Information icon.svg Our Community Standards are under review. Your comments and inputs are welcome on the relevant project talkpage.


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This Drink related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


Suggest merge with Fun:Beer.--Bobbing up 14:54, 2 September 2008 (EDT)

I only wrote it because I was bored so do as thou wilt, but either remove/change the links to here or keep the redirect to fun:, to stop it appearing in wanted pages. Totnesmartin 18:48, 2 September 2008 (EDT)


Lambics don't taste of fruit, fruit is added to lambics (and geuzes) to make fruit beers. Lambics themselves have a slightly sour taste which I kinda like — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs sometime in late October, 2010.


Why?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 03:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Feel free to change, I'm off to bed in a few. Tytalk 03:09, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

MIssion??? Why is this on Mission?[edit]

Oh, right, cause we are all a bunch of lushes. Nevermind.  ;-) Pink mowse.pngGodotGrow a vagina 16:49, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

RW owes its very existence to beer. Tmtoulouse (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
If you ask Ty, it appears "Chicken Wings" are equally important, though I'm rather with our dear Toast, that Cheese and Chocolate are the fuel of good witticisms. Pink mowse.pngGodotGrow a vagina 17:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Chicken wings and caffeine, moving towards mixed drinks and brandy in the evening. ТyComplaints 17:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Personally, I think this should be merged into the funspace article. Same goes for wine & cider. I don't see muvh mainspace value in them & they're already sort-of covered in the relevant sections of the alcohol article. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 15:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm in two minds about this now. Some of the more whimsical articles in mainspace, like this one, have been around for years. Another example is goat. They exist because they are part of our history - I propose a grandfathered-in protection clause for the whimsical ones.--Bob"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." 15:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm in two minds as well, and think some of the more popular of our frivolous articles (e.g. goat, cat) should be kept around in main. But the more stuff we keep like this, the more odd it will look to new editors, so we should try to keep grandfathered-in stuff to a minimum. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 16:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I say this article should be merged into funspace because it lacks on mission content and we should keep grandfathered-in stuff to a minimum - only the best stuff like Goat should be kept. Onion Hi! :) 16:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I agree. Much of the "old stuff" that has been around for years that I read in the CP clean up just makes me think that many of the early editors were a bunch of drooling ED/Uncyclopedia rejects. CopperheadHisssssss 19:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh fuck off, this wiki was written by drunks before you were old enough to vote. And screw the CP stuff, that's not what I am talking about. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Human is right. AceModerator 03:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I agree with weaseloid. ТyrannisAn iron, but caring, fist 19:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

the "rated" template[edit]

Where do I bring it to the "community"? The Saloon Bar passes by so fast I never see the same topic twice. I also never saw where the idea that any idiot could rate an article's importance with a stupid category that is all talk pages got "approved". No, this is a stupid thing and should be obliterated, with due discussion. But where? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Forum, debate, project page, RationalWiki talk:Article rating... Flip a coin twice (or use a sticky thread at the bar). Peter with added ‼Science‼ 04:50, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I guess I have brought it up, and received no cogent answers. Just lazy people doing what lazy people do - make an easy way to make a statement, do it enough and no one can undo it. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)