User talk:Nutty Roux/Archive7
Thanks[edit]
Thank you for the support. As I was trying to tell Ace, the issue is no different than Ken DeMeyer or Karajou disrupting discussions between editors by blocking, and Mikalos doing the same thing. nobsModerated 04:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Please send me and Trent frozen Hatch chiles. Thanks much. 04:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Racism[edit]
Your anti-New Zealand tirades won't get you far. Racism, pure unadulterated racism. I am on to you...you fascist communist womanizing scum-flaps. AceModerator 07:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yep. Them New Zealanders are stealing jobs from US manufacturers when they began making their own special novelty devices -- strap on dildos for four legged creatures. nobsModerated 13:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Rock out with your cock out[edit]
AceModerator 00:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I have not sent you a very important email[edit]
Really, I haven't. Don't believe me? Check your email... ħuman 02:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- What, we don't talk enough already? 03:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why can't I not have an email also? Cunts. AceModerator 03:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Screw both of you. I called Human yesterday and he didn't answer. You barely talked to me and even then all you did was complain. You suck. Now all I need is Crundy to tell me he's not emailing me either. Josh and Goonie already told me to fuck off. 03:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- I tried calling Huw yesterday too but he never answered even though Skype told me he was online. Fuck you all. AceModerator 03:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- My new monitor for the new "social" machine has really pathetic sound, sadly. Although most of yesterday I was busy beating its Vista ass back to 1998. ħuman 03:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Vista was/is frigging awful. AceModerator 08:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Nutty Roux,
- I meant to email you sooner but I just been busy.
- You said your girlfriend's pregnant now,
- how far along is she?
- I'm sorry I didn't email you during the elections, I must've missed you,
- don't think I did that shit intentionally just to diss you.
- ...well, you get the idea. SJ Debaser 11:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- You must be thinking of another oversexed libertine, as I am careful to ensure women I get pregnant do not remain girlfriends. If a "liberated" woman cannot be trusted to take care of her own damn uterus she certainly cannot be trusted to cook and clean for me competently and without sassing off. Good day, sir. 16:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Vista was/is frigging awful. AceModerator 08:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think any of you e-mailed me. But then again, I'm probably going to go on hiatus for a bit. steriletalk 08:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- We've been talking about you Sterile. Expect an epistle by carrier pigeon by the morrow. 16:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'll send you an email because I love you :) CrundyTalk nerdy to me 11:12, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- My new monitor for the new "social" machine has really pathetic sound, sadly. Although most of yesterday I was busy beating its Vista ass back to 1998. ħuman 03:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- I tried calling Huw yesterday too but he never answered even though Skype told me he was online. Fuck you all. AceModerator 03:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Screw both of you. I called Human yesterday and he didn't answer. You barely talked to me and even then all you did was complain. You suck. Now all I need is Crundy to tell me he's not emailing me either. Josh and Goonie already told me to fuck off. 03:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Why can't I not have an email also? Cunts. AceModerator 03:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I emailed every single one of you because you are all the wind beneath my wings. There I said it. 13:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I've got something to tell you baby.[edit]
Email. Okay. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 17:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Broke, bumming money and living outdoors.[edit]
AceModerator 10:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry buddy but you have me mixed up with someone else. I don't dig on hiphop. 13:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Fuck this shit, you can't beat the fucking classics....[edit]
AceModerator 07:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC) This record blew me away when it came out. I regret it taking 10 years to rediscover how much 7th Chamber would be my theme song if I had one. "Quick to stick my Wu-Tang sword wight thwough ya navo." 15:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Redlineing[edit]
So I was watching you painstakingly "blackline" your text, and suddenly felt very very very sorry for my colleges 10 years older than myself (or so). by the time I started doing these, I push one button on MS Word and there it is. GodotGrow a vagina 00:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused by the stance you have[edit]
You dont want to see stuff like that in the Coop, but at the same time the reason it is in the coop is because we keep dismissing the things. --il'Dictator Mikal (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- The reason it's in the coop is because you and Ace keep bringing it there. At least he's not calling for a ban. The reason you're confused is because you apparently don't understand that I view you as the problem. 17:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- The stance i currently have in that Coop is "small reprimand against rob for racial slurs". not a full on ban, just a small punishment because it doesnt matter if itds NOT against the rules; racial slurs shouldnt be tolerated. And im not sorry if you see me as the problem.--il'Dictator Mikal (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- The coop is for srs business. "I know where you live, P-Foster and I'm coming for you and your border collie", not "lol, u look like a cholo". The cabal is a bunch of thin-skinned power trippers. The 'right to be ignored' should be respected. Occasionaluse (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- There is no cabal. Never was. steriletalk 18:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- "the finest trick of the devil is to persuade you that he does not exist" Occasionaluse (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- There is no cabal. Never was. steriletalk 18:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- The coop is for srs business. "I know where you live, P-Foster and I'm coming for you and your border collie", not "lol, u look like a cholo". The cabal is a bunch of thin-skinned power trippers. The 'right to be ignored' should be respected. Occasionaluse (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- The stance i currently have in that Coop is "small reprimand against rob for racial slurs". not a full on ban, just a small punishment because it doesnt matter if itds NOT against the rules; racial slurs shouldnt be tolerated. And im not sorry if you see me as the problem.--il'Dictator Mikal (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Dead bent yo[edit]
AceModerator 21:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Great sample great MC. You just showed me something I didn't know. 00:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- Lil out of date but some of the best mash and sample I've heard in a long time. Hot tracks on both side. 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
After....after.....love comes teeearzzzz.[edit]
I gotta catch me some Zzzzzzz's but I'll skype you in about 10 hours or so. So you know, get the fucking ready. AceModerator 11:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm only responding to check the timestamp so I'll know when to ignore you. 15:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Fucker[edit]
Skype fucker. AceModerator 21:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
What did YOU do today?[edit]
Last night I rolled around drunk and mistook a hyena for an Ape-man then spent the day driving around near the Mozambique border listening to 36 Chambers and drinking swag. What did YOU do today? AceModerator 16:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- That sounds delightful. I did the same thing last night except the Ape-Man however many pitchers of PBR it takes to empty my wallet and Enter the 36 Chambers was me staggering home talking on the phone with this woman I've been sort of seeing for a month who told me she has trouble distinguishing between sex and intimacy and that I like her more than she likes me. So I woke up hung over about 20 minutes ago and I'm having a scotch/double americano and some Advil. Having a breakfast of 9 strips of bacon, an egg I won't eat, and some baguette. What are you wearing? 17:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Send me the egg, I'm hungry. SJ Debaser 17:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- I will give you an egg if you tell me what you're wearing. 22:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well I've had a free house this weekend and as I have no money to go out I've been sitting on the couch in my underwear, drinking beer which doesn't belong to me, and watching classic action/crime movies. Last night was Jackie Brown followed by Reservoir Dogs rounded up by Lethal Weapon 2. Afterwards I checked the toilet for a bomb as my housemates will not be back til Monday and I didn't want to lose all of Sunday on the toilet. SJ Debaser 11:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- That's my favorite kind of weekend. Nothing quite like sponging off your roommates and sitting around stinking the place up. Ahh to be young and drunk again. I went to an overpriced Korean BBQ and on top of still smelling like kimchi and chile pork had to check myself from getting too drunk to drive. Horrible bullshit. Don't you ever leave that apartment, Josh. It's nothing but suffering out there. 19:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well I've had a free house this weekend and as I have no money to go out I've been sitting on the couch in my underwear, drinking beer which doesn't belong to me, and watching classic action/crime movies. Last night was Jackie Brown followed by Reservoir Dogs rounded up by Lethal Weapon 2. Afterwards I checked the toilet for a bomb as my housemates will not be back til Monday and I didn't want to lose all of Sunday on the toilet. SJ Debaser 11:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- I will give you an egg if you tell me what you're wearing. 22:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Send me the egg, I'm hungry. SJ Debaser 17:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
He is not fat,[edit]
he is seasonably plump.Choice McGnarly (talk) 07:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
fuck you[edit]
AceModerator 11:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Yep. Fuck me. Fuck it all. 16:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
And this. 16:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
and you[edit]
... i dont have anything to apologize for, I really know you won't give a fuck what I say, and i don't really like you... but god damnit it I respect you. --il'Dictator Mikal 03:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I like you fine, you just act like a turd sometimes. 03:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- He acts fine -- I'm the one that acts like a turd (and not of the polished variety). An American Fallacy (super crazy fun time!) 04:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know who you are so I'll take your word for it. Problem is I've been drinking so its hard to see the worst in people with the world lit up like this. 05:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- ...Fallacy? You know, that guy who regularly posts in the Saloon Bar and engages in pointless block wars, and is also awesome and sexy? An American Fallacy (super crazy fun time!) 06:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know who you are so I'll take your word for it. Problem is I've been drinking so its hard to see the worst in people with the world lit up like this. 05:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- He acts fine -- I'm the one that acts like a turd (and not of the polished variety). An American Fallacy (super crazy fun time!) 04:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Happy birthday[edit]
I thought of you briefly last night while making love. SJ Debaser 12:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed, happy birthday. You'll have to insert your own pithy comment here - I had too much absinthe last night and my brain is still AWOL. --PsyGremlinSprich! 12:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
AceModerator 20:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- HAPPY BIRTHDAY, YOU MAGNIFICENT NUT! So, you turning 38 or 39 today? :-) Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- 38. 04:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Pfft. I turned 38 almost three months ago. steriletalk 04:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ah shit man I'm sorry I missed that. Happy belated. Thanks Stabby, you magnificent cunt. 05:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck! Can't believe I missed this. Happy belated one, Nutty! Recklessly Noise Punk What's this button do? Uh oh.... 07:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck x2. Also didn't know t'was your birthday. Have another scotch on me to celebrate. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 08:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck! Can't believe I missed this. Happy belated one, Nutty! Recklessly Noise Punk What's this button do? Uh oh.... 07:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ah shit man I'm sorry I missed that. Happy belated. Thanks Stabby, you magnificent cunt. 05:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Pfft. I turned 38 almost three months ago. steriletalk 04:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- 38. 04:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
It may be stupid...[edit]
...or it might not be but nonetheless... AceModerator 20:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Awesome McSandwiches[edit]
I know you wanna do it....
AceModerator 05:46, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey buddy. Admittedly coarser than usual for these pussies but I grew up listening to this. Pre Dirty South. Pre that movie that's the only thing people know these guys for. It's legit. 06:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
PS: love Sandwiches and big girls. 06:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Here is some nasty shit (Sandwiches - one of my favourite clips).
AceModerator 06:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey. Hey. Hey.[edit]
E-mail. You has.--Dumpling (talk) 23:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, I'm looking forward to that. Keep in touch. 69.203.2.229 (talk) 03:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Email[edit]
I have sent you an email, discussing stuff. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 07:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Iay have sent...[edit]
... ouyay an... ailemay. El TajDon't make me do stuff 11:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I am probably flogging a decomposing equine...[edit]
...but it has just come to my attention that you have been unilaterally deleting articles on the pretext that it is necessary for reasons related to the Foundation's cash flow. All other issues aside, I think that as a trustee, you should have consulted the rest of the Board before making such a move, since it could have been construed as an attempt by the Board to set editorial policy. ListenerXTalkerX 04:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'd consult the board if I was doing what you accuse me of but I was not. I was expressing a personal opinion. 12:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Similarly, President Roosevelt was just expressing a personal opinion when he said that December 7, 1941 would live in infamy. ListenerXTalkerX 04:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sigh. Go be contrarian and make shitty overblown analogies to someone else. You'll know if I ever purport to speak on behalf of the corporation because I'll say so and it will be consistent with my authority under the bylaws. 05:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- I know that, but other editors apparently did not (e.g., the people who wrote rww:The Great Deconservapediafication). ListenerXTalkerX 07:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sigh. Go be contrarian and make shitty overblown analogies to someone else. You'll know if I ever purport to speak on behalf of the corporation because I'll say so and it will be consistent with my authority under the bylaws. 05:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Similarly, President Roosevelt was just expressing a personal opinion when he said that December 7, 1941 would live in infamy. ListenerXTalkerX 04:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
AAAaaaa[edit]
This creationist video is burning my brain! Make it stop! MAKE IT STOP! steriletalk 03:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- I tried watching it and found myself wanted to stab my brain. I hate you for mentioning it over there. 03:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yay! Another enemy! Woo-hoo! AAAAaaa! Brain melting again! steriletalk 03:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's basically a sure thing that I'll have made a fact free assertion if, in the course of a discussion that's been going on for years in which Philip refuses to concede a single point, I recap what his opponents have argued into the ground. It's beautiful and horrifying all at once. 03:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yay! Another enemy! Woo-hoo! AAAAaaa! Brain melting again! steriletalk 03:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Damnit! I was going to make this my sig, but he doesn't have choose on!
I have defined information!
There!
- Ho hum, another fact free claim from Sterile. AceModerator 05:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Something from nothing, dude. Guth said nothing. Nothing. sterileevolutionist story telling 05:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- But is it a meaningful gain of information? This creation.com link will explain nothing. AceModerator 05:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Chalk and cheese. sterileevolutionist story telling 02:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- But is it a meaningful gain of information? This creation.com link will explain nothing. AceModerator 05:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Something from nothing, dude. Guth said nothing. Nothing. sterileevolutionist story telling 05:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ho hum, another fact free claim from Sterile. AceModerator 05:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey Nutty...[edit]
I'm a little pissed off at the treatment I'm getting over there of some of my better material. [1] If Obama gets re-elected, I'm gonna blame those assholes. Run it down for me again about a data dump on those e-mails and how I'd have editorial control on the final copy? nobsCorporations are people, too. 03:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Remind me by email. I'm a little preoccupied to do much on RW as Nutty Roux. 03:55, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Fuck you scumbag[edit]
AceModerator 23:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
"No wonder RW isn't taken seriously as an anti-creationist resource."[edit]
Not criticizing your edit to the Ray Comfort article -- it was necessary. Just wondering what the criteria are for "serious," because I don't think Talk Origins can be surpassed in this niche. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 05:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- I responded to you by email. 13:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- ...If you think what I write also qualifies as "absolutely dreadful nonsense written by nonspecialists who didn't do the research and write poorly, yet feel perfectly comfortable heaping on the "snark."", don't forget to say. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 21:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- I would have. 23:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Good. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 01:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- I would have. 23:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think that "serious anti-creationist resources" are doomed to failure, since firstly, it is futile to try and use reason and reality to reach a population that has gone beyond the pale, and secondly, supporters of evolution have a crucial advantage in not having to stick to a script like creationists do, and this is an advantage that should be pressed. Removing poorly written/researched material is an altogether separate concern from removing snark. ListenerXTalkerX 21:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- The point isn't to convert the "true believers," but to defuse the bullshit they churn out by providing a resource countering it. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- That is true, which is why the serious, technical route does not work — it will implicitly be addressed only at those who are beyond the pale. We need to go the snarkier, less technical route, seeing as how creationists aim their propaganda mostly at the scientifically illiterate. ListenerXTalkerX 22:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- That's why they laughingly call it "creation science" - putting the moron into oxymoron. ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you. 23:57, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- That is true, which is why the serious, technical route does not work — it will implicitly be addressed only at those who are beyond the pale. We need to go the snarkier, less technical route, seeing as how creationists aim their propaganda mostly at the scientifically illiterate. ListenerXTalkerX 22:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- The point isn't to convert the "true believers," but to defuse the bullshit they churn out by providing a resource countering it. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- ...If you think what I write also qualifies as "absolutely dreadful nonsense written by nonspecialists who didn't do the research and write poorly, yet feel perfectly comfortable heaping on the "snark."", don't forget to say. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 21:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Can you intervene?[edit]
I had a look through your contributions and you seem reasonable enough. Can you please intervene with this Copperhead guy, he is being really abusive and personal. I'm trying to compromise by moving his abuse to the talk page but I think he will continue to vandalise the debate page. Thanks. MarkCarthy (talk) 14:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh dear, running to popsy? You're so cute! CopperheadHisssssss 14:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I won't intervene to correct someone's tone because we don't regulate most speech here. I'll have a look at what you're moving. That sounds problematic if it's a debate page. If you think he's so bad you should definitely declare victory. 14:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- He can be as abusive as he wants but I've asked about six times now for him to leave me alone. Furthermore I'm attempting to move his abuse to a seperate page as it interfers with the flow of the discourse, which he clearly has no interest in taking part. Anything you can do would be great, thanks. MarkCarthy (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh you're so bad at this I'm laughing. CopperheadHisssssss 14:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'll keep playing along until my coffee kicks in. Then you're on your own. Ignore him if you think he's such a creep. That's how it's done in the marketplace of ideas. As much as I sympathize with your frustration, it's too difficult to discern the difference between what you describe as abuse and substantive comments and nobody here's going to let you try. To the extent there's anything substantive in what he's saying, you need to stop trying to move it. If it's literally no more than name calling then it might be consistent with custom and practice to use that trolltop template but you're just going to start a bigger fight. I'd just let it go and go smugly revel in your victory. You're clearly the bigger man. 14:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh you're so bad at this I'm laughing. CopperheadHisssssss 14:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- He can be as abusive as he wants but I've asked about six times now for him to leave me alone. Furthermore I'm attempting to move his abuse to a seperate page as it interfers with the flow of the discourse, which he clearly has no interest in taking part. Anything you can do would be great, thanks. MarkCarthy (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I won't intervene to correct someone's tone because we don't regulate most speech here. I'll have a look at what you're moving. That sounds problematic if it's a debate page. If you think he's so bad you should definitely declare victory. 14:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
'We don't regulate speech here'[edit]
I find that very hard to believe. I'm willing to wager that a quick look at the archives would disprove this particular claim. MarkCarthy (talk) 14:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- You're sooo bad at this, so you even try? Do you enjoy the mockery? Would you like to visit by dungeon of delights? It'll be fun! CopperheadHisssssss 14:41, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. How much you got? Other than obvious things like vandalism, racism, and these awful cunts removing Marcus' moments because they banned him, go find me some examples of people removing comments from a debate. 14:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Deletions[edit]
Why are you deleting all of that guys' subpages? Did he ask you to do so or something? They don't appear to break any rules or anything.--talk 03:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Undeleted. He can have them if he wants. AceModerator 03:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I'm sure NR didn't delete them just because he didn't like the guy having them!--talk 03:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't really give a shit if they're in his userspace or not. They were deleted from the wiki by consensus and there's no reason for him to keep them here rather than on his own damn hard drive. More than anything I was hoping to avoid Google picking that useless horseshit up again because it makes RW look like a bunch of sneering children. Maybe we should ask Trent to exclude userspace and funspace from robot crawls and anyone can put anything he wants in his userspace! As always, you guys can do whatever you want. I don't feel like arguing over something I'm not going to win. 03:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure you can tell search engines not to index certain pages. There's probably a "magic word" for it. --"Shut up, Brx." 04:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- It would be a pretty good idea to add the entirety of userspace in here, yes. Peter is procrastinating. 04:35, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- The magic words are "you're still not welcome, go fuck yourself, Brxbrx." Didn't you know that? Why are you still here? 04:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- No, you stupid half-wit. I was talking about the mediawiki feature. Can't you stop stroking your hate-on for two seconds?--"Shut up, Brx." 04:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Brx, you talking to Nutty for any reason is going to cause him to lash out. So, you know, fuck off. AceModerator 04:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed.--talk 05:31, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- sterileevolutionist story telling 05:40, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed.--talk 05:31, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Brx, you talking to Nutty for any reason is going to cause him to lash out. So, you know, fuck off. AceModerator 04:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- No, you stupid half-wit. I was talking about the mediawiki feature. Can't you stop stroking your hate-on for two seconds?--"Shut up, Brx." 04:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- The magic words are "you're still not welcome, go fuck yourself, Brxbrx." Didn't you know that? Why are you still here? 04:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- It would be a pretty good idea to add the entirety of userspace in here, yes. Peter is procrastinating. 04:35, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I guess since you're already climbing on the cross over this, NR, you know the score well-enough. Glad this is resolved, then.--talk 05:31, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Climbing on the cross? I guess being humiliated by shitty off-mission content is a no-no. Brx, you added nothing, as usual. God you suck. When are you going to fuck off? 06:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- adding __NOINDEX__ to the pages in Bootmii's user space should stop them from showing up on search engines (assuming subpages don't have that automatically). Pay attention--"Shut up, Brx." 06:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Brx, no one is interested. AceModerator 06:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm interested in seeing Brxbrx disappear. 15:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- You know... any new people or professional types who visit can see this conversation, and wouldn't have the context that brx completely deserves what he's getting; they would just see us being giant assholes to somebody who doesn't seem to have done anything wrong--il'Dictator Mikal 16:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Isn't that called "reality". If you walked into my law firm and listened to us talked about our cases, without context you'd think we really hated our clients. Godot 16:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- a good point, but It still doesn't help the image for the website --il'Dictator Mikal 16:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Really, I find Brx annoying as hell, but jesus fuck. Would it help if someone else made his suggestion? I don't see what the harm is in having a nonindexed page in your own userspace, unless it's racist or something. It's not like it's being linked to; you'd have to go out of your way to find it, and even then you'd have to know what to look for. Cow...Hammertime! 16:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this discussion even makes sense or if I was right to delete those articles. I need to know for certain whether pages in the user space show up on Google. In any event, I'm not going to have this meta conversation except to point out that I sincerely doubt a visitor to the website is looking at Recent Changes as obsessively as you do, Mikalos. Or at all. The reality is our readers are coming in on Google searches of relevant terms and the front page and moving around by following wikilinks and exploring categories. I hope those Google hits don't include articles in Bootme's userspace that were deleted because they're pointless, embarrassing, and cast RW as a bunch of puerile jerks. If you're really concerned someone's going to miss the reason most of us think Brxbrx is worthless scum, we can simply refer them to RWW and his own talk page. But really? Someone who doesn't seem to have done anything wrong? If a turd like Brxbrx draws this much scorn from a community, don' you assume it's because he pulled enough nonsense to wear his welcome out? 16:55, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Really, I find Brx annoying as hell, but jesus fuck. Would it help if someone else made his suggestion? I don't see what the harm is in having a nonindexed page in your own userspace, unless it's racist or something. It's not like it's being linked to; you'd have to go out of your way to find it, and even then you'd have to know what to look for. Cow...Hammertime! 16:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- a good point, but It still doesn't help the image for the website --il'Dictator Mikal 16:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Isn't that called "reality". If you walked into my law firm and listened to us talked about our cases, without context you'd think we really hated our clients. Godot 16:09, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- You know... any new people or professional types who visit can see this conversation, and wouldn't have the context that brx completely deserves what he's getting; they would just see us being giant assholes to somebody who doesn't seem to have done anything wrong--il'Dictator Mikal 16:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm interested in seeing Brxbrx disappear. 15:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Brx, no one is interested. AceModerator 06:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- adding __NOINDEX__ to the pages in Bootmii's user space should stop them from showing up on search engines (assuming subpages don't have that automatically). Pay attention--"Shut up, Brx." 06:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Climbing on the cross? I guess being humiliated by shitty off-mission content is a no-no. Brx, you added nothing, as usual. God you suck. When are you going to fuck off? 06:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure you can tell search engines not to index certain pages. There's probably a "magic word" for it. --"Shut up, Brx." 04:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't really give a shit if they're in his userspace or not. They were deleted from the wiki by consensus and there's no reason for him to keep them here rather than on his own damn hard drive. More than anything I was hoping to avoid Google picking that useless horseshit up again because it makes RW look like a bunch of sneering children. Maybe we should ask Trent to exclude userspace and funspace from robot crawls and anyone can put anything he wants in his userspace! As always, you guys can do whatever you want. I don't feel like arguing over something I'm not going to win. 03:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I'm sure NR didn't delete them just because he didn't like the guy having them!--talk 03:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Google is picking it up. I'll be deleting it all again when I get back to a computer. 13:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)