There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Because of your edits to and the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions,
bleat ask away.
We hope you enjoy your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ — and these external tools:
- Rbutr shows user-submitted rebuttals to your current webpage.
- Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
- web.archive.org and archive.is can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again! Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 13:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I gotta ask:
- Hard question. Well, first of all, my generic view "I don't know enough to have a fixed view" applies, because I'm not a near-east expert, so I could be wrong and change my opinion whenever I encouter better points. But besides that, I would say "It's complicated." How exact do you want it? Short version? Both sides have done bad things, but if I had to pick a side, I would pick the side that doesn't consist of genocidal antisemites. I understand that the whole situation started in an unfortunate way (but way more complicated than the simplified "Jews came out of nowhere and took the land" nonsense - Jews had been living there already and were suffering from antisemitism, long before the founding of modern Israel). I might be wrong here, but at the moment, it looks to me that there is one bully who is (fortunately) really incompetent and too weak to succeed in completely destroying Israel. Of course Israel did bad things and I don't try to apologize it, but that doesn't make both sides equally bad. If I had to chose, I would side with Israel, because while they are far from perfect, they are still a magnitude better than their enemies. They are the best equivalent to a modern, democratic state that there is in this region.--Irian (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Short form answer: I agree with you on most points... Long form answer when I got more time... Also, do you happen to know Stephan Grigat (the university guy, not the other one) He has written a bunch of books on the subject and tours the German speaking countries with lectures on his books... He raises some interesting points, also related to history... Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 20:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)