Emily Willoughby

From RationalWiki
(Redirected from Linda A. Ashtear)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Emily Willoughby
The colorful pseudoscience
Racialism
Icon race.svg
Hating thy neighbour
Divide and conquer
Dog-whistlers
v - t - e
Red x.svg An editor believes that this article should be deleted but has given no reason.
Please discuss this assassination attempt on this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.

Emily A. Willoughby (1986–) is an American[1] right-wing paleoartist,Wikipedia biological psychologist, and proponent of race and intelligence pseudoscience.

As of 2012, Willoughby identified politically as "fiscally conservative but not terribly socially conservative" (read: libertarian),[2] and wrote a single article for the rag Quillette in 2017 that was against creationism.[3][4]

On August 11, 2022 a Twitter thread accusing Willoughby of racism and eugenics went viral in the paleoart community.[5][6] After people began to look into her digital footprint — she spent years making controversial edits on Wikipedia's race and intelligenceWikipedia article and has defended far-right individuals including Michael Coombs and Emil Kirkegaard whom she collaborated with on Wikipedia.[note 1][7][8][9] For disruption on the race and intelligence page, Willoughby was topic banned on Wikipedia in October 2010, banned from the wiki in May 2012, but unbanned with editing restrictions in March 2014.[10] Her ex-boyfriend, Jonathan Kane (who has occasionally co-authored works with her), is permanently banned from Wikipedia for edit-warringWikipedia on the same race and intelligence article.

The revelation that Willoughby is a proponent of race and IQ pseudoscience and has links to white nationalists led numerous academics to distance themselves from her, notably including palaeontologists Darren Naish,[11] Mark P. WittonWikipedia[12] and Lisa Buckley.[13] On the other hand, the biologist Jerry Coyne has defended her in a blog post.[14]

Willoughby is a board member of International Society for Intelligence Research and is a speaker at their annual conferences.[15][16][17][18][19]

Background

Willoughby's academic qualifications include a bachelor's degree in biology from Thomas Edison University, a master's degree and PhD in psychology from the University of Minnesota.[20] She is currently a postdoctoral researcher in the behavior genetics lab at the University of Minnesota.[21][22] Willoughby has published on behavioural genetics and IQ in peer-reviewed journals such as Nature Genetics, Intelligence, and Journal of Personality.[23]

In 2017, she co-authored with Jonathan Kane and T. Michael Keesey the anti-creationism book God's Word or Human Reason? An Inside Perspective on Creationism.[24][25] The book has been praised,[26] including for its "painstakingly detailed rebuttals to papers by creationists."[27] In March 2018, Naish wrote a positive review on his Tetrapod Zoology blog at Scientific American.[28]

Willoughby is an accomplished paleoartist and in addition to her postdoctoral job works part time as a professional scientific illustrator. Her artwork can be found on her old and current DeviantArt pages.[29][30] She has done illustrations of dinosaurs for scientific papers, including Nature.[31] In October 2021, she published Drawing and Painting Dinosaurs: Using Art and Science to Bring the Past to Life[32] which has received favourable book reviews.[33] She has been interviewed by Mark P. Witton on his palaeontological blog.[34]

Controversies

Race and intelligence

Research

In 2023, Willoughby and a colleague by the name of James J. Lee were given a half-a-million dollar grant to conduct research into "genetic cognition" by the racist "Institute of Mental Chronometry".[35][36][note 2]

A Troublesome Inheritance

Willoughby and Kane co-authored a 2014 book review for Nicholas Wade's A Troublesome Inheritance,Wikipedia which both criticized and praised it, though was more defensive of the book than critical.[37] Anthropologist Cathryn Townsend took exception to the review's "bashing [of] Gould and Jonathan MarksWikipedia for the work they've done in dispelling racist pseudoscience."[38] (The review really goes after Marks much more than Gould, claiming Marks may have a "conflict of interest" in reviewing the book because he takes a more anti-hereditarian approach in his professional work; in their perception this was feeding Marks his own medicine: "if he intends to denounce A Troublesome Inheritance by attacking Wade's motives, he should be prepared for his own to be questioned as well."[37]) In her thread, Townsend recommended a 2019 blog post on the subject: Has Stephen Jay Gould's The Mismeasure of Man really been discredited?.[38][39]

Willoughby and Kane's book review also cited The 10,000 Year Explosion (2009) as an example of a "not especially controversial" book which expresses "the idea that evolutionary differences between human groups have contributed to cultural differences today".[37] This line is perhaps noteworthy because the SPLC later considered similarities between the book's arguments about the evolutionary development of Ashkenazi Jews and those made by the antisemitic evo-psychologist Kevin MacDonald,[40] whose (actually very dubious) methodology was highly criticized from at least 2018 onward, especially by Nathan Cofnas.[note 3][41][42] The SPLC's comparison was not at all unfounded since one of the book's co-authors had directly cited MacDonald in a previous paper, Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence (2006).

International Society for Intelligence Research

Willoughby is an International Society for Intelligence Research board member[15] and was involved in creating the program for ISIR's annual conference in 2021.[17] She was a speaker at the 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023 conferences.[16][17][18][19] The 2023 conference was attended by staff from the far-right Aporia Magazine and white nationalists such as Edward Dutton.[43][44]

See also

External links

Notes

  1. ↑ They edited the same topic areas, and in the case of Mikemikev she does seem to have defended him on Wikipedia at one point. This doesn't necessarily imply off-site coordination. See below.
  2. ↑ Emil Kirkegaard is a big fan of Lee's poisonous racialist bullshit apparently.[35]
  3. ↑ Bearing in mind the timeline here, Kane and Willoughby obviously wouldn't have read Cofnas's critiques by that point.

References

  1. ↑ Willoughby, Emily: LC Name Authority File (Library of Congress).
  2. ↑ As a fiscally conservative but not terribly socially conservative person, I absolutely feel your frustration, Furrtil. I would love to see a libertarian in office one of these days… by Ferahgo the Assassin (April 16th, 2012, 01:29 PM) The Long Patrol Forums.
  3. ↑ Emily Willoughby Quillette.
  4. ↑ Emily Willoughby (October 28, 2017). "The Compassionate Way to Combat Creationism". Quillette.
  5. ↑ By now a lot of you are aware, but for anyone in the dark, paleoartist Emily Willoughby is involved in “research” that is directly tied to eugenics, racism, and classism. She also believes, or is at least indifferent to, the myth that intelligence has a racial component. by @Prehistorica_CM (8:01 PM · Aug 11, 2022) Twitter (archived from August 20, 2022).
  6. ↑ This is the type of research that incarcerates Black people, as early as elementary school, setting them up for the school to prison pipeline. This is ultimately a major component of White Supremacy at a basic level by Midiaou Diallo (@Midiaou7) (9:55 PM · Aug 11, 2022) Twitter (archived from August 11, 2022).
  7. ↑ Huh, how about that (some context on ISIR https://newstatesman.com/politics/2018/02/it-might-be-pseudo-science-students-take-threat-eugenics-seriously) by @thebirdmaniac (4:04 PM · Aug 13, 2022) Twitter (archived from August 25, 2022).
  8. ↑ Exactly! This kind if stupid, kindergarten dog-piling behavior, devoid of any nuance is the reason people lost their jobs or life in the past. The pressure the community creates right now is overwhelming. I will not cut all ties based on accusations that are still being tested. … by Joschua Knüppe (August 13, 2022) Twitter (archived from August 20, 2012).
  9. ↑ The two of them were pushing race and IQ "science" on Wikipedia for years, both being banned for doing so incessantly and deceptively. by Magnus Pharao (August 12, 2022) Twitter (archived from August 23, 2022).
  10. ↑ Motion: Ferahgo the Assassin editing restrictions modified (September 2016)] (02:43, 1 September 2016 UTC) Wikipedia.
  11. ↑ Over recent days, palaeoartist Emily Willoughby has been accused of being associated with race science and its attendant political positions. For that reason I cannot, from hereon, have any association with Emily or her work. I will not be engaging in discussion on this matter. by Darren Naish (@TetZoo) (9:10 AM · Aug 17, 2022) Twitter (archived from November 8, 2022).
  12. ↑ Whatever validity there is to the Emily Willoughby allegations, they are no excuse for bullying and personal attacks. I'm shocked at how savage some of these have been, and they have totally derailed any conversation that might be warranted about her research or views. by @MarkWitton (August 12, 2022) Twitter (archived from 25 Aug 2022 19:45:03 UTC).
  13. ↑ I am not (and likely will not be for a bit) in the position to commission paleo art, but Emily Willoughby's work will no longer be featured in any lectures I give or classes I teach going forward. There is no excuse for what is a fairly consistent history of questionable work. by Dr. Lisa Buckley (@Lisavipes) Twitter (archived from August 17, 2022).
  14. ↑ ignorant and misguided demonization of a behavior geneticist (August 17, 2022) Why Evolution is True.
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 ISIR Board Members. isironline.org.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 International Society for Intelligence Research 2019 Annual Conference. isironline.org.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 International Society for Intelligence Research 2021 Annual Conference. isironline.org.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 International Society for Intelligence Research 2022 Annual Conference.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 International Society for Intelligence Research 2023 Annual Conference. isironline.org.
  20. ↑ University of Minnesota: Emily Willoughby.
  21. ↑ About (emilywilloughby.com).
  22. ↑ Emily Willoughby LinkedIn.
  23. ↑ Emily A. Willoughby Google Scholar.
  24. ↑ God's Word or Human Reason? An Inside Perspective on Creationism by Jonathan Kane, Emily Willoughby & T. Michael Keesey (2017) Inkwater Press. ISBN 1629013722. edition.
  25. ↑ God's Word or Human Reason? An Inside Perspective on Creationism by Jonathan Kane & Emily Willoughby (2020) Inkwater Press. ISBN 1629016381. 2nd edition.
  26. ↑ Review: Jonathan Kane, Emily Willoughby and T. Michael Keese, God’s Word or Human Reason? An Inside Perspective on Creationism by Stefaan Blanck (2017) Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4.2:283-285. doi:10.1558/jch.37809.
  27. ↑ Book Review: God’s Word or Human Reason? by Steven Spence (February 14, 2017) Science Connected Magazine.
  28. ↑ Book Review: God's Word or Human Reason? An Inside Perspective on Creationism: The claims of young-Earth creationists are easily checked and easily countered. And a new book—written by former creationists themselves—does this in substantive, compelling detail… by Darren Naish (March 25, 2018) Tetrapod Zoology, Scientific American
  29. ↑ Ferahgo the Assassin, DeviantArt (archived webpages).
  30. ↑ EWilloughby DeviantArt.
  31. ↑ CV/Publications Emily Willoughby.
  32. ↑ Drawing and Painting Dinosaurs: Using Art and Science to Bring the Past to Life by Emily Willoughby (2021) The Crowood Press. ISBN 1785009559.
  33. ↑ Book review – Drawing and Painting Dinosaurs: Using Art and Science to Bring the Past to Life by Leon Vlieger (February 17, 2022) The Inquisitive Biologist.
  34. ↑ An interview with Emily Willoughby, author and artist of Drawing and Painting Dinosaurs (16 December 2021) Mark P. Witton's Blog.
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 "The Institute of Mental Chronometry gives money to its gang members - and the University of Minnesota is so proud" - Pinkerite. Published August 24th, 2023.
  36. ↑ (August 17, 2023). "Lee and Willoughby Awarded Grant to Explore Cognitive Ability through Innovative Research". University of Minnesota.
  37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 37.2 Reviewing A Troublesome Inheritance by Emily Willoughby and Jonathan Kane (May 16, 2014, 9:08:29 PM) DeviantArt (archived from 29 Mar 2020 16:52:42 UTC).
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 Maybe, but Emily Willoughby & her associate Jonathan Kane seem *very* sympathetic to "HBD" aka scientific racism. Excerpt from their review of Nicholas Wade's book. by Cathryn Townsend (5:24 AM · Aug 12, 2022) Twitter (archived from 12 Aug 2022 15:40:10 UTC).
  39. ↑ Simon Whitten (July 9, 2019). "Has Stephen Jay Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man really been discredited?". Medium.
  40. ↑ "Henry Harpending". Southern Poverty Law Center.
  41. ↑ Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy: A Critical Analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s Theory by Nathan Cofnas (2018) Human Nature 29:134-156. doi:10.1007/s12110-018-9310-x.
  42. ↑ Is Kevin MacDonald’s Theory of Judaism “Plausible”? A Response to Dutton (2018) by Nathan Cofnas (2019) Evolutionary Psychological Science 5:143-150. doi:10.1017/S0021932005027069.
  43. ↑ Ten researchers reveal the smartest person they've EVER met!. Aporia Magazine.
  44. ↑ Are we really getting smarter?. Aporia Magazine.
Retrieved from "https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Emily_Willoughby&oldid=2702127"