There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:P. Wormer
- David Gerard (talk) 16:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Ormus[edit]
Oh, good Lord. Spectacular crankery, and you must feel dumber after attempting to write about it - David Gerard (talk) 15:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
t3h h0rr0r, t3h h0rr0r[edit]
I'm afraid you've shown flagrant good sense and exquisite snark in public, where everyone can see. But we know how to deal with that sort of behaviour - David Gerard (talk) 08:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Monoatomic gold[edit]
Well, it must be good stuff, 'cos David Icke says so - David Gerard (talk) 16:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Evening[edit]
Didn't know you were here. (Fred A.)--Colonel Sanders (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
IP information[edit]
Although it is probably very easy to obtain, I think we'd all prefer if you didn't go around indicating where an editor is editing from, or even if they are using a proxy to hide their identity. It's just the way we roll here. Cheers. --DamoHi 07:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Homeopathy[edit]
If this crank can't find his way into a journal more scientific than the Times of India, you probably shouldn't cite his research as truth and goodness. PacWalker 12:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Apologies. I seem to have (a) missed the joke and (b) been rather rude about it. I guess I am now that guy that every wiki has. I shall try not to be so very hasty again. PacWalker 09:43, 7 April 2015 (UTC)