User talk:User000name

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What did I just read? Am I going to die? Rob, is that you?--Madman (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)The Madman


Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:

Philosopher navbar[edit]

Didn't even know that one existed. And we indeed have a problem with infoboxes that add somewhat useless categories to a page -

Oh wait, I found out you created it just a few moments ago. Still, this one is quite useful; might have to create a few more of these.--JorisEnter (talk) 22:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Better late than never[edit]

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, User000name!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

I saw you hadn't been template-welcomed (the most important welcome!) despite being here for a long time, and your edits look good, so I wanted to give you a thumbs up. So here you go lil' feller. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Applying for ninja[edit]

Hello User000name! I see you've been doing tons of great source fixes across a multitude of articles. Great job, man! But to prevent clogging the recent changes feed, perhaps it would be a good idea if you applied for Ninja to one of the moderators (or however a person is granted Ninja on this site - I was given the keys to the Ninjamobile as something others saw prudent for an editor like me to have in my tool belt, IIRC). So I wish I knew who you should ask specifically ... but look around if you're interested, or try one of the moderators. Keep at it, champ! All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Sysop & Ninja[edit]

As requested. I noticed that you are using the |url= parameter of {{cite web}}; this has the unfortunate consequence of adding the bare link at the end of the reference for some reason (there appears to be something wrong with the code, but no-one knows what). For now, it might be better to use conventional link styles, e.g. |title=[ example website]. Someone noticed that this causes the template not to display the accessdate, but as far as I can see you're not addding that one yet. Good job on those references anyway.--JorisEnter (talk) 22:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

I originally thought that it was an intended feature to display the URL, for users could see the protocol, domain, and (96% of the time) the path of the URL. User000name (talk) 02:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Please don't...[edit]

Post pornographic images on the talk page especially images of someone we have covered on the wiki.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 07:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC) 07:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, will do. User000name (talk) 07:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)