RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Anglo-Saxon Foundation

Anglo-Saxon Foundation | Result: Keep. But it needs updating.

Anglo-Saxon Foundation (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. This article describes a website that has been dead for ages now. It's no longer relevant. — Oxyaena ^Harass 04:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

There's lots of pages on no-longer-existing organisations, whether fascist, communist, or just plain weird. So I don't think an organisation (or their website) being dead is in itself reason for deletion. --Annanoon (talk) 10:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Keep

1. People spent a lot of time making this extensive article. It might be useful for someone at some later date. Besides they were pissed at us. Bongolian (talk) 05:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
2. Things do not simply become irrelevant. This is a perfectly good article. — Dysk (contribs) 08:59, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
3. Change to past tense then. Historical content is fine. And these sort of people tend to come back - David Gerard (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
4. Agreed, past tense. We must study the past if we wish to avoid repeating it. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 16:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
5. Yup, revise to past tense and keep as it is well written and cited. These ideas have not disappeared and I would be surprised if this site doesn’t “reincarnate” under a new name with similar contents and overlapping authors/contributors (that’s a well worn pattern on both the radical left and right; cf. Monty Python’s Judean People’s Front in Life of Brian. ScepticWombat (talk) 23:41, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
6. We should also add a section on the site's shutdown, and circumstances thereof. Prototype Mad Scientist (talk) 22:55, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
7. kep DuceMoosolini^{Your friendly RW dictator moderator} 15:42, 26 July 2019 (UTC)