Information icon.svg Consider taking the RationalWiki Community Survey 2017 or see the results.

Apollonian and Dionysian

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Thinking hard
or hardly thinking?

Philosophy
Icon philosophy.svg
Major trains of thought
The good, the bad
and the brain fart
Come to think of it

Apollonian and Dionysian is a philosophical dichotomy most commonly associated with Friedrich Nietzsche, which is inspired by but not based on Greek mythology.

It is a dualistic concept, according to which there is a perpetual struggle between two sets of opposing forces or ideals; one associated with Apollo, the god of the sun, the other associated with Dionysus (equivalent to the Roman Bacchus), the god of drunkenness. In his Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche wrote that art is based on a critical balance of these two forces, analogizing it with sex:

The further development of art is bound up with the duality of the Apollonian and the Dionysian, just as reproduction depends upon the duality of the sexes.

The dichotomy[edit]

The Apollonian force is defined by its reliance on reason, order, control, individuality, and sober thought, and seeks to bring philosophic order to the universe. Nietzsche, being most concerned with art in his treatment of the concept, identified the visual arts as embodying an Apollonian force.

More broadly, modern science with its scientific method and methodological naturalism could be seen as an Apollonian force, deriving orderly laws and principles to approximate, as closely as possible, the operation of the universe. The Age of Enlightenment, with its emphasis on reason, science, and the power of thought, was driven by a decidedly Apollonian philosophy.

The Dionysian philosophy is that which embraces mysticism, emotion, chaos, "world harmony," and "collective unity." Nietzsche's general take on the Dionysian is that it is unpleasantly like being drunk.[1]

As an example of a thoroughly Dionysian event, Nietzsche cites the early modern European dancing mania: enormous throngs of people dancing wildly through the streets to the point of collapse, not knowing where they were going or why they were dancing. Another example of a Dionysian philosophy is Romanticism, the counter-Enlightenment movement that emphasized human intuition and opposed the scientific rationalization of nature.

Camille Paglia's interpretation[edit]

Camille Paglia, the noted "dissident feminist," in her 1990 book Sexual Personae, expands on the idea of the Apollonian-Dionysian dichotomy. For Paglia, much of Western culture can be understood as a complicated interplay and struggle between the Apollonian and the Dionysian. She associates Apollonian with rationality, celibacy, intellectualism, restraint, and goal-oriented progress; the Dionysian (or Chthonian) is associated with irrationality, ecstasy, ignorance, anti-intellectualism, sloth, sexual indulgence, and unrestrained procreation. Paglia associates Dionysian principles with Pagan religions and Apollonian principles with Judeo-Christianity noting, for example, that Paganism celebrates that use of images in worship while Christianity and Judaism tend to discourage such images (Catholicism and the Orthodox churches are exceptions, being partly outgrowths of Roman paganism).

But she takes the dichotomy one step further than Nietzsche, by associating the Apollonian with men and the Dionysian with women, and then hypothesizing that all progress in civilization was made by Apollonian forces, viz., men rebelling against the Dionysian wildness of women.

Paglia argues that historical fact of male domination is arts, politics and science is ultimately rooted in sexual anxiety. Men are born of and dominated by their mothers during childhood before entering puberty and beginning their lifelong fascination with and fear of women's sexual and reproductive power. Feeling the risk of engulfment by female nature, men are compelled to emphasize their distinct identity with creative and intellectual pursuits. Yet men's anxieties are never far from the surface, given that male fascination with women has been the single most enduring feature of Western art. Women, in contrast, have traditionally devoted most of their mental and physical energy to pregnancy, nursing, childrearing, etc, and have thus lacked the time and energy that men have been able to devote to other pursuits.

As evidence of her thesis, Paglia makes several key observations:

- First, that male-dominated cultures have made more enduring contributions, whether good or ill, to world culture than female-dominated cultures (e.g., Classical Athens vs. Minoan Crete).

-Second, Paglia notes that women who have made enduring contributions to art, science, politics and feminism tended to be lesbian or childless, and/or have been wealthy enough to hire wetnurses and nannies to handle the energy sapping and time-consuming details of childrearing (e.g., Sappho, Hildegard of Bingen, Elizabeth I of England, Catherine the Great, Queen Victoria, Emily Dickinson, Jane Ellen Harrison, Mother Theresa, Simone de Beauvoir, Katherine Hepburn, Amelia Earhart, Frida Kahlo, Oprah Winfrey, Andrea Dworkin, Mary Daly, Sonia Sotomayor, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Streisand, etc).

Paglia agrees that women have often been unjustly excluded from some careers and fields of study, but nonetheless argues that her thesis accounts for male domination of arts and culture more accurately than the strong Marxist and social constructionist claims of second-wave feminists which, she notes, tend to ignore or denigrate basic science and biology:

Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials. But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper. Male conspiracy cannot explain all female failures. I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, [John] Milton, or Kant. Genius is not checked by social obstacles: it will overcome. Men's egotism, so disgusting in the talentless, is the source of their greatness as a sex. [...] Even now, with all vocations open, I marvel at the rarity of the woman driven by artistic or intellectual obsession, that self-mutilating derangement of social relationship which, in its alternate forms of crime and ideation, is the disgrace and glory of the human species.[2]

Gloria Steinem, icon of second-wave feminism -- and, incidentally, childless -- being awfully put out by Paglia's thesis, stirred up a tempest in a teacup, with Steinem comparing Paglia to Adolf Hitler and Paglia comparing Steinem to Joseph Stalin.[3]

Further reading[edit]

  • Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy, 1872.
  • Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae, Yale University Press, 1990.

References[edit]

  1. Apologies to Douglas Adams.
  2. Paglia, Camille (1991). Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson, NY:Vintage, p 653
  3. http://www.divamag.co.uk/diva/features.asp?AID=1918&s=1