User talk:MysteryMan9000
— Unsigned, by: Cosmikdebris / talk / contribs 00:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Autopatrolled[edit]
Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.
We hope you enjoy your newfound ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ — and these external tools:
- Rbutr shows user-submitted rebuttals to your current webpage.
- Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
- web.archive.org and archive.is can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again!
—Kazitor, pending 09:02, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Are you okay?[edit]
For your entire history here, you've been doing little except write out poorly formatted large ranting nonstop about some guys on DeviantArt. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 00:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Of course I am... Its just that I felt like not only DeviantART needs fact-checkers, but also Felt like these 2 users (wwwarea and Another-Realm) should have written their books about their ideas of freedom instead of arguing with morons. yeah, these are poorly formatted. Pardon me.MysteryMan9000 (talk) 00:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- I mean, Deviantart has its fair share of morons, like this global warming denying asswipe. Any large community does, as it's bounds to attract people, good and pseudo-intellectual. People who write screed like those in deviantArt are powerless dweebs who just want attention. They are allowed to do write shit, but you're giving them exactly what they want by drawing attention to them every time you rant about idiots. Those people don't deserve your time. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 01:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Yeah... Thanks for telling me, simply I want people to be aware of the psuedoscience, but.. turns out they don't deserve my time, I mean I still belive fact-checkers should be in there, but I digress. Normally I want people to be aware of psuedo-intellectual groups like WorldEvents, but well it is a waste of time. Normally my about wwwarea and Another-Realm is about how they waste time with morons instead of making books about their ideas, something a DeviantART user should have told them, but I digress from that. Thanks for the information. This time I won't be ranting about them any longer. if that makes you feel better MysteryMan9000 (talk) 03:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
YES[edit]
ˆIt is true that I ranted about deviantART and idiots clogging the site, I wanted people to be aware of this, but it seems like they are powerless doofuses who want attention, only to join cults such as BreakingTheIllusion and WorldEvents where they worship and belive everything what InfoWars and NaturalNews while parading on the whole United States is Evil and Rothschilds are the enemy of the American People and hating the American Media.
I apologize to the RationalWiki Community as well, normally someone at the Talk Page about DevianART maybe an idiot claiming how "RationalWiki is BIASED"
"Is this like another ED site that likes to bash people because they get offended by criticism? For example, whining about "wwwarea" and "Another-Realm" because some idiot thinks both are wrong without proof while ignoring many criticism, and pretends the opinion against the criticism "right" and then treats I think, big media as "truth"? Many people were right, this site itself is bullshit, and isn't rational. XD I don't see any well written criticism toward many of the points from Deviantart.
This page should be deleted, and hell, since when does this have anything to do with religion? I don't know about everything on the page, but the part with "another-realm" and "wwwarea", it's usually about exposing things that involves Copyright law? Written on 3/23/2018"
Bullshit? Anyone who says this is just one of the "I thought it was supposed to be RationalWiki" and I was offended by critisism, This is considered to be assumption coming from somebody who doesn't like their views on everything to be challenged or second opinions. Anyone who thinks RationalWiki is full of shit are in the right either has 0 idea its true motive. Sounds like they are more offended by a "whiner" who in reality has 0 idea, That page is more about exposing WorldEvents as a racist Alt-Right pile of garbage and BreakingTheIllusion to be full of crap who cites bullshit websites without any fact-checking. I myslef talked about how OnlyTheGhosts hates Fact-Chekcers because they hate Trump. Wow!
The whole "some idiot thinks both are wrong without proof while ignoring many criticism, and pretends the opinion against the criticism "right" and then treats I think, big media as "truth"?" is pure bullshit. We pointed flaws about CNN and Fox News and the reason why you say without proof is because You are unable to see reason and instead want to believe whatever you believe and fail to realize that Proof can come from Expierence without the need of the Internet.
Anyone who says this has shown to be pseudo-intellectual who thinks what we say in never proof and his beliefs and opinions and thoughts are 100% right. Dont take my word for it, if anyone wants to say we are Wrong, instead of writing a journal about why we are full of shit, why not show facts instead.
I am wasting time with this because I see no value, feel free to advice me and criticize my time here, and I bought that quote from the Talk Page on DeviantART because that is depressing, laughable, hilarious and unsettling and it is a RANT like what I said about the idiots on DeviantART, its just a complaining without any links proving us wrong.
This is a waste of time and I can accept it. --MysteryMan9000 (talk) 02:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Trout[edit]
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Somebody just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
--It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 04:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- --It's okay, I deserve it anyways MysteryMan9000 (talk) 01:34, 15 September 2018 (UTC)