User talk:ResurrectingDeadLinks

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, ResurrectingDeadLinks!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Autopatrolled[edit]

I guess you may be the BoN who was blocked by a filter before. Since you immediately ran into an edit filter preventing your first edits (I inserted it) along the lines of your username for this account...

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:

--ApooftGnegiol (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Unblocked again[edit]

I didn't think our latest (and flawed) edit filters would be this aggressive, but, well... Unblocked you, put in your last edit. I'm changing these new filters so such things won't happen, hopefully. --ApooftGnegiol (talk) 15:20, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

A thousand apologies...[edit]

...for deleting your user page on accident.-Flandres (talk) 01:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

How!?!?![edit]

How does someones user page get deleted ON ACCIDENT? Yes, I do believe you, BUT HOW? Did you mistake me for a known spammer...? — Unsigned, by: ResurrectingDeadLinks / talk / contribs


The logs show your page deleted and restored just after it got vandalized, while a vandal was creating lots of pages including userpages. The vandal is likely the same anon user who left the charming message above. --ApooftGnegiol (talk) 00:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

archive.is, archive.ph, etc.[edit]

I see that you've been changing archive.ph to archive.is on several pages. Although for all intents and purposes, the two websites appear to be mirrors. There is a difference however in that archive.is periodically fails for me, but archive.ph has not yet. I found that deleting cookies for archive.is seems to fix the problem, at least temporarily. Bongolian (talk) 22:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I was changing it because of Archive.is not working for me. I would rather have a permenant solution than a solution that only temporarily works. I am doing this so if anyone else who wants to read the article with the sources (including me) then they can have working links. I apologize if I am saying something wrong. I just want the best for the people reading them. - User:ResurrectingDeadLinks
I was not trying to correct what you have been doing, but rather to add some clarification with my own experience. Bongolian (talk) 23:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Ohhhhhhhh. Ok. Also, what RW article should get their links/references archived next?

Notice of demotion[edit]

Antares (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2025 (UTC)