RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $1800Goal: $3000

User talk:Allhailtuna

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Allhailtuna!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

WELCOME Susan Jayne Garlicktalk 13:01, 7 September 2007 (CDT)
Hi, and welcome! You might want to read the guidelines link above to familiarize yourself with what we are doing here (we aren't just an opne wiki looking for any content whatsoever), and maybe you will find a niche (or a huge role) here, and know when what you want to write should go in teh fun: namespace. The help files (linked in the top left menu) are also a font of wisdom, thanks to SJG. humanbe in 13:53, 7 September 2007 (CDT)
A couple quick suggestions...
  • Making links - open the "all pages" list to see exactly how the article might be named. Or if it already exists in some form, of course. The same goes for categories.
  • Capital letters - don't capitalize words just because they are "important". Only capitalize first letters fo sentences and proper nouns.
Just a few random comments to help you make better articles/article improvements. Thanks! humanbe in 14:48, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Hi again! Hope you don't mind but I've mved your seminal work on Bad Religion to fun:Bad_Religion the concencus was that it just wasn't our mainstream material. The guy himself sounds as if he might be worth an article for his beliefs if noyt for his music. I've never heard of him or the group but everyone to their own. SG 16:01, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Put something in your user page, please. You come up red all over recent pages & it hurts my eyes. Thanks. SG 16:07, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

The article deserved it, I suppose. Thanks. Just wondering, though, how come there's an article on John Lennon?

Dunno. Anyone? SG

Revisionism is awesome. It's like going back into the future and tripping people up in important moments of their lives. -Sρΐяαl.Дгсђıτέςτstand up and shout 09:27, 4 September 2008 (EDT)

Thanks. Oh & sign your talk page comments with 4 tildes please: ~~~~ SG 16:16, 7 September 2007 (CDT)

Babel[edit]

Careful, you'll have Taiwan Boi after you demanding to know the strength of bronze age bricks! The mere fact that something's patently ridiculous ... Aah I give up. (see global flood talk) SG 09:43, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

I don't see how the strength of bronze age bricks would justify a tower reaching out of Earth's atmosphere and further than any satellites. - All Hail Tuna 09:47, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

No but that's the sort of argument that TB brings up. Twas facetious - I don't see how the words of prehistoric (almost) priest classes can be examined and taken for truth by some people. SG 09:57, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

Really? Eek... Well, technically, that is invalid, as the burden of proof is on those who believe in the Tower of Babel theory, and thus the strength of Bronze Age bricks must be found to be capable of making such a strong tower, Babylonians must be found to have invented space suits, etc. Otherwise, it can safely be assumed that Babylonian bricks were not stronger than metal, etc, or modern bricks, as it would generally be quite widespread knowledge if they were found to be so. Denying this would take the 'Flat Earth Society' approach, they actually could be, but were withheld as part of some random conspiracy theory. - All Hail Tuna 10:16, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

Hi[edit]

Long time, no hear! SusanG  ContribsTalk 10:47, 20 April 2008 (EDT)

Hi. I didn't generally have the time to come one because of exams, trekking in Nepal and stuff. It was annoying (Especially the trekking, I was ill half the time), but now I should be able to stay a bit more active here. Anyways, has anything important happened while I've been gone? -All Hail Tuna 10:56, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
There was a revolution, the cabal that founded the wiki was overthrown, and now we seek to demonstrate the inherent scientific basis of Induhlligent Duhsign and the moral supremacy of Conservative ideals on all our articles. Godspeed ;) humanUser talk:Human 13:15, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
Does that mean that you took away all of our goats? :( -All Hail Tuna 04:53, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
I think they rounded up all the goats and put them in a small corral, and feed them only scraps of old sneakers. We are planning a counter-revolution, however, and when victory is ours, as it surely must be, the goats will be liberated and the people will join in a resounding chorus of cluelessness. The revolution will not be energized, so bring your own pitchfork, by the way. humanUser talk:Human 12:33, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
That sounds like fun! Wheee! Still, it is a bit scary, what if they bash us all on the head with a giant Bible? -All Hail Tuna 11:41, 22 April 2008 (EDT)

Saying "Hi"[edit]

What's wrong with sturgeon? --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:50, 25 April 2008 (EDT)

Ninety percent of everything is crap. -All Hail Tuna 01:02, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
Well, really, only about 5% or so of most critters is crap at any given moment (depending on whether measured pre-poop or post-pooping), right? humanUser talk:Human 01:40, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
If you believe that, I am 95 percent sure that you are against brainwashing in the classrooms, and have a disturbing amount of faith in science. -All Hail Tuna 02:31, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
Can I call you the sturgeon general?  : ) --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:51, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
If necessary. As long as you say it without liberal bias. Satanspeed. \m/ -All Hail Tuna 06:46, 1 May 2008 (EDT)

Since no one else seems to be here right now...[edit]

You'll have to do.  : )

I'm not sure what to do about recent IP 24.175.66.89's changes to the Evidence against a recent creation article. I'm torn between reverting his clearly pro-creationist edits and being über-tolerant towards it. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:15, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

It's not relevant to the article anyways. And as Ed says, you should always try to remove bias, rather than adding to it, as this dude's done. -The Almighty Tuna 05:06, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
I've reverted: it was pro-recent creation - see her/his user talk page SusanG  ContribsTalk 05:08, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
That was quite obvious. There's nothing wrong with YEC edits, but they never seem to present the infinite proof for YEC that is hidden away in a Bible passage only visible to Prophets. -The Almighty Tuna 05:12, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
Alrighty, then. I'll just revert edits like that from now on. Just wanted to check and see if it would be heavy-handed. Thank you for your assurances. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 16:45, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
I actually only said that because I had become desensitized due to violent video games, and am thus proceeding on a huge rampage to kill all conservatives because the game taught me to. -The Almighty Tuna 02:40, 4 May 2008 (EDT)

I've had it up to here with vandals. Proxima Centauri 09:18, 5 May 2008 (EDT)

We need to release our inner liberal and purge them all. -The Almighty Tuna 09:22, 5 May 2008 (EDT)

Somehow,[edit]

I don't exactly think that this will help matters all that much. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום

Fair enough, I just got annoyed after reading that. It's in the memory hole now, though. ------ ------ ------ The Almighty Tuna 08:58, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

thanks[edit]

for the proofreading. Somedays i get on a roll and good usage seems to just roll out the door. Carptrash 11:14, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Hashmark[edit]

Good job on the reverts! What an odd series of wandalism. He's marked now, so he can't cause much more trouble now. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 00:59, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Thanks. I'm guessing his edits were supposed to be funny somehow. I mean, 'crap circles'? Genius. -Sρΐяαl.Дгсђıτέςτstand up and shout 01:04, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh yes, comedy gold. I was a little afraid to do any research on "numberwang," but apparently it's a sketch from a British TV show. Weird. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 01:11, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
You haven't heard of Numberwang??
Dear God. You poor souls. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 01:27, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
You're a mowse. -Sρΐяαl.Дгсђıτέςτstand up and shout 01:29, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
I am indeed a mowse ^_^ You are a tuna, presumably. Or possibly an architect. New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 01:35, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
I am a Tunaist that worships at the Metal Church. It's an unholy church, and you shall be the sacrifice. -Sρΐяαl.Дгсђıτέςτstand up and shout 01:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
But first you must catch me! Digger. Listener. Runner. Prince with a swift warren! Be cunning and your people will never be destroyed!
....
But anyway, is it me or was your original "you're a mowse" comment a perfect example of this theorem? New3.pngPink(Astronomy Domine) 01:49, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
I was afraid that nobody would have noticed that. Now we can make a page on Conservapedia about it and cite this as evidence! (It's more trustworthy than most of their sources for other articles, at least). -Sρΐяαl.Дгсђıτέςτstand up and shout 02:10, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

I thought some of that vandalism amusing, but not worth archiving. Anyway, on tot he next topic... ħumanUser talk:Human 02:21, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Demotion[edit]

Lest ye shall find yourself fending off the superstitious villagers again with nothing more than a limp strand of spaghetti, I demoted you to sysop. There's a new sysop guide somewhere in the help files if you're curious, you might want to check it out. Now you can click "block this idiot", but then what we do is click on "move to vandal group" from there. Editors in the vandal group can only make two edits an hour, so they get bored really fast. My condolences! ħumanUser talk:Human 02:21, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Congratz! Now get to work. - Icewedge (*bleet*) 02:44, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
Thanks. Also, can I block people for not respecting my authority? -Sρΐяαl.Дгсђıτέςτstand up and shout 02:47, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
Hehe, only if you can get a sysopric on Konswervopydia. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:49, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
What authority lowly janitor? Dominion over the mops? impressive. - Icewedge (*bleet*) 02:50, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
Yeah. -Sρΐяαl.Дгсђıτέςτstand up and shout 03:00, 7 September 2008 (EDT)

Anarchy[edit]

Great work :)--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 07:42, 2 November 2008 (EST)