post on my talk page, it seems he can't get cocks off his mind at all. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 16:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I didn't expect you to care even that much. Irrationalatheist, these are the contributions of my IP, compared to this.--Earthland (talk) 16:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Nx and all that

I know you don't like me, so I'll cut the crap. Why is Nx being allowed to burn posts, even on his talk page? His actions completely lack any modicum of legitimacy.

Yeah, what's up with that? ħuman 07:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

You being a crat and all,

Could you make me a newt as well as a sysop? I'd appreciate it, and I promise to use the power for the forces of good, not stupidity. Corry (talk) 06:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I am a crat but I don't know what a newt is. Aceⁱ⁹ 07:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I bet you think you're pretty fucking smart

but you're not fooling me. Do you honestly think you'll make it into the cabal? I admit that with the backdoor politics that you may have gotten your foot in the door, but by the time voting is over, I will have exposed you for the back-stabbing, power-abusing, lying, cheating, deceitful coward you are. Enjoy your delusion of success while it lasts. When I'm through writing you up, you'll be lucky if the new cabal doesn't server block you. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 21:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

E tu, Brutus. Aceⁱ⁹ 21:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Ace!? WHY??? ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 21:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

'Bout time I got recognition. Cheers! SJ ^Debaser 14:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

prologue

TOP, we've had our differences from day one. The one thing that we could agree on is that this wiki isn't big enough for both of us. We could have gone through the motions and dragged this out into a public debate, but we both knew what the outcome would be: one way or another, you were going to leave this wiki. In a way, I respect you for taking the high road by circumventing that process and bowing out before things got ugly. I don't know if I would have been able to do the same, and I wouldn't have expected you to let me off easy. Looking back on our discussions and deliberations, I caught many glimpses of the rational person I know you can be. It's something that gave me hope in you, and something I would like to see fostered and cared for like the delicate flower you are inside. Where ever you end up, I hope you find a community that will continue to hold you to the coals, intellectually speaking, without you pressing them for lenience or outright clemency. One day, I think you can reclaim the trust you've lost here. Fare the well. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 22:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Neveruse, thank you for your kind words. More importantly, thank you for believing in me. Know that your belief in me fills me with hope that there is, somewhere deep inside you, something worth salvaging, something that will ultimately bring you redemption. Go forward, knowing that you carry in you the potential to bring love and hope to the world. anywhere but here, Neveruse. Anywhere but here. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Why am I not surprised, TOP? Why am I not surprised that you would so wantonly renege on such a hard-fought compromise? Your time here is over. The sooner you realize that, the soon you can began to pull the wool over some other unsuspecting community's eyes, because we're through with you. Don't call, don't send flowers to my work, don't even fucking think about it. Just move on. If there is anything left at the bottom of that pit inside your heart, scrape it together and try to look at this from our point of view. None of this was easy, and dragging it out is just making this harder. Are you some kind of masochist? Why do you keep coming back for more when I'm trying to let you off easy? I'm constantly amazed at the lengths you will go to destroy this community and my life personally. You know what I'm talking about and that shit was not cool. NOT COOL. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 22:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

When this whole sordid affair is over, when the Loya Jirga has come into effect and we have acted on the one thing that really needs to be done--you being de-sysopped, de-cratted, and 404-blocked from seeing the site, I will then do whatever else I deem necessary to ensure that you can no longer sully this community's reputation with your constant antics. And no, maybe it wasn't cool what I did, how I broke the "fourth wall" like that, but given the circumstances--and the photographic evidence that I had--it seemed as if alerting the people who have to live and work with you was the only viable course of action for me. And for them. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for cleaning up after me - seriously. Bob Soles (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem--I hate to think I'm coming off as a jerk in doing so, but srsly, I'm a much better editor than I am article creator. You keep gettin' stuff, I'll keep makin' it look purdy. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

greetings

Erasmus Aloysius Runcible - gentleman, scholar and cat.

17:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Don't unblock EL

The guy is here simply to troll. Instead of unblocking him, find out why he was blocked (as per the comment left on the block). This is why we had the LJ setup. So that people didn't decide to systematically undo what others find should have been done, thus defeating any purpose to the mission at hand. Earthland does not add to this mission and abuses his sysopship. He needs to be removed since he cannot figure out that his actions are trolling. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 20:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Don't tell me what to do. The role of the LJ, as far as I understand it, it decidedly not to maintain permablocks that hotheaded editors wrongly impose on somebody 'cause they're on the rag and feeling a little thin-skinned today. You wanna make a case for permabanning EL? Wait a few days until we've got the LJ sorted out and take it to them. until then chill the fuck out. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 20:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

If you don't want me to tell you what to do, then don't be an ass on my talk page. I banned him because this is not the first time that EL has done this shit and has been told to stop. He obviously won't. Time to be done with him. Besides, what does he add to this site? Absolutely nothing. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your comment here. Thank you for that levelheadedness. I do hope he takes it to heart. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

EC An ass on your talk page? All I did was call you out for a flagrant violation of the site's rules. Show me where I was "an ass," or you're being the troll. I called out EL on his page too, FWIW. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

"What the fuck was that all about?"-That. I made it clear why he got banned. A peek at his previous contributions (the talk page and the ban) would have been very clear as well. So why the need to ask in such a manner like the reason wasn't already known? --Irrational Atheist (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

My new troll script and your problem.

Using my TrollBeGone script, I could easily write you a script that would hide WIGO CP and the talk page so you can't see them? - π 23:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

That would be awesome! Make it so. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay here you go, chuck the following five lines of code in your monobook.js:

importScript('User:Π/Scripts/PageBeGone.js');
function myshitlist(){
   PageBeGone("Conservapedia","What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F");
}
addOnloadHook(myshitlist);

It will need some work before it goes live, but you can beta test it for me. - π 00:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Alright--many thanks, PI. I'll run it for a bit and let you know how it works. Feel free to berak into my monobook page and eff with it if the need arises. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

You didn't have to blank the whole thing, you could just append it. Don't forget to ctrl+f5 to see the changes. What browser are you using? - π 00:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, one bit of code was for CUR's siggy--not necessary. The other was the anti-MC code, and since I'm looking LJ-bound, I should prolly stay up to date on that issue, so yeah...I'm running F-Fox, like all the cool kids...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

That is good, I used a command that I think only works on Firefox 3+ - π 01:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

There is something you must understand

"Pig" is not a nice word. Just in case you didn't know.

But I fully acknowledge the devastatingly painful difficulties that you had to go trough when you reverted the permanent ban that was given to me. After all, I had made a pointless comment, even if it was relatively innocent. Some would say that permanent ban isn't enough for such evil, but you know better, eh?

Don't take this effort to make any kind of answer. I don't need it. You don't need it. I'm just trolling here anyway.

--Earthland (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

"Pig" referred to the size of the page, not to the contents thereof. As for the rest of your comment, I didn't revert the ban because of you, i reverted it because those are the rules...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

I can't follow. Did you invent new definition for "pig"? Or was it typo? --Earthland (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it remains essentially a pig. Wēāŝēīōīď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 20:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

"Pig" can refer to something that is unnecessarily large, bloated, engorged... ħuman 20:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, like your momma. Wēāŝēīōīď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 20:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

I was using the term in Human's sense of it...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 04:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I hope you're happy

Well, Paul, the shit finally hit the fan from your little "prank". I just got fired from my job. Way to take a harmless joke too far. So, you win. I'll fucking leave. Congratu-fucking-lations. If I'd had known the lengths you would go to to protect your precious wiki, I would have left a long time ago. ^{— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block} 19:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thems fighting words! Go get my fucking spoon. Aceⁱ⁹ 20:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

My Mom always told me: You play with the big boys, you're gonna get hurt. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

What's the meaning of this shit you fucking cunts? 05:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Is jokes. Just jokes. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 05:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Hooray for jokes! The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 05:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

EMAIL

FETCH! --The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 01:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied. SIR!. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied, General. Twice, actually. --The Emperor _{Kneel before Zod!} 01:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Ooops

I only meant to revert half of BoN's edit, it had got duplicated. Thanks for fixing it. Jack Hughes (talk) 18:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

s

Sorry I had to undo your usefulness. ;_____; I will get you fries and a milkshake to make up for it. -- =w= 16:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

I love fries. Fries are what I miss eating. Oh god, fries. -- =w= 16:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

^^

Useful ToP is back in town! -- Mei (talk) 05:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, well ,well......

If it isn't TheoryOfPractice! How's it going, man! Been ages, it seems, since I've seen you about the wiki. The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 03:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, was backed up with work for a while, and then needed to get out of the horrible town where I live for a few days. Missed the joint. But because I no longer read CP and have made updates to WIGO:CP and the talk page invisible on my recent changes, it seems as if there are fewer opportunities to get my nose into conversations...but I'll be here regular-like, during the weeks, anyways...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 03:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

I always loved ToP. Aceⁱ⁹ 03:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

I understand where you are coming from on that one. I haven't given a shit about WIGO:CONservapedia for about 6 months now. The Goonie 1 ^{What's this button do? Uh oh....} 03:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

My work IP is 404'd and the only reason I followed CP was to avoid working so........yeah. Now I sit at my desk crying and ruthlessly insulting those beneath me. Aceⁱ⁹ 03:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandal Binned?

Hi, you seem to have vandal binned me (possibly automatically) for using an IP used by MarcusCicero (block ID #487), and while I understand the precaution, I am not he, nor do I know him. Rather I'm editing from my college's IP address, so that may have something to do with it? Could you please unbin me, if you would be so kind? H. Randolph Twist (talk) 01:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Your user name is not vandal-binned. If a particular IP address is, it is for good cause, and you shall, for the time being, have to edit from elsewhere. Eire has great internet service, so it shan't be a problem. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I can vouch that this person is not me. But then again I don't expect this gentleman to prevail; RWs policy of knowingly blocking 15,000 students is absurd but with the new authoritarian regime anything seems to go. Even the once unthinkable.

So, ToP, what type of wine is your favorite? White or red, chardonnay or cabernet? etc., etc., etc... Lord Goonie ^{Hooray! I'm helping!} 02:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm much more of a red guy--Cabernets, Merlots, Zins--anything with a big, rough flavour. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 02:36, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Good man. I, myself, prefer cabernet sauvignons and merlots. AnarchoGoon ^{Swatting Assflys is how I earn my living} 02:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, I do find it a bit absurd, since I do live on my university's campus and thus my options for editing from other locations are somewhat limited... then again, I've never encountered this problem before yesterday. Is there no way around this particular issue? H. Randolph Twist (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind, Nx showed me how to parole myself, it's all cool. Thanks for your time at any rate. H. Randolph Twist (talk) 12:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

It is three in the afternoon in Kiwiland, of course he is drunk. - π 01:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

RE: APPROPRIATE ACCESS

WE HAVE OUR EYES ON YOU. WE SEE WHAT YOU'RE DOING. FORTUNEATELY FOR YOU I WASN'T DIRECTING THE WARNING AT YOU, BUT I AM WRITING YOU UP IF I CAN FIGURE OUT WHO YOU ARE/WHAT FACILITY YOU'RE AT, IF SOMEONE ELSE DOESN'T FIND YOU FIRST. YOU ARE NOT ONLY ABUSING COMPANY BANDWIDTH, BUT ALSO YOU'RE ADMINISTRATIVE PRIVLEDGES HERE BY BLOCKING CORPORATE NETWORK SECURITY STAFF FOR YOUR PERSONAL BENEFIT. I AM WRITING THIS UP SO THAT THIS SITE CAN BE FIREWALLED AS WELL. -IT&S SECURITY

PS, "UNFUNNY" VANDALISM, WHAT A PROFESSIONAL VOCABULARY YOU HAVE. THIS SITE HAS NO BUSINESS IN A PROFESSIONAL SETTING. ^{— Unsigned, by: HCA admin / talk / contribs}

w

I am invisible on your talkpage. Now I will move things around until you think you're being haunted. -- Mei (talk) 00:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Given my current emotional and mental state, it may take more than that, kid....TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

I always think I'm being haunted. Do you want to talk about your emotional and mental state? It helps to talk. Apparently. It's never really helped me as far as I can see, but not talking has definitely not helped, and I am an expert at not talking to people so I can recommend talking in a sort of oblique way. -- Mei (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Triassic Park

How's this idea as a solution in lieu of having a dishonorable mention section in the shrine? Gooniepunk2010 ^{Oi! Oi! Oi!} 05:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

My personal feeling is that it aint something worth glorifying or remarking on. But thats just me. Aceⁱ⁹ 05:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

You're most likely right. I dunno. I'll leave it in my namespace and see where it goes. The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 05:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

I am dry humping the spirit of the lord. What are you doing? Aceⁱ⁹ 05:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm sitting in amazement that we are discussing it without TheoryOfPractice having given any input yet. The Goonie 1 ^{What's this button do? Uh oh....} 06:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

File:AceJesus.jpg

Humping the lord

I just wanted to find some way to memorialize, for better or worse, some of the folks from days gone by who made this place what it is--I'm not super-attached to the idea, though, and will gladly defer to the mob on this...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Nice edits on the Kinsman thing. Researcher (talk) 18:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Anytime, my friend. Your work puts the rest of us to shame...TheoryOfPractice (talk) 18:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't piss me off

I've deliberately left you alone, mainly because you have emotional issues and I have a conscience. Don't think I won't starting laying in to you and all if you join in on the fascist chorus. I can circumvent your pathetic restrictions with such ease - any more of this shit and I swear to plague you into submission until you submit to one of those pathetic 'leaving and never coming back' charades you indulge in every now and then. 66.90.73.223 (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)