User talk:Rodlen

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Rodlen!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Hiya. rational ghey (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Good to see a nice welcome. Rodlen (talk) 18:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Quieted down?[edit]

Sounds very odd to me. What's wrong with 'quieten'? Ro Thorpe (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Huh. I find "quietened down" sounds odder, but then again, I'm an odd person. The "of course" just felt like it didn't belong, though. Rodlen (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Must be a British/American thing. Ro Thorpe (talk) 21:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Canadian English being a weird conglomeration of British and American English, probably. Rodlen (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
You & User:Human are Canadians? Ro Thorpe (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I don't know about Human, but I am. Rodlen (talk) 21:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm 90% sure that Human is from the northeastern US. Tetronian you're clueless 21:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Yes, that, but I was infected with Britishness when young. There's probably a better word than either quieted or quietened though. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

In light of your good contribs here and help against vandals, you have been made a sysop. Here's your mop and bucket. The Spikey Punk I'm punking my punk! 23:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Awesome. Thanks. Rodlen (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

CP:The closet[edit]

Even if they block you, it's best not to 'come out' on here right away, as they are more likely to revert your work if they know you are a member of RW. DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 08:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Aye. I will try to remember that next time I get caught. Rodlen (talk) 22:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Godspeed!!![edit]

"Anonymous User" (your chosen name is obviously unacceptable), you're not fooling anyone. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and see you're suffering from evolution syndrome, so admit it, you're insane from San Francisco values. You also clearly deny that Obama refuses to salute the flag and that including the phrase "under God" in The Pledge of Allegiance helps resist Shaken Baby Syndrome. I repeat: Conservapedia has 84 million in page views, and 0 in mental problems by its contributors. We don't have overly broad policies of censorship here on Conservapedia. Our rules are specific and their application is clear and almost never disputable. We've had liberal editors and even Administrators since the beginning and I can't think of a single editor who was censored for his ideas, rather than violating specific and incontestable rules. The rules are clear: don't emasculate Christianity, don't dumb down the Bible, don't pretend Hell doesn't exist, accept the full logic of the Bible and use the powerful new words that come into the English language.--aschlafly 22:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Punky Your mental puke relief 06:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

"Anonymous User" (your chosen name is obviously unacceptable), you're not fooling anyone. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and see you're suffering from evolution syndrome, so admit it, you're insane from San Francisco values. You also clearly deny that Obama refuses to salute the flag and that including the phrase "under God" in The Pledge of Allegiance helps resist Shaken Baby Syndrome. I repeat: Conservapedia has 84 million in page views, and 0 in mental problems by its contributors. We don't have overly broad policies of censorship here on Conservapedia. Our rules are specific and their application is clear and almost never disputable. We've had liberal editors and even Administrators since the beginning and I can't think of a single editor who was censored for his ideas, rather than violating specific and incontestable rules. The rules are clear: don't emasculate Christianity, don't dumb down the Bible, don't pretend Hell doesn't exist, accept the full logic of the Bible and use the powerful new words that come into the English language.--aschlafly 22:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Rodlen (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Gentlemen! I will bake your precious diet coke, enabling me to destroy atheism on the internet. You should all be reconstructing over Operation number, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Gentlemen, behold!

It appears to be likely that your yelps are completely indicative of an obsessiveness with Conservapedia. Concerning evolutionism and web traffic, I would also point out that If you could face this unpleasant reality in your article on your website about yourselves, I will be impressed. However, I do not expect to be impressed lest I allow you to disappoint me. In fact, by the first quarter of the calendar year of 2013, it is likely Atheism will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Underwater Porticos is gathering steam!!! I think such occurrences have a likelihood of occurring

Sincerely,

Conservative Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 06:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)