RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3500Goal: $3500

Essay talk:Satan is the father of lust

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

If Satan is the father of lust, who's the mother? FuzzyCatPotato of the Fervent Cables (talk/stalk) 04:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

...and I guess that would make God the grandfather of lust. Also if you're Mormon, it'd make Jesus the uncle of lust. --Inquisitor (talk) 04:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
God has nothing to do with lust save banishing it and eradicating it from the face of the Earth because it is an utterly deplorable, absolutely disgusting sin that destroys people, careers, society, and creates pyschos who are complete freaks of nature. It is what is bringing this moral chaos, ambiguity that should not exist, and has brought many confused and disgustingly reprehensible people who are going to destroy the Earth with their peculiar insistence of the flesh. God has nothing to do with the lust that Satan perpetuates to further his goals, quite contrary to the message found in Matthew 5:28. --Elvis is King (talk) 05:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Does God have no control over the actions of Satan? If he does, why doesn't he do anything? Also, if God is opposed to Satan, why did he create him in the first place? Didn't he know at the time of creation that he was going to do these bad things that God is against? Super Dude,What does mine say? Sweet! 07:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Corruption of God's plan for life by Satan is the reason such abominations exist due to sin. ----Elvis is King (talk) 20:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh cool, Taylor Swift's biggest fan is back. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
You do realize I do not support the liberal abomination that is this woman who is ruining the moral foundation of the United States of America, and for you to accuse me of such is libel, and you shall take back such a remark at this instant or you will lose all credibility. --Elvis is King (talk) 20:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
What's so bad about Taylor Swift? At least she's not a sex-obsessed attention whore like most other pop divas, right? 141.134.75.236 (talk) 20:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
She is a filthy liberal who promotes homosexuality, alcohol use, and self love, which are all contrary to God's Word. --Elvis is King (talk) 20:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
How did I not grasp that you were a satire account the first time 'round? It seems obvious now. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 21:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
You do not realize I am telling the truth. No one has substantiated their claims and are throwing out accusations like typical liberals. No one has evidence that I am a satire account or a fan of Taylor Swift. --Elvis is King (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
You are the one making the claim that Taylor Swift is evil. Burden of proof is on you to prove it, not us to disprove it. CorruptUser (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I am not fan of this filthy liberal who engages in flagrant displays of flesh and sexuality which are against God's Word. This is quite obvious. --Elvis is King (talk) 21:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I didn't know she was filthy. She looks pretty clean in most of her music videos. And I'm not sure where you get that she promotes masturbation or getting drunk. Seem like unsubstantiated claims to me. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, those claims without substantiation are Elvis's (Elvii?) idea of libel...so it must be libeling a big star with lots of money to pay lawyers right? -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk)
Only liberals are afraid of the truth. --Elvis is King (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

She wears unacceptable crass attire, and she engages in such sins as accepting homosexuality, partaking in alcohol use, and promotes self love with her flagrant disregard to modesty and decency. --Elvis is King (talk) 21:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

She wears attire that it's completely normal for a girl to wear in modern American culture. It's hardly fair to blame her for the culture she grew up in. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
God will never accept such immoral attire that promotes disregard to Biblical principles and self love that will tear apart the moral foundation of America, and no one here has substantiated the fallacious claim that I am a fan of hers. --Elvis is King (talk) 21:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I doubt that claim was meant to be particularly serious. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
So you have admitted that there is no substantiation to such a claim. My goal is to ensure that everyone knows of the vile ways of this evil sick deviant woman. --Elvis is King (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Also, your unfounded assertions regarding Miss Swift aside, I think it's quite sacrilegious for you to speak on behalf of God and assert to know how God would act and judge. Unless you have any proof that you're a prophet of God, I suggest you bow down to the Lord Almighty and beg for forgiveness. I hope for your sake that God is more tolerant and forgiving towards sinful and blasphemous behaviour than what your assertion earlier would suggest. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I have read God's Word and I fully know His judgment on the evil fools who dare defy Him because it is self evident and I know and see that it is going to ruin the nation and the world. This evil cretin Swift supports self love through her vulgar and crass attire that the Lord will judge her for wearing due to its very killing of innocent lives. --Elvis is King (talk) 00:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Ha, you consider a bunch of old manuscripts written by people that weren't even born yet when the events are said to have taken place the Word of God? You insult God, considering such lowly worldly documents to be worthy of the name "Word of God". Repent, sinner! Truly, your blasphemy knows no bounds. May God have mercy on your soul. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 00:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
The Word of God was authored by God through His direct inspiration of the human authors, and the King James Bible is the only reliable translation of the Word in English. --Elvis is King (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
I guess Satan has too gravely indoctrinated you into this ludicrous ideology for you to be saved. I weep for your soul. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
I guess you will not accept the true Word of God, and do not heed the will of the Lord to have a love for the Word, and not the flesh, as you worship the heathen seductress Swift. --Elvis is King (talk) 01:22, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
It's funny, since "the Word" that you're so obsessed about is just as material as Swift's physical features, which you seem compelled to see in a seductive light. Why do you disrespect the Lord Almighty so, by praising a mere book—a material object, whose worship contitutes idolatry—to such ridiculous heights that it would seem to challenge the One Supreme God in importance? Verily, your ludicrous heresy knows no shame; and your hipocrisy did not escape my notice. You commit the very sins that you accuse others of committing. May God have mercy on your soul. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 08:22, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Swift obviously dresses in this fashion to sell heathen self-love and to ruin God's plan for the world, because her kind are all for secular humanism. The Word is God's revelation to humanity, and as such is not worldly like the attire that Swift is ruining America's moral foundation with. There is a glorious time in America's history where such attire would have been against the law, but it is not. Alas, this great corruption is akin to the corruption that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed over. I weep for America's future, and I will not tolerate being libeled as a fan for the seductress who wants to see the demise of America. --Elvis is King (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Again with these blasphemous assertions? You may insist on denying the sins you commit, but God sees through your lies. Repent and perhaps the Lord Almighty will show you mercy. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 01:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I do not commit sins. I am right with God, and I spend considrable time studying His Word, and excising liberal vulgar heathen abominations. --Elvis is King (talk) 02:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Such arrogance. Have you forgotten that pride is sin and humility is virtue? You lie, you blaspheme and you commit the sin of hubris, and then you lie once more to deny all your sins! Such shamelessness! By God, sinner, repent! Do you truly wish to invoke the Lord Almighty's wrath upon your person? 141.134.75.236 (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
You do not realize that I am more principled and conservative than you could ever hope to be, and I revere and am right with the Lord. I do not engage in liberal sins like all of these atheist nerds who don't care about anything. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
So you persist in your denial and your arrogance? Truly, is there any way to make you see the error in your ways? May the Lord guide you back to the flock, for verily, you are a lost lamb that has wandered greatly from the sacred path. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Where is the evidence of Taylor Swift promoting "self love"? I need to study it. Fonzie (talk) 23:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
[1] This is one such example. --Elvis is King (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
For an omnipotent, omnipresent being, God sure is taking his time in making his judgment on Ms. Swift. Sure, he may just be waiting until Judgment Day, but by then, it's kinda late for anyone to take notice of the consequences. The only one who seems to be making judgment is you, and as I understand Christian doctrine, that's something only the big guy gets to do. Perhaps, just perhaps, God couldn't care less about Ms. Swift and her wardrobe choices. There is the slight possibility that he's got bigger fish to fry, what with war, famine, AIDS, global warming and so on. Worm (talk) 08:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
God's people must warn of iniquity, and the ramifications for this crass attire are far more severe than famine, AIDS, war, or hocus pocus heaty cooly nonsense. We are talking about millions of potential lives lost that never even got a chance. God weeps for the loss of His people. --Elvis is King (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Obviously, the only reason you're wasting your time with this gibberish about Ms. Swift is your burning unrequited love for her. The only reason you're droning on and on about her and blaming her for "self-love" is because you're the one wanking over her, and are guilty over it because of some ancient book. She's really fucking hot so nobody cares what you wank to, Jimbo. Just get over it and stop raving like a damn right wing lunatic. --Elvis is King loves Taylor Swift (talk) 00:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
You are libeling me and I order you to stop. I do not like her, do not endorse her outfits, and I most certainly do not abuse the body God gave me because I was created in His image. You are a moronic liberal and you need to get a life, or else you shall perish eternally. --Elvis is King (talk) 17:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Either you're...[edit]

...a troll or a fucking idiot.--Arisboch (talk) 19:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Why can't it be both? CorruptUser (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
I am a true, real, conservative intellectual who cares about the future of America. --Elvis is King (talk) 01:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Could be Poe: note the drugged-out "Federal Agent" Elvis image from the Nixon meeting on his/her user page. Bongolian (talk) 04:42, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Not could be,certainly, no one talks like this...even mental patients have limits on their absurdity. This is more absurd than Ignatius J. Reilly. Good performance but needs a little work :-D -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
You heathens simply cannot realize the truth that is being presented to you. I am a steward of truth and life and God, and it is a shame that you do not see this. --Elvis is King (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Parodists or not, you're boring and repetitive. Get a new act. --Inquisitor (talk) 02:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you support the liberalism promoted by this demon? --Elvis is King (talk) 02:43, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Does this mean that[edit]

Every time I get a boner (and that is often) there are demons in my penis? |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png Don't they call people like you stalkers? 03:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, because such an evil atrocity is of Satan, and not of God, and is a product of the Fall of man.--Elvis is King (talk) 03:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
So, if I manage to get into Heaven, will I no longer get boners? |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png Get the paddles, he's having a cancer! 03:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
These do not exist in heaven. They are a product of sinful lust, and sin does not exist in Heaven. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:37, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
You're supposed to be describing Heaven, not Hell, mate. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png Because I'm a terrorist! 03:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
To be honest, sexual pleasure, in my experience, is vastly overrated. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Clearly, you need more Satan. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Star of David.png That's just, like, your opinion, man. 03:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Satan is the very origin of sexual pleasure, and no one needs to appease Satan for trying to engage in such an utter abomination. It also can lead you to become incompetent like Chicken Boy. --Elvis is King (talk) 03:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations![edit]

This quote is on FSTDT.-ⅅℐᎯℳᎾℕDⅅℐЅC1 (talk) 00:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)