Irish slaves

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Fiction over fact
Pseudohistory
Icon ancient aliens.svg
How it didn't happen
The colorful pseudoscience
Racialism
Icon race.svg
Hating thy neighbour
Divide and conquer
Dog-whistlers

Irish slaves is a term and a myth which refers to the supposed historical exploitation of Irishmen as slave labor. It is frequently evoked by, on the one hand, white supremacists, white nationalists, Neo-Nazis, Stormfront users and Neo-Confederates claiming that the enslavement of Africans doesn't matter because "White people were slaves too", and, on the other, by Irish nationalists wanting to feed their persecution complex.

Origins[edit]

The origin of this myth is from a 1993 book called They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of The Enslavement of Whites in America self-published and written by conspiracy theorist and Holocaust denier Michael A. Hoffman II. The myth was further advanced in Ireland by journalist Sean O'Conaghan in the book To Hell or Barbados: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ireland and other books such as White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britain's White Slaves. Since then, the "Irish slaves" myth has been repeated frequently on social media such as Facebook often with unrelated images as "pictures" of Irish slaves.

The most common themes of the "Irish slaves" myth according to Wikipedia are:

  • The media and historians are covering it up.
  • The Irish people were enslaved after the Cromwellian Invasion of Ireland in 1649
  • Irish slaves were treated worse than African slaves and female Irish were forced to reproduce with male Africans.
  • Using a forged 1625 declaration by King James II of sending thousands of Irish prisoners to the West Indies as slaves (despite the fact James II hadn't even been born yet).
  • Using actual slave atrocities such as the 1781 Zong Massacre by substituting African slaves with Irish.

Debunked[edit]

The problem with this whole idea is that the "Irish slaves" were in fact indentured servants. While both indentured servitude and chattel slavery may be considered subcategories of "slavery," and indeed both are banned within the United Nation's 1956 Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery,[1] the two are very different concepts in practice. Indentured servants agreed to work for a period varying between 2 to 7 years (in most cases[citation needed] voluntarily), in exchange for being transported to the Americas. At the end of this period, they were free. Chattel slavery, however, as is well known, was permanent and persisted to the descendants of slaves. While indentured servants probably had it bad, the difference between indentured servitude and slavery is enormous, as described by Liam Hogan:[2]

Chattel slavery was perpetual, a slave was only free once they were no longer alive; it was hereditary, the children of slaves were the property of their owner; the status of chattel slave was designated by ‘race’, there was no escaping your bloodline; a chattel slave was treated like livestock, you could kill your slaves while applying “moderate correction” and the homicide law would not apply; the execution of ‘insolent’ slaves was encouraged in these slavocracies to deter insurrections and disobedience, and their owners were paid generous compensation for their ‘loss’; an indentured servant could appeal to a court of law if they were mistreated, a slave had no recourse for justice. And so on…

It's also relevant that the period in which Irish people were placed in indentured servitude was during the 17th century, whereas black slavery continued for another 200 years: most "Irish slaves" were exported to the Caribbean by the British. Where "Irish slaves" augmented an existing workforce, the enslavement and exploitation of black slaves was an integral part of the economy. "Irish slaves" were primarily exported by Oliver Cromwell, some hundreds of years before the major waves of Irish immigration to the US, so it was never really relevant to Irish Americans—in fact, many Irish people moved to the South and strove hard to become slaveowners themselves. The American Dream, huh? It was such an issue that prominent Irish politician Daniel O'Connell began petitioning Irish Americans not to take part in the slave trade.

Irish Nationalists may also be unfamiliar with the fact that the Irish State set unmarried mothers working for low or no pay, throughout the 20th century without their consent.

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]