There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Scribbinus
Yisfidri (talk) 01:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrolled[edit]
Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.
We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:
- Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
- web.archive.org and archive.today, among other tools, can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again!
--Cosmikdebris (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
sysop tools[edit]
Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, wizard Sysop has been added to your user rights. Feel free to let your newfound POWER course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, bleat ask away.
EK (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Julie Burchill[edit]
You added a sentence that begins, "It about her experience". I can't figure out what you meant, or I'd fix it. Dave Wise (talk) 16:20, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- I tried to fix it, but, yeah, I can't tell what it was supposed to be, either. DerFluchtPlan (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- ”It about her experience” was pretty obviously “it was about her experience”. I’m sorry neither of you could figure out that extremely obvious typo. Scribbinus (talk) 21:22, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, you wrote it so, of course it was obvious to you. We didn't and couldn't. That's all. No biggie. Notice, though, neither of us just reverted it. No insult intended, but, as we've now demonstrated, written language isn't always unambiguous. Enjoy! DerFluchtPlan (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)