User talk:Rodlen

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Rodlen!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Welcome to the Dollhouse! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Hiya. rational ghey (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Good to see a nice welcome. Rodlen (talk) 18:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Quieted down?[edit]

Sounds very odd to me. What's wrong with 'quieten'? Ro Thorpe (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Huh. I find "quietened down" sounds odder, but then again, I'm an odd person. The "of course" just felt like it didn't belong, though. Rodlen (talk) 20:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Must be a British/American thing. Ro Thorpe (talk) 21:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Canadian English being a weird conglomeration of British and American English, probably. Rodlen (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
You & User:Human are Canadians? Ro Thorpe (talk) 21:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I don't know about Human, but I am. Rodlen (talk) 21:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm 90% sure that Human is from the northeastern US. Tetronian you're clueless 21:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Yes, that, but I was infected with Britishness when young. There's probably a better word than either quieted or quietened though. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

In light of your good contribs here and help against vandals, you have been made a sysop. Here's your mop and bucket. The Goonie Punk Can't sleep, clowns will eat me! 23:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Awesome. Thanks. Rodlen (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

CP:The closet[edit]

Even if they block you, it's best not to 'come out' on here right away, as they are more likely to revert your work if they know you are a member of RW. DeltaStarSenior SysopSpeciationspeed! 08:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Aye. I will try to remember that next time I get caught. Rodlen (talk) 22:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Godspeed!!![edit]

"Anonymous User" (inappropriate name), your posting is filled with gross misspellings, "I don't get it" type of statements, and a general link that shows nothing. I looked at many of your edits before reverting them and I did reflect on how your 'experts' perceive American conservatives, and I've concluded they are clueless, so regardless, I'm so confident that you're a second generation atheist. Like all liberals, you deny that action at a distance prevents depression. I repeat: Lenski, PNAS editors and television producers have free will to reject or ignore the truth, and I'm more interested in getting the truth out here than trying to persuade someone in dying media like print or television. If you find the math in relativity fun, great, but relativity is not going to help anyone. It never has. Pick up a Bible in between some equations. I urge you to open your mind and set it free. You'll be amazed by how much better your life becomes as a result.--Aschlafly 06:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC) Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 06:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

"Anonymous User" (inappropriate name), your posting is filled with gross misspellings, "I don't get it" type of statements, and a general link that shows nothing. I looked at many of your edits before reverting them and I did reflect on how your 'experts' perceive American conservatives, and I've concluded they are clueless, so regardless, I'm so confident that you're a second generation atheist. Like all liberals, you deny that action at a distance prevents depression. I repeat: Lenski, PNAS editors and television producers have free will to reject or ignore the truth, and I'm more interested in getting the truth out here than trying to persuade someone in dying media like print or television. If you find the math in relativity fun, great, but relativity is not going to help anyone. It never has. Pick up a Bible in between some equations. I urge you to open your mind and set it free. You'll be amazed by how much better your life becomes as a result.--Aschlafly 06:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC) Rodlen (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Wigocp.svg This Conservapedia-related article is of largely historical interest and is no longer the focus of RationalWiki today.
Conservapedia (and religious fundamentalism to an extent) was a major focal point in the early history of RationalWiki, but long ago ceased coming up with new ways to appall and amuse.
Our energies are now spent debunking other, fresher examples of pseudoscientific claims, authoritarianism, and deceit.
For RationalWiki's less ancient content, try the Best of RationalWiki.


Gentlemen! I will vomit your precious nitrogen, enabling me to destroy Richard Dawkins on the internet. You should all be adhering over Operation earlobe, which will likely give Conservapedia a top result on a certain search engine starting with G.

Gentlemen at an atheist website,

I found your comments in regards to the death of Darwinism on the internet are slightly irrational. As pointed out by Popular Christian YouTuber Shockofgod, liberalism and deception, you ignore the fact that some of the most violent homicides are among homosexuals. In fact, by the end of the month, it is likely Obesity will have lost all vestiges of credibility. :) :) :)

Rest assured, Operation Rentboys is gathering steam!!! Perhaps, if you agree to the debate, the Hispanic ladies might finally believe you have machismo... Sincerely,

A user of the Conservative account The Goonie 1 What's this button do? Uh oh.... 06:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)