User talk:Zackarycw

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Zackarycw!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Oxyaena Harass 01:29, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ — and these external tools:

  • Rbutr shows user-submitted rebuttals to your current webpage.
  • Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
  • web.archive.org and archive.is can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again! Oxyaena Harass 02:03, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, wizard Sysop has been added to your user rights. Feel free to let your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, bleat ask away. It won't make the math display work better, but you have some extra buttons now. :p — Dysk (contribs) 20:13, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Interesting[edit]

Thanks to arguing with you, I've learned something about vectors - and I normally hate maths. It's been an interesting discussion about what they are, how they plug into RW, and even what RW should be. Thank you! Avida Dollarsher again 06:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

@Avida Dollars My initial definitions of vectors was recursive and unclear. I would like to thank you very much to help me realize this. At the moment I am working on alternative, way more clear definitions to Euclidean vectors. I would love to hear what you think. Thank you a lot for looking into the work I put into it; I really appreciate it. Zackarycw (talk) 06:27, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
I think as a non-mathematician that might be beyond me. My main concern was that the introduction was incomprehensible to lay people. you can go into greater detail further into the article. Avida Dollarsher again 07:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)