User talk:Ha

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Ha! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Something funny? Ace^X-102 20:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I find this site to be very funny. I suspect it is a parody site. Ha (talk) 20:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Parody? Parody of what? Ace^X-102 20:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

A parody of liberalism and atheism, obviously. The first rule of all parody sites is to deny being a parody site, after all. Ha (talk) 21:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Ah, if it's parody you're after, may I recommend this site. --PsyGremlinTal! 21:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

The talkpage is not your page and the comment above contains no slander or personal attack. Please leave it alone. Ace^X-102 22:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

You are typically deceitful. The comment above is slander against a virtuous site. You should be ashamed of yourself. I have compromised to allow the comment to remain. Please be reasonable, that is all I ask. Ha (talk) 22:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

You're trying too hard. tmtoulouse 22:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Your personal opinion on the "virtuous" site is at odds with the mission of this website unfortunately. Maybe you should instead join the website itself instead of trolling attempting to change our minds. Ace^X-102 22:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I fixed that French guy's spelling.

It's obvious that this site is a parody site.

It's embarrassing. Ha (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I fixed this troll's spelling and grammar. It's obvious this user is a parody user. It's embarrassing. --GastonRabbit (talk) 22:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

So, why don't you wander over to the "virtuous" site and see how long your brethren keep you around. Oh yes, and the word you want is "libel". Slander refers to spoken words only. Oh yes, if you read their "liberal style" article you'll fine #41 - "often declare that an adversary should be "ashamed of himself," I guess you flunk their test. Still, at least we don't block you, just because we disagree with you. --PsyGremlinSnakk! 23:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Why are you so full of hate?

Your deceitful propaganda is unpersuasive. Ha (talk) 23:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

My dear boy, I wasn't trying to persuade you about anything. Besides, one needs an open mind for such things to be effective. Merely help you along with your accusations. Plus it's fun to keep poking you. Oh hate? let's see, you waltz in here and start moaning about deceit and crap sense of humour and idiots, but we're the ones full of hate. Like I said, you;re still very welcome to edit here. But try calling somebody on CP an idiot and see how long you last. Or would blocking you until the entropy death of the universe be virtuous? --PsyGremlinKhuluma! 23:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

"Ha", looks like we've stumbled into another example of the liberal double standard: call something subjective when you don't like it, but call something objective when you do. I've managed to read your rants and your use of "BCE" and "CE" denies historical basis, so regardless, I'm so confident that you're committed to censoring the Bible. I urge you, I beseech you, I beg you: accept that creationism helps resist language devolution. In sum, "Conservapedian" is an honorary title. Once someone buys into evolution, he typically refuses to learns anything about the Bible again, despite its undisputed role as the most influential book. Go back to Wikipedia.--Andy Schlafly 13:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

^ Scares the hell outa me everytime I see it, as for slightly less than a second, I think that Andy has actually invaded RW. Then I remember it's just a sane person imitating him. ~SuperHamster Talk 00:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

I find it amusing to be blocked.

I can only suppose that the defences of the bigots above of me were rubbish.

They claimed I would not be blocked for my opinions.

Now look.

Ha. Ha (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Dude. You were blocked for 10 minutes. For being a troll. Don't be a troll, or continue in.. 4 minutes. Quaru (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Offer your explanation.

I was given certain guarantees.

Now I know those guarantees aren't worth the paper they are written on.

I find it amusing you call your critics 'trolls'.

Very intellectual of you.

Typical deceitful Liberal consumed by hate.

Our day will come.

The good people of America will never allow you and your President to introduce your hate agenda.

Go back to smoking your tree hippy.

Its obvious what you're game is and you're not willing to accept debate or criticism. Ha (talk) 23:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh! It's Rob. How's it going? IQ still lingering around 57? DickTurpis (talk) 23:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

You haven't been blocked for your opinions. Learn to read. But since that isn't your strong point, I'll just do it for you:

   * (show/hide) 23:03, 16 July 2010 Ace McWicked (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Ha (Talk  | contribs) with an expiry time of 10 minutes (autoblock disabled) ‎ (boring troll) (unblock | change block)
   * (show/hide) 22:38, 15 July 2010 GastonRabbit (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Ha (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 314 sec. (5 minutes) (autoblock disabled, cannot edit own talk page) ‎ (Feeding the Troll) (unblock | change block)
   * (show/hide) 21:34, 15 July 2010 Ace McWicked (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Ha (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 314 sec. (5 minutes) (autoblock disabled) ‎ (chill out buddy) (unblock | change block)

Let's see... two five minute blocks, the first one because you needed to chill out, a second by me just because I was bored (the reason was "feeding the troll"... yeah, I didn't intend for that to be taken any more seriously than the blocks I've gotten by other bored RationalWiki users), and the ten-minute block because you're a boring troll. (Let's face it, you just sound like a generic Conservapedia user. Just stuff about deceitful liberals this and conservatives that, and crap like that; nothing new. Try a little harder and maybe you'll be less boring and more original.) --GastonRabbit (talk) 00:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

I do not understand why I have spawned such hatred.

Liberals are nothing without their consuming sense of hatred.

Atheists too.

Shame. Ha (talk) 09:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

You still sound like a generic Conservapedia user (also, 1. Even though I am liberal I'm not particularly into politics 2. My post was made because of boredom, not hatred 3. I'm agnostic.). Try harder next time. --GastonRabbit (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Liberal Censorship

Now I've been blocked again.

Liberals are so vacuous.

So mean spirited.

So authoritarian.

So evil.

So black in heart.

So dirty.

So filthy.

So amoral.

Amen. Ha (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

So are you a liberal pretending to be conservative or a conservative pretending to be a liberal pretending to be conservative?--Brendiggg (talk) 12:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Are you an atheist pretending to be a Stalinist?

Or a Stalinist pretending to be an atheist?

Or an atheist pretending to be a fascist?

Or a fascist pretending to be an atheist?

Or a Liberal devoid of reasoning abilities? Ha (talk) 12:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Why am I banned?

It is completely wrong

to ban me

merely for voicing my strong opinions.

You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Unban me now fascists. 86.40.105.186 (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Damn it. Just outed myself. I suppose you already knew who this was anyway... 86.40.105.186 (talk) 13:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh hello MC. Also, you'll note that your ban was for 30 minutes and ran out some time ago. And Eira was wrong to block you, but don't worry, I've dragged him behind the woodshed and given him a jolly good seeing to. --PsyGremlinPraat! 13:19, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

(EC) It was bloody obvious from the moment you registered the name.  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 13:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Lies. You had no idea who this was. I defeated you all with my awesome intellect. 86.40.105.186 (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

In fact, we still don't have any idea who it is. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 14:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Until you start posting your rants in haiki or tanka style, I'll have to take your claims of awesomeness under advisement. We don't stand for unfounded claims of expertise here. --PsyGremlin講話 14:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC)