User talk:UnicornTapestry

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, UnicornTapestry! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Welcome to teh RatWiki. Peace, love, goats. Thunderkatz^Ho! 10:41, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Hi. Any other questions look here: RationalWiki:Newcomers.--Bob^{bing up} 11:24, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Thank you. Umm, goats? I feel so, so cheesy. --UnicornTapestry 01:20, 1 August 2008 (EDT)

Welcome to the Dollhouse! Only one corn? I have several... ħuman 02:23, 1 August 2008 (EDT)

argh! must wake up before editing!

Welcome anyhow, glad you could make it. We're only small but we're keen.   ^Contribs_Talk 03:04, 1 August 2008 (EDT)

Hi, just glancing at "recent changes" I one of your edit comments was about NPOV. You should be aware that RW is not NPOV.--Bob^{bing up} 03:25, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Hello, UnicornTapestry! You know, no offense, but yours is the third most, er, colorful username here, after Unicorn Rainbow and his knockoff, Shiny Happy Rainbow Unicorn. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 11:28, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

WIP

Wips at two places @ the same time. Who's a busy tapestry then?  ^Contribs_Talk 09:36, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

We tend not to Ping-Pong conversations on here (we're small enough to keep an eye on Recent changes or Watchlist) so I've replied on my talk page.   ^Contribs_Talk 10:28, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

Mission

Having seen one of your recent articles I'm not sure if you're fully up to speed about what the site is about. Might I recommend the RationalWiki:Newcomers guide. Especially the bit "What is a RationalWiki Article?--Bob^{bing up} 16:59, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

Bob, I can tell you're gently rebuking me and since my Over 9000 article was just deleted, I'm guessing the two are related. The Over 9000 was intended to be a groundwork reference for a section on the anti-Scientology anti-Hal Turner group, Anonymous. It wasn't intended to be an article for anime enthusiasts at all, but gave the history of how the term came about.

• With that said, was the article still out of line? Should I have given a rationale on the talk page?

• I looked in vain for What is a RationalWiki Article? Could you give a link to it? Thanks.

best regards, --UnicornTapestry 22:22, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article might do it. ħuman 00:08, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Sorry, the "What is" not specifically mentioned by name in the guide though it is the recommend second link. I see your logic now, but I'm confused by the red links which linked to "4Chan" and "Dragonball Z". Were they also going to have some relevance to Anonymous?--Bob^{bing up} 02:49, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Thank you. In answer, I don't think Drabonball Z is necessary after considering what you had to say. The article's not about anime, but a peek into the 'culture' underlying Anonymous. 4chan might eventually be of interest, as Anonymous and 4chan have informal links, drawing from the same 'members' and sharing the same 'language'. At this point, I know enough to be aware of it, but not enough to write an article.

By the way, good management style. --UnicornTapestry 03:05, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Note the "over 9000" on the Scientology page in the section titled "Don't worry, ma'am, the Internet is here"– That's the fingerprints of Anonymous at work.

--UnicornTapestry 03:13, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Message from the RationalWiki Ministry of Demotion and Personal Impediment

Dear UnicornTapestry, We regret to inform you that you have been demoted to the rank of sysop. You are requested to report to a bureaucrat, at your nearest possible convenience, to be assigned a mop and bucket for the purposes of cleaning up the mess around here. If you have any further questions please refer to the enclosed pamphlet So you are now a sysop. Your Sincerely, Sir Reginald Albert Humfildink-Hollingsworth the Third, Under-secretary of the Chief-secretary of the Personal-secretary of the Minister.

(contritely) I'm so embarrassed.

And all this power… I feel it going… going to my head!

if 'teh' deliberate, set it off with quotes or italics

No. Please try to tell from context. It usually is intentional. ħuman 07:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough, but how about correcting that one item instead of rolling back all corrections including grammar and misspellings?

--UnicornTapestry 07:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, as you said on my talk page, sorry about that, do you want to do it or shall I? ħuman 18:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

I plopped in the change/revert. Thanks, H. --UnicornTapestry 03:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, sorry for mucking it up. ħuman 07:10, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

No sweat. --UnicornTapestry 11:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WP

Oops, didn't realise you were here as well... I'd have been nicer... :( Totnesmartin 13:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

You were very nice! --UnicornTapestry 22:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC)