User talk:ReptoidKiller

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

because[edit]

satanists dont control anything and we don't need a completly giant post unrelated to the topic on a talk page--Miekal 04:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

If they don't control anything then why did a LaVey Satanist say so?--ReptoidKiller (talk) 04:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Speaking as a "disinterested agnostic" the entire world is truly run by a evil conspiracy 666 new order Illuminati atheism. There, proof the world is secretly run by the atheist antichrists. Crazy people can and will say whatever they want--Miekal 04:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
I think you are misunderstanding what I am saying:
  1. Satanism is what is being accused of controling the media
  1. Said satanist (Who is still a satanist) said that is the case, along with controling scientists.

How is he crazy if he saw it first hand?--ReptoidKiller (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps he was making it up? SophieWilderModerator 21:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
If you read up on LaVery Satanism, then it's a very VERY egotistic philosophy, so that's a very probable reason why he said it.--サトセレ (talk) 00:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Whoa there[edit]

I've put a brake on you. You can now edit once every half hour. Use your time to ponder whether what you post is accurate, rather than mrely fitting your beliefs. Thank you. SophieWilderModerator 10:15, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Lol. 182.230.105.51 (talk) 10:32, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Your reasoning for putting the brakes on them is bullshit, so I've gone ahead and undone it. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 07:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Well then... I thought I was being censored... Turns out I'm not. Thanks.

Let's do a do-over and start on another foot[edit]

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, ReptoidKiller!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

No more[edit]

with the youtube spam, yes?--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 14:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I was spamming? I wasn't on here for months.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes, and? Maybe no more with the youtube spamming, yes?--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 14:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Baseless accusations much? I don't know what you're talking about, but I'm not the one spamming. Spam = Link farm. Spam =/= posting 1 (one) video as proof. Do revert it is, frankly, dishonest. EDIT: And you blocked me for no reason. Goodie. If someone was spamming your site, it wasn't me--ReptoidKiller (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Posting an 8 minute youtube video and telling us we should watch it, with no other attempt to convince us, is youtube spam. It doesn't really matter if you only post one or many. So, again: no more with the youtube spam, yes?--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 14:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes, Call it spam and block me solely because my argument was from Youtube. Critical thinking abound :/. Watch the video. If Edward Snowden is proof of CIA surveillance, than so can a group of whistleblowers be proof ISIS was a CIA creation, ESPECIALLY when they release footage. That's the gist of the video. Watered down, but the gist. Tell me why that's bullshit.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I have a hard time trusting the person who has previously taken the statements of one random person to be obvious proof the Satanism world control conspiracy is true. So, again: no more with the youtube spam, yes? --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 14:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Great way to gloss over what I said, mate. It's funny this video is the one that is handwaved and immediately gets me a 5-minute ban. If you can't explain why the video is bullshit, and instead accuse me of spamming, it's very dishonest. What I said in the past is irrelivent to this discussion.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 14:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
If a person who has a known history of being very easily misled by random youtube videos into believing conspiracy theories, i'm going to have a tendency to dismiss them when they show up later with more youtube videos with "proof" of a conspiracy. So, once again, no more with the youtube video link spamming, yes? If you want to convince me you're right, sending me links to a youtube video is not going to do it. I could throw up a convincing youtube video saying obama is a kenyan national for reals, as discovered by hackers and backed up by super realistic and correct looking documents, and it wouldn't be correct.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 15:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I could throw up a convincing youtube video saying obama is a kenyan national for reals, as discovered by hackers and backed up by super realistic and correct looking documents, and it wouldn't be correct.
And you don't understand why I feel so incredulous by this statement? I'm not a birther, but if such a video with said proof existed, I don't see how it wouldn't be correct.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Give me... idk, half an hour, maybe? And i can post it for you. Welcome to the birther crowd!--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 15:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Funny. That still doesn't explain why my video is bullshit. What I believe is irrelivant. I don't understand why footage of the CIA in the process of staging an ISIS beheading is not proof, and every time I ask this you either accuse me of spamming or gloss over it/mock it with comments like the above. The clear difference between this and the birther example you gave is that such a video DOES exist. You just handwave it and call it spam. If CNN supported that same video you would immediately admit it was real.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
1) I wouldn't, but 2) CNN is an actual news service with people who can verify and source stuff. It isn't some youtube video being shared by an idiot with a history of sharing youtube conspiracy videos and citing them as obvious proof. What your past actions have shown is 100% relevant here, because they leave you untrustworthy as a source on whether the CIA truly created ISIS/ISIL/DAESH just as much as they left you untrustworthy on how the satanists control everything. Your video, without any other backing, is as much proof that the CIA created ISIS as the fake hitchbot video was evidence of the person who destroyed hitchbot.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 15:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your (now closed) coop case[edit]

So... you're not going to get very far with saying "no fair, someone is rejecting my conspiracy theory because my only support for it is a nutty youtube video". No one here likes conspiracy theories, and we have a low general perception of youtube as a supporting source. If you want something extreme to be believed, you should be looking for credible sources, and sites where anyone can post anything aren't going to rise to that level much at all. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 15:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Should my theory be true, obviously it would be censored, correct? You'd be an idiot to believe the government doesnt have some influence on the masses with media whatsoever, of course they'd censor that video, and they have. I've watched the video, and the video is exactly how I described. Not "Hidden footage" and a 3 hour documentary of MSM news, but actual footage. Exactly what it says on the tin. I don't know how I can make myself clearer on that.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 15:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Umm... Nyet, nyet, nyet. WalkerWalkerWalker 15:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
da da da. Watch it, Comrade.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 15:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Nehuya, chuvak.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ 15:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
A convincing looking youtube video is not proof of anything. I can stage faked real evidence too - give me an hour and i'll have a video of somebody dressed up in period Civil War regalia who thinks he time traveled from 1864. And "But the guverment would censor it" is one of the best escape hatches conspiracy nuts ever created. Of course, somehow the big evil all oppressing government has missed this one random youtube video though.----"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 16:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Speak of the Devil, they're actually doing that by throttling out views. Evidence? Nah, you guys wouldn't accept it. I can give you it if you want, but unless it's one of your MSM Bullshit sites, you wouldn't allow it. They dont just censor. Thats nto discreet enough. They throttle it and eventually remove it. it's why the less popular truther channels go first. I will ask: Want the evidence?PS: The video I posted up there was released yesterday, so best watch it if you believe it would be censored if true.--ReptoidKiller (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Here's a guy who posts long YouTube videos about how the Earth is flat and galaxies don't exist. Convincing eh? You, and this guy, just have low standards of evidence to convince you. Other eople have standards based in reality. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 15:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)