Miles Mathis

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
A misplaced Californian surfer who happens to look exactly like Miles Mathis (circa 1990, colorized)
Style over substance
Pseudoscience
Icon pseudoscience.svg
Popular pseudosciences
Random examples
Some dare call it
Conspiracy
Icon conspiracy.svg
What THEY don't want
you to know!
Sheeple wakers
It has never been understood how a gas maintains its energy, despite a collosal [sic] number of collisions.
—Miles Mathis, who has never heard of conservation of energy[1]

Miles Mathis (born 1964) is an American artist, poet, writer, pseudoscientist and conspiracy theorist.

Mathis is best known for his outlandish and often ridiculous theories. For instance, that π (pi) is actually equal to 4, with the caveat that it be a "kinematic situation";[2] however, not one single reputable scientist agrees with this far-fetched nonsense. Mathis thinks that standard mathematical derivatives are incorrect — overturning almost all math and science, ever. He has also invented a charge field theory which, like all of his other myriad theories, has yet to pass the scrutiny of a basic peer review.

In addition to his math and science ineptitude, Mathis is also a raving conspiracy theorist.

Scientific thoughts[edit]

The pi=4 theory[edit]

Quantitatively, this may be THE biggest error in all of math and physics, since every single physical equation with π in it must now be thrown out and redone.
—Miles Mathis[3]

For those who want to go straight to the pure mathematics of the theory (without all the tedious verbiage), read "The extinction of pi short version",[4] which contains his comical attempt at a formal mathematical proof.

Listed below are the Mathis papers that describe his zany wronger than wrong unorthodox pi=4 theory:


A well-written critique of the pi=4 theory has been written by computer scientist Mark Chu-Carroll.[5]

Derivative falsehood[edit]

Mathis claims that the derivatives used in calculus of many elemental functions (log(x), ln(x), etc.) have been calculated wrong,[6][7] and therefore any math or physical experiment that relies on them must also be wrong. His evidence for this claim is nothing more than a reference to his own articles where he redefines the derivative;[8] basically turning it into a rough approximation (an average value).

Unified field theory[edit]

See the main article on this topic: Theory of everything
This paper is not a historical overview of failed Unified Field Theories. Nor is it a philosophical treatise on the idea of the Unified Field. Nor is it an esoteric model based on extravagant and untestable hypotheses. Nor is it the revelation of some new math, so difficult it requires large computers just to store the equations.
—Miles Mathis, The Unified Field Theory[9]
This means that if the Earth were denser, you would weigh less, not more. You weigh less on the Moon not because it is less dense, or because it has less mass, but because its foundational E/M field is stronger. And its foundational E/M field is stronger because the Moon’s radius is smaller than the Earth’s. Although the Moon’s body is less dense, as a whole, its E/M field is more dense, on the surface. And this is simply because it has so much less surface area than the Earth (13 times less). You can’t just look at mass or density, you have to look at field lines; and the density of those field lines at the surface determines the strength of the foundational E/M field.
—Miles Mathis, What is G?

Mathis is perhaps most notable for his screed on the Unified Field Theory, which purports to derive a unified field equation, "the solution of a very long mystery."[9] He provides no sources for this theory except for his own. His theory is essentially an esoteric model based on extravagant and untestable hypotheses.

This means that the dark matter math is also a type of modified Newtonian dynamics. It is modified in that it takes the definitions and turns them upside down. We could call it a FAFND: a falsified and fudged Newtonian dynamics.
—Miles Mathis, deeply diving into alternative scientific theory that no one is capable of understanding except for Miles Mathis[10]

The majority of his papers are an exercise in trying to justify a haphazard Unified Field, in which anything goes, including a mathematical proof of pi equaling 4.[2][11] He states that he can say and do anything he wants because he has to answer to nobody.[note 1]

Mathis has penned a couple of books that collect various random screeds from his web site together and attempts to pass them off as legitimate science.[1][12]

Conspiracy theories[edit]

Mathis subscribes to quite a number of conspiracy theories, usually by the effect of "X person faked their death", "Y event was a hoax/staged" or "Z is an intelligence asset". Given that belief in conspiracy theories is often motivated by a sense of "special-ness", and Mathis claims to have overturned almost all mathematics and science, this isn't surprising.

  • The Boston Marathon bombing was faked.[13]
  • The Sandy Hook mass shooting is a "scripted tragedy".[14]
  • Unsurprisingly, he's also a birther and 9/11 truther.[15]
  • All major internet sites, NASA, all universities, mainstream physics and basically everything else (like bookstores) are infiltrated by the CIA.[16][17][18]
  • John Lennon faked his death and is currently living in Canada.[19]
  • The Zodiac killings were faked.[20]
  • Stephen Hawking died and was replaced by an impostor years before his reported death.[21]
  • The Lincoln assassination was faked.[22]
  • The English Revolution was faked.[23]
  • That every single historical figure since at least the French Revolution, and perhaps since the Renaissance, Including Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler and the Romanovs has been a "gay Jewish actor" completely controlled by "mostly Jewish industrialists" and had their deaths faked.[24][25][26][27][28]
  • Every event, including the sinking of the USS Indianiapolis, the sinking of the Titanic, the Battle of Iwo Jima, Custer's Last Stand and literally everything else was either faked entirely or almost entirely, with fake photos and storylines.[29][30]
  • That since at least Shakespeare (who was a committee led by the conspirators) there has been an intelligence conspiracy to dumb people down by making entertainment and/or education be crappy or irrational on purpose so that the people who consume it become less logical or rational and thus less likely to oppose or comprehend the conspiracy.[31][32][33][34]
  • That everything above and more that happened since WW2 was a part of "Operation Chaos/Kaos", which is referenced frequently many of his papers. The point is to make people confused, irrational and "turn their minds to mush" so that people don't question physics establishment, resist the conspiracy and buy more things they don't need.[35]
  • Just... you name it, he has a theory about it.

Mathis regularly adds dozens of other equally absurd conspiracies.[36] Even if we assume that everything he says is true, then we should refer to the Conspiracy theory page's checklist in part 4: especially logistics and plausibility, as assuming everything to be true would require the conspiracy to have potentially tens of and very possibly hundreds of millions of people being involved or more and not massively spilling the beans, including every historian in the entire world, possibly for four centuries or even millenia (one Mathis reader thinks that it goes back to before the Establishment of Israel, and the word "God" was perhaps referring to them).[37][38][39][40][41] The conspiracy would have to be at least as big as the size of the Flat Earth conspiracy (Which Mathis claims to be a NASA/CIA puppet movement to prevent the questioning of physics). besides the size, the conspiracy is also smart enough to hide from scrutiny these people’s secret allegiances with the powers that be from the masses, rumblings and exposures about inconsistencies with the official story from those not in on it (which is basically literally almost everyone except Mathis), eliminate the most significant leaks, etc. while at the same time being so bone-headed that they apparently can't forge photos or create consistant or believeable stories for their alleged actors.[note 2] Mathis himself says that currently "Something on the order of 10 million people have been hired in the US alone" and includes we at RationalWiki as "in on it" (one activity includes CIA actors/agents going to schoolboard meetings to to steer/undermine... something).[42][43], so questions such as logistics, benefits and exposure are quite useful (example, if so many of the photos and stories are as obviously fake a Mathis says they are, then why has nobody before in history, even and especially every-men on the streets (since he says he almost exclusively uses Wikipedia, despite also calling Wikipedia a CIA front, Geni.com, a few other "mainstream" sites for research, plus "logic") call out them as fake entirely (if they have, then who, when and what did they say)? If the stories are also allegedly so implausible/impossible/contradictory/plain crappy, say a painting that looks to new to be painted at the time, why haven’t student academics (who may have access to various archives and more knowledge then laypeople) ever piped up? Speaking of that, why has nobody “in on it”; the photographers, editors, actors, film directors, extras, storyline writers and more ever come out publicly and explicitly reveal the centuries long gambit? If they are just censored by the “mainstream”, why haven’t Chinese or Russian or French or anyone else’s intelligence agencies ever try to uncover it themselves? All these questions are handwaved by Mathis: they are all either useful idiots, in on it too, or mostly being censored and squelched by the controlled mainstream media, saying that questions about lack of exposure are just "misdirection" and that leaks of the conspiracy are just not reported by said media (If that is true, then how did someone who "exposed" the moon landing, Bill Kaysing, become so well known among conspiracy theorists or get his book published at all if they control the media so totally? If you say they "blackwashed" him afterward, why even bother when you can squelch the bug while it's small?).[44][45][46][47] And the elephant in the room: If the ruling elites are so incompetent in so many respects (leaving compromising data openly available on the internet and playing games with Mathis using even crapper shills all allegedly reading from the same script instead of unpersoning him, having their actors all be gay, Jewish and related to each other, et al., how in the world have they gotten this far without having a fuck-up that reveals the whole charade? (Mathis says 9/11 was the big fuck up, but this whole mess should have crumbled long ago such as by: rouge agents/traitors, big information leaks or running out of resources for prepetuate the scheme).

Anti-Mathis scientist conspiracy[edit]

To quote from Mathis' page "debunking" conventional interpretations of the Cavendish experimentWikipedia:[48]

You cannot find anything against Cavendish on the internet. I discovered the existence of one critique by S.J. Barnett, from 1902, but the abstract had recently been deleted by Harvard. Apparently too many people were beginning to look at it, and they had to take it down.

The only abstract I could find was this one, by P.V. Czipott in STI, from 1983:

A superconducting gravimeter was used in a laboratory physics problem for the first time in the inverse square law of gravitation. The gravimeter test mass was used to measure the force exerted by a 325 kg source mass as a function of the separation between the masses. The results of the experiment are interpreted in terms of two models of non-Newtonian gravity, and compared to limits established by previous experiments. A statistically significant deviation at the level of 7.5 parts in 10 to the 3rd power from Newtonian behavior is observed. It does not conform to either of the non-Newtonian models…

That sounds kind of dangerous to me, and I predict this abstract will soon be deleted as well.

The rest of the post asserts that science paywalls — rather than being relatively innocent capitalism-fueled endeavors — are set up to hide information.

Anti-semitism[edit]

Mathis exhibits blatant anti-semitism in his writings. He has claimed that many non-Jewish individuals are actually Jewish, including Jack NicklausWikipedia,[49] C.S. Lewis,[50] Donald Trump,[51] Elon Musk,[52] Adolf Hitler,[53] Napoleon Bonaparte,[54] and Pierre-Simon de Laplace.[54]

Persecution Complex[edit]

Unsuprisingly, Miles Mathis has a persecution complex suitably sized to his percieved genius. He thinks that everyone, other conspiracy theorists, mainstream theorists, all academics and other assorted naysayers to his theories are never just sheeple innocently repeating what they were taught to believe, but CIA fronts/agents/hires, employed to keep people off his research, and he regularly accuses people of being controlled opposition:[55]

Their (QAnon, Edward Snowden and Julian Assange) main job is to keep people off my research. All three arose soon after I hit the scene and my numbers began going superviral...Google is now removing my name from all searches, Twitter and Youtube are deleting all mention of me, and so on.[note 3] It STILL isn't working, since they were too late: so many people now know of me that I can continue to exist and grow only on word of mouth. Big Tech hasn't yet figured out how to squelch word of mouth, though it is doing its best. That is part of what lockdowns are about: it stops people from talking about me in coffee shops, restaurants, and other in-person gatherings...The government is actually censoring text messages, but that just drives people to real calls. Are they actively disconnecting real phone calls? Probably.

Response to RationalWiki[edit]

Mathis got mad at this page, alleging that we at RationalWiki "probably come out of Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, since they look to be a psychological operations unit"[56]. Here are some quotes from another of his responses:[57]

RationalWiki (which is known by most people outside their offices as RatWik or RatDik[note 4]) now has a page on me, which is nice. I appreciate the promotion. They could just not mention me at all, which, considering what they say about me, would be the "rational" thing to do. If they are right and I am just a deluded crank, why have Google redirect all searches on Miles Mathis to their page? Why the obvious and pathetic smear campaign? Do you really need to smear deluded cranks? No, logically and rationally, you can ignore deluded cranks, because they are no threat to any real science. Therefore, logically and rationally, the fact that they feel it necessary to slander me with this prominent transparent project is another sign they are threatened.

I am kicking their sorry asses and the asses of their masters all over the field on a daily basis. But rather than respond in a scientific manner by addressing what I actually say, they hire a bunch of nameless pussies hiding behind fake sites to build little "snarky" pages with zero content. I encourage you to read their anonymous response to me, and compare it in content to my papers.

They actually attack Newton on a page about me! Amazing. It's an ego-trip alright, but one they just launched me on themselves. I can just see those who hired them finally getting around to reading this: "What? You compared him to Newton? You boneheads! Why not put him on the same pedestal with Leonardo and Einstein while you are at it! We hire you to slander this guy on a half-page and you can't even get that right!"

I am probably already getting more hits than all of RatDiki, and this will just add to the gap. I certainly have more content. If Google didn't pad the numbers of these Intel-front websites like RatDiki by many orders of magnitude and suppress mine, we could discover that truth, but as it is we probably never will.

While they are waving their rubber swords in the air, glorying in the movements of their own girly arms, I am lopping their genitals off—and they are already too emasculated to notice. If they had a lick of sense, they would have consulted my previous disembowelings of their confreres—who are now walking around dickless in Langley or Harvard or Berkeley or somewhere—and begged off. But as proof they can't read, they keep lining up for more.

That's right, RatDiks, while you are and your pals are writing from sub-basement 12 at Langley—sucking on fumes from the boiler room—my writing committee is nested in the spire of the Burj Khalifa, getting messages through the windows from eagles flying in from Etna and Everest. So you may as well tap out.

He — or someone who writes a lot like him — really doesn't like this page.[58][59][60]

Notes[edit]

  1. In this case, Miles needs to answer to nobody because nobody will pay attention.
  2. Guess paying the actors the outrageous salaries needed to never reveal that they were puppet actors with fake photographs, geneologies and life stories means that the editor and photographer's budget had to get cut.
  3. As of Thursday, September 16th, 2021, they have not done this.
  4. Side note: Nobody uses "RatDik". Miles chose to say this literally only because it's a childish joke.

External links[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Miles Mathis, The Un-Unified Field: And Other Problems. AuthorHouse, 2010. ISBN 1452005133
  2. 2.0 2.1 The Extinction of π. "I show that in all kinematic situations, π is 4. For all those going ballistic over my title, I repeat and stress that this paper applies to kinematic situations, not to static or geometric situations. I am analyzing the equivalent of an orbit, which is caused by motion and includes the time variable. In that situation, π becomes 4. I will also remind you this is not just a theory: it has been indicated by many mainstream experiments, including rocketry tests and quantum experiments"
  3. http://milesmathis.com/pi2.html
  4. http://milesmathis.com/pi3.html
  5. "Grandiose Crackpottery Proves Pi=4"
  6. http://milesmathis.com/log.html
  7. http://milesmathis.com/ln.html
  8. http://milesmathis.com/are.html
  9. 9.0 9.1 The Unified Field Theory.
  10. How my Unified Field solves the Galactic Rotation Problem and how the dark matter math is fudged.
  11. http://milesmathis.com/pi4.html
  12. Miles Mathis, The Incorporation of Light. lulu.com, 2011. ISBN 1105226840
  13. The Boston Marathon or the Case of the Four Fences. "The good thing about these recent events is that they are so poorly faked that a lot of people are catching on. If they can keep us talking about three fake people who were fake-killed in Boston or the 27 people who were fake-killed in Sandy Hook, they can keep our eyes off the real tragedies."
  14. The Alleged Sandy Hook Tragedy. "It is difficult to say what really happened at Sandy Hook, but as with other scripted tragedies, it is becoming easier and easier to say what didn't happen. The story you are being sold in the mainstream media didn't happen."
  15. 911 Truth and Obama's Birth. "I think pretty much everyone knows that 911 was an inside job. We know that cellphone calls from the planes were faked. We know that video of the planes going into the towers was faked. We know that the 19 hijackers were either made up or were under the protection of the US government. We know that there is no evidence they were on the planes, and that there is much evidence that many of them were not on the planes… The Certificate of Live Birth will turn out to be Obama's Watergate. Why? Because it is a fake. But it is not just a fake, it is a fake so fake that it will be guaranteed to be found out. Absolutely no one will be fooled. Every last person in the world is figuring out that this is a ham-handed fake (starting with those who know how to use Photoshop)."
  16. The Wiki-Mandarins. "Most people don’t seem to know how to find alternative information, so they end up at the big misinformation sites—sites underwritten or owned by big corporations or the government. Many of these sites read as if they have recently been cleaned by the CIA or the FBI or both. In fact, they have. I seriously think that Wikipedia may have been infiltrated by the CIA." Strange, considering he seemingly uses Wikipedia extensively alongside another site he says is a front for the conspiracy; Geni.com
  17. http://milesmathis.com/control.pdf
  18. http://mileswmathis.com/boycott.pdf "One of the ways I avoid new books is by avoiding the bookstore. I haven't been to a Barnes & Noble or similar bookstore in years. Why? Because they don't have any real books. Like the major newspapers and magazines, the bookstores were taken over long ago. They are just fronts for the CIA. I suspect they are subsidized and they may be run directly from Langley. Again, I have been avoiding mainstream bookstores for at least 20 years, but I only recently figured out why they don't have any real books. Real books don't fit their agenda. They want you reading Oprah books on self-help or pseudo-psychology. Either that or fake history books, fake political books, or fake current events books. They want your reading experience to be totally manufactured by their inserted agents. Yes, they still have some classics, but only the classics that don't interfere with their program. You will find that most classics that contain any useful information have been phased out. And the ones that remain are fronted by asinine introductions and ugly covers. They are sprayed with formaldehyde, coated with toxins, inserted with tracking devices, and then marked up to three times their value. You can get old first editions on abebooks or ebay for cheaper than the smelly new books.
  19. http://mileswmathis.com/lennon.pdf
  20. http://mileswmathis.com/zodiac.pdf
  21. http://mileswmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
  22. http://mileswmathis.com/lincoln.pdf
  23. http://mileswmathis.com/charlesI.pdf
  24. http://mileswmathis.com/lenin.pdf
  25. http://mileswmathis.com/stalin.pdf
  26. http://mileswmathis.com/hiller.pdf
  27. http://mileswmathis.com/putsch.pdf
  28. http://mileswmathis.com/benito.pdf
  29. http://mileswmathis.com/custer.pdf
  30. http://mileswmathis.com/indian.pdf
  31. http://mileswmathis.com/shake.pdf "In short, not as much has changed in the past 400 years as you think. The Shakespeare writing committee was doing pretty much the same thing the Hollywood and TV writing committees are doing now: turning your little mind into mush. These plays aren't boldly irrational by accident, any more than new scripts are boldly irrational by accident. They can't have you expecting plots or character actions to make sense, because if they did, you might expect life to make sense. If life made any sense, you might figure out how to take part in it in a sensible way, and they can't have that. They want you so confused you cannot possibly respond to any of their projects, other than go along with them. For the most part, they want you non-functioning as an active member of the world. They prefer that you are just conscious enough to get up in the morning and go to work, but not conscious enough to question anything you are told during your day. To achieve that, all your entertainment is purposely confusing, chaotic, and illogical. Likewise, all your education — whether it is provided by teachers or by media — is also utterly uncentering and confounding. The history you are taught is false and senseless, and current events are manufactured to produce fear and imbalance. It is a miracle any of us can function at all."
  32. http://mileswmathis.com/game.pdf "In short, all this new fiction is coming right out of Langley (he means Langley, Virginia, a metonym for the CIA. The CIA's HQ is located in Langley, Virginia). They just churn it out and then manufacture some bio and photo to front it. It was written by some committee, and it is being shoveled down your throat for two reasons: 1) to waste your time and keep you from looking at more important or interesting things, 2) to further propagandize you. They work in all the current gambits one way or another. [This also applies to The Hunger Games, by the way, and lots of other similar stuff.] They are conditioning you to live in a humorless, joyless world where the bad people are more interesting and the good people always die violently. The only upside is you may get to wear a cool wig. They have to condition you to this entertainment because it is all they are capable of... This is what you would get if Days of Our Lives were set in the 11th century, allowing for the 19 murders and rapes per hour. If you are watching it, turn it off. If you need to veg out, go watch reruns of Match Game on youtube. It will be a total waste of your time, but at least you will avoid a brainwashing, a disempowering, and an un-enlightening."
  33. http://mileswmathis.com/gone.pdf "As an example, the first scene of The Lion King is a baboon with a staff arriving to baptize the new cub. Why would a lion need to be baptized by a baboon? There is something really icky about the idea, though most people seem to have missed it. All the animals are bowing to the lions, or dropping curtsies. Icky again, since I thought we had quit kings and all the bowing to them. So why is it being promoted here? In the next scene, Zazu flies in to scold Scar for not being at the christening. Zazu is supposed to be a hornbill, but looks nothing like one. They have nothing to do with lions in real life. Scar is torturing a mouse, but lions don't eat mice. Scar then tries to eat Zazu, but lions don't eat hornbills either. It is all so Mufasa and his brother Scar can growl at each other. The next scene is a long one with Mufasa lecturing to Simba about how the world works. Just what we need this early in the film right, a long exposition. We soon get to plenty of action, but is only so these sick script writers can steal the worst part of Bambi, having Simba's father Mufasa killed in front of him. To make it worse, the young Simba is told it was his fault. Could anything be more traumatizing to children having to watch this? Bambi was bad enough, but this is a thousand times worse, on purpose. You can now understand why they named the brother Scar. The script writers are intentionally scarring their young audience. And that was scarring, not scaring, though they are doing both, to prepare them for the long PTSD life ahead of them created by the Phoenicians. So the film reads as both a result and a cause of widespread—and one might say generalized—mental illness."
  34. http://mileswmathis.com/michael.pdf "Propaganda has gotten a lot more sophisticated and a lot more prevalent in the past 20 years. The media is now drenched with it. Propaganda is dripping from everything you see or hear... They (the masses) know about propaganda, but don't realize it is hiding everywhere. EVERYWHERE. Even in these innocuous videos about animals. Even in yoga magazines. Even in beer commercials. Even in sporting events. The Phoenicians (the evil Jews) have taken overevery last form of communication and turned it to complete shit. Video, TV, print, literature, poetry, art, education, email, phones, EVERYTHING. Everything is now a total constant mindf$ck, wheedled past your unprotected eyes in order to disorient you, hypnotize you, and ultimately disempower you."
  35. http://mileswmathis.com/onion.pdf
  36. http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html
  37. http://mileswmathis.com/phoen.pdf
  38. http://mileswmathis.com/phoen2.pdf
  39. http://mileswmathis.com/phoen3.pdf
  40. http://mileswmathis.com/phoen4.pdf
  41. http://mileswmathis.com/phoen5.pdf
  42. http://mileswmathis.com/reset.pdf
  43. http://mileswmathis.com/unver.pdf "You have to realize that even in a real event. say a real schoolboard meeting in your hometown, a large number of those around you are hired (CIA) actors... None of those people are real. But even in real events, you will find a large number of CIA actors infiltrating and trying to steer them. These people are everywhere. Intelligence now employees literally millions of people whose jobs are infiltrating eventsand steering them or undermining them."
  44. http://mileswmathis.com/castro.pdf "It is just more indication they think we are all idiots. We don't even merit a well crafted tale, one where the plot holds together. Do you think “real” historians can't see what I see? Do you think thousands of college-educated wonks, as detail-oriented as any scholars, don't know what I have just told you? Of course they know. Anyone who has bothered to read these bios and histories closely must know they are total disinfo. I put it that way because it means that all the historians are in on the con."
  45. http://mileswmathis.com/real.pdf "And that's the problem of the modern world: almost everyone has been hired, directly or indirectly, by the CIA or some front of a front of a front. The artists are propagandists, the scientists are propagandists, the academics in all fields are propagandists, the journalists are propagandists, the historians are propagandists, and so on. I would assume most of them know they are propagandists,and who they are working for, but even if some of them don't, it doesn't matter. Propaganda from dupes reads the same as propaganda from agents, and may be even more convincing."
  46. http://mileswmathis.com/garf.pdf "We have seen that this whole story is another ridiculously transparent fraud, so how is it that no professional historians have ever figured that out? It must be because there are no professional historians. All the paid historians must be from the Families, paid to lie and misdirect. All the history departments at all the universities in the country must be composed of utter frauds. They must know all these stories are false, but they don't care. Either that or they are simply dumb as dirt. I don't see a third choice here."
  47. http://mileswmathis.com/oj.pdf "(There are too many people to maintain the conspiracy) This is the go-to misdirection to this day, for all conspiracy theories. After 911, they used the same misdirection, leading most debunkings with the idea that with so many people involved and so many intangibles, secrecy could never be maintained. That's nonsense, of course, but it fools most people. Most people don't want to believe in faked events, so they are pretty easy to deflect with false reasoning like this. The truth is, secrecy isn't maintained. There are leaks, and many people know the truth. Others find out the truth. But that doesn't matter because total secrecy isn't necessary. All that is necessary is that the leaks aren't reported by the mainstream press. As long as the government and press stonewall anddeny, the majority of people aren't going to move past a certain point. The CIA learned a long time agothat a small percentage of activists can be ignored, because the masses won't follow them. Most people will follow the majority, no matter where it goes. That is why it is called the majority. Because of that, Intelligence only needs to manufacture the majority opinion. In other words, the majority of people don't even need to believe something, they only need to be told that a majority believe it. That is enough to stop them from acting on their own beliefs or suspicions. The government doesn't poll the public to discover a majority opinion, at least not on important topics. The government just creates a majority opinion and publishes it. Most people then believe it—or at least believe it is the majority opinion—simply because they saw it published. Even if they don't share the opinion, they believe they are in a minority, and therefore powerless."
  48. http://milesmathis.com/caven.html
  49. http://mileswmathis.com/nick.pdf
  50. http://mileswmathis.com/blarnia.pdf
  51. http://mileswmathis.com/trump.pdf
  52. http://mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
  53. http://mileswmathis.com/hiller.pdf
  54. 54.0 54.1 http://mileswmathis.com/napoleon.pdf
  55. http://mileswmathis.com/remington.pdf
  56. http://mileswmathis.com/jackboot.pdf
  57. http://milesmathis.com/ratdik.pdf
  58. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Miles_Mathis&diff=1791888&oldid=1791884
  59. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Miles_Mathis&diff=1792165&oldid=1792034
  60. http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Miles_Mathis&diff=1792249&oldid=1792170