|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 21:10, 6 October 2024 diff hist -51 Elon Musk →See also: Musk didn't name the company (which previous version implies). Take it up with Eberhard and Tarpenning.
- 07:42, 19 September 2024 diff hist -8 Elon Musk Undo revision 2677932 by Turtle 4 (talk). It is funny but based on recent legal events, we need to be careful (or the whole article might be gone). He hasn't been convicted of a felony, has he? Tag: Undo
- 22:41, 15 September 2024 diff hist +667 Talk:Life and the global flood →Discussion with pro-flood fellow: The flood story is a fairytale adapted from earlier fairytales by superstitious and ignorant iron-age men. current
- 21:57, 29 May 2024 diff hist +1 m RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Numbers →Numbers Chapter 12: Fixed formatting of previous edit. current
- 21:41, 13 February 2024 diff hist +38 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Job →Job 2:11 Notes: (Nice when Outlook calendars align.) current
- 21:00, 19 November 2023 diff hist +16 But that was the Old Testament Undo revision 2601001 by Edger Halogen (talk) Okay, it does have to do with the text, but it would be better if the "See also" entry was also in the text. Tag: Undo
- 20:58, 19 November 2023 diff hist -16 But that was the Old Testament Undo revision 2600826 by AngelusVastator3456 (talk) Marcionism doesn't appear to have anything to do with the text? Tag: Undo
- 18:09, 19 November 2023 diff hist -76 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Deuteronomy Can't see how the text refers to onanism? current Tag: Undo
- 20:11, 8 November 2023 diff hist +523 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Deuteronomy →Deuteronomy 25:11 Notes: So we have to cut off the hand of a woman who tries to help her husband?!?!?
- 19:59, 8 November 2023 diff hist +456 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Deuteronomy →Deuteronomy 25:9 Notes: Problem solved: Iron-age style.
- 19:48, 8 November 2023 diff hist +236 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Deuteronomy →Deuteronomy 25:5 Notes: Women's rights? Just say: No.
- 21:42, 11 October 2023 diff hist +20 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Romans Reverted since I doubt there's a source supporting the change. Tag: Undo
- 23:31, 14 September 2023 diff hist +199 User talk:Bongolian →Twitter as a source?: Thanks for looking at it. (Your comment was placed in the section above the one in question.)
- 23:28, 14 September 2023 diff hist +411 RationalWiki talk:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 15: Without any indication of things like peer review, how do we know the Tweet isn't an example of a published author simply blowing out a bit of personal steam?
- 22:38, 14 September 2023 diff hist +428 RationalWiki talk:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 15: So as far as you know, the book doesn't support your addition to the article. I've asked a moderator to look at this, so I'll wait and abide by their input.
- 22:26, 14 September 2023 diff hist +204 RationalWiki talk:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 15: Before that, is there any chance you could address the point I made about your book link?
- 22:25, 14 September 2023 diff hist -37 m User talk:Bongolian →Twitter as a source?: Linked to the talk page section of the article in question.
- 22:23, 14 September 2023 diff hist +656 RationalWiki talk:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 15: Either the book you link supports the addition you made to the article, or it doesn't. I vote that we don't start down the route of using Twitter to support the cause of RationalWiki.
- 22:12, 14 September 2023 diff hist +375 User talk:Bongolian →Twitter as a source?: new section
- 22:08, 14 September 2023 diff hist -1 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus Undo revision 2583098 by Ioe bidome (talk). Regardless, do we use Twitter as a source? Take it to the article's talk page please. Tag: Undo
- 21:51, 14 September 2023 diff hist -200 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus "Speculated"? Based on your Twitter post? Tag: Undo
- 08:05, 3 September 2023 diff hist +783 User talk:Edger Halogen →We don't append text explaining the "problems?: Your edits were not directed at the topic of the article. Take it to the article's talk page. current
- 23:02, 2 September 2023 diff hist -209 Qur'anic contradictions We don't append text explaining the "problems Tag: Undo
- 01:33, 28 July 2023 diff hist +129 The Fellowship →External links: Added a link to the 2019 Netflix series "The Family".
- 03:37, 30 June 2023 diff hist +3 m Anti-vaccination movement →Convincing people to vaccinate: Added "to".
- 19:17, 26 June 2023 diff hist -83 Answers in Genesis Undo revision 2557886 by Deyab81791 (talk). The whole article is a "description of the organization". It isn't a means to advertise Zaubee. Tag: Undo
- 20:10, 20 June 2023 diff hist +895 m User:Rabbitseatcarrots Reverted edits by 12.139.58.53 (talk) to last revision by Edger Halogen Tag: Rollback
- 20:07, 20 June 2023 diff hist +581 m User:Rabbitseatcarrots Reverted edits by 12.139.58.53 (talk) to last revision by Edger Halogen Tag: Rollback
- 20:02, 20 June 2023 diff hist +447 m User:Rabbitseatcarrots Reverted edits by 12.139.58.53 (talk) to last revision by Rabbitseatcarrots Tag: Rollback
- 05:48, 11 April 2023 diff hist -2 m RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Luke →Luke 23:45 Notes: "there" -> "then", "experimented" -> "experienced".
- 06:30, 24 March 2023 diff hist +412 User talk:Bongolian →Donald Trump child rape cases Gallery section: It is evidence of nothing more than that they met. Apologies Bongolian.
- 04:36, 24 March 2023 diff hist -491 User talk:Bongolian Undo revision 2535726 by Enix150 (talk). Bongolian, please revert my deletion if you feel the need to comment on this rubbish. Tag: Undo
- 18:56, 28 February 2023 diff hist +139 Qur'anic scientific errors →Moon split in two: Rewrote to match reference. It wasn't formed from a graben; it "exhibits a well-developed graben".
- 20:07, 27 February 2023 diff hist +678 Talk:Qur'anic scientific errors →Read before reverting: Your edits changed the section heading from "formed after Earth" to "protect Earth" which is a change in semantics not covered by the existing text in the section. current
- 19:57, 27 February 2023 diff hist +250 Talk:Qur'anic contradictions →Creation of man: Then write some (brief) explanatory notes next to the established points in the article. E.g. "This was for adam", "This was for non-adam", etc.
- 08:40, 27 February 2023 diff hist +101 m Talk:Qur'anic contradictions →Creation of man: (Forgot to sign.)
- 08:39, 27 February 2023 diff hist +402 Talk:Qur'anic contradictions →Creation of man: The section is called "What were humans created from?", so don't delete things that provide information to others determining whatever the hell it is that the book of fables is supposedly saying.
- 08:35, 27 February 2023 diff hist -450 User talk:Edger Halogen Undo revision 2530182 by GreenlandGneiss (talk). Unfortunately, I read them. This will be addressed on the article's talk page; not here. Tag: Undo
- 21:23, 26 February 2023 diff hist -1,229 m Qur'anic scientific errors Reverted edits by GreenlandGneiss (talk) to last revision by 2405:201:4005:595C:34BD:53EA:505F:C20D Tag: Rollback
- 21:13, 26 February 2023 diff hist +923 Qur'anic contradictions Undo revision 2529984 by GreenlandGneiss (talk). Not sure what "Adam" has to do with it? The section is just presenting the various literal creation versions. Such a wholesale change should be discussed first (Talk page please). Tag: Undo
- 08:37, 25 February 2023 diff hist +55 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 32:16 Notes: Right … that aught to keep any unbelievers in line.
- 08:36, 25 February 2023 diff hist +469 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 32:15 Notes: Okay, so this is really interesting. Let's say that you were the omniscient creator of the universe; would you allow your spoken word for the rest of Earthly eternity to be carried down the mountain by a single person who might deliver it unto a bunch of unbelieving rabble? Or would you find a better means to deliver it to the entire population of the one planet that you decided was worthy of attention out of the tens of trillions of planets you recently created?
- 08:26, 25 February 2023 diff hist +153 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 32:13 Notes: And even though I have created trillions of galaxies I will promote nothing to those on Earth outside of a radius of 750km centered on the Middle East.
- 08:20, 25 February 2023 diff hist +105 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 32:8 Notes: Yeah, this is reminiscent of the "Holywood" script that unrealistically elevates the negative position.
- 08:14, 25 February 2023 diff hist +344 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 32:7 Notes: Re. "have corrupted themselves", has anyone else every felt that they've "corrupted" themselves on a Friday? It's interesting that the buy-bull doesn't define what "corrupt" means. Is that drinking more that the number of standard drinks as defined by their government regulations, or does that mean visiting the local massage parlour?
- 08:08, 25 February 2023 diff hist +71 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 32:6 Notes: Re. "and rose up to play", FFS, it might have been a Friday…
- 08:06, 25 February 2023 diff hist +103 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 32:3 Notes: In typical Holywood fashion, it's important to develop a villan (no matter how bewilderingly stupid).
- 08:02, 25 February 2023 diff hist +174 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 31:17 Notes: Oh, okay, you're not following the sabbath rules because you're not one of the "children of Israel"? So are you covered under the rest of the buy-bull or aren't you?
- 07:59, 25 February 2023 diff hist +495 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 31:16 Notes: We now have a problem biblical literalists. Exactly how do you work with "a perpetual covenant" defining your controlling sabbath?
- 07:50, 25 February 2023 diff hist +336 RationalWiki:Annotated Bible/Exodus →Exodus 31:15 Notes: Wait a moment: fair cop about the "cut off from among his people" edict (I was okay with that), but now you've ramped it up to "be put to death" in the very next verse? BTW, what's with the qualifier "surely"? Isn't the omniscient creator of the universe certain about the outcome of doing "work" on the (black) sabbath?