RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3500Goal: $3500

User talk:LCRex

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, LCRex!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Christopher (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Just to let you know[edit]

Looking at the list of red links on your user page, I'd just like to say this. The correct title of the page would just be Kidnapped for Christ. If disambiguation were needed, the page would be called Kidnapped for Christ (film), not Kidnapped for Christ (Movie). There doesn't, however, seem to be anything else with the same name. So no disambiguation is needed.

You have yourself a fabulous day! Spud (talk) 13:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, Spud! I'll get to changing the link. LCRex (poses menacingly) 13:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

You've been demoted![edit]

Congratulations, LCRex! You've been demoted to the status of autopatrolled. This means you can bypass the CAPTCHA when editing and sysops won't have to click a pesky little button for each of your edits. Enjoy your new powers! Spriggina (puhua) (maksut) @ 14:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


Your request has been fulfilled.

Dear LCRex,

We regret to inform you that you have been demoted to the rank of sysop. You are requested to report to a bureaucrat at your nearest possible convenience, to be haz been given a mop and bucket for the purposes of cleaning up the mess around here. No questions are allowed. If you have any further questions, (further questions are permissible) please refer to the enclosed pamphlet So you are now a sysop. At your leisure, please go to the dungeon Room 202 to see the reward mops and hammers you can work towards having!

--It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 03:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

The rape apologist you reverted[edit]

You can just block obvious trolls like that in the future. Go to their contributions, click “block user” at the top and select block length and reason. Christopher (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

You can also try the shiny new vandal bin feature as part of the janitor toolset. Just go in the contributions and click on "vandal bin". If you need instructions on how to get through that, check out the enclosed instruction book. ;) --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 21:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)


You don't need to timestamp edit summaries, the software does that automatically. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


I propose a compromise to end our disagreement on the Manosphere Glossary. I'll stop reverting any changes for the definition of divorce rape. In return, I need you to re-look at the study in Reference 41. The authors clearly state that "this is not so much a gender thing as a parent thing." (par. 5) and that "when a man leaves a childless marriage, his income immediately rises by 25%" (par. 6). What I'm trying to say is that you don't have any evidence that men generally do better financially after divorce. To be fair, what you *do* have evidence for is that childless men generally do better than childless women. Tyrone8934 (talk) 08:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)