There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/House of Commons
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
House of Commons | Result: ?[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Is crappy semi-stub which isn't either missional or really needed. Our efforts should be concentrated on more worthy articles. KarmaPolice (talk) 21:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 'noted MPs' - david trednnick. expenses scandal where we even say people were convicted, jacqui smith was not one of them, and not even one of the most egregious of the legal but frivilous expense claims (duck house anyone?). i said on the lords afd, strange choices. or other wise dross that we hamstring ourselves if we try to improve what we have rather than the free reign of deleting and starting from scratch. AMassiveGay (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- A cursory reading proved the article to have some inaccuracies. Other, actual controversies aren't really covered at all. Delete. Lucern99 (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Yeah, also looks fine to me. I think it's very good to have a large encyclopedia, especially one full of content that we cannot possibly be sued over lol. Harmless enough. KaDaShOvA (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kadashova RationalWiki is not an encyclopedia, so I don't think this is particularly good of a reason to keep it. — LunaAHHHHH 18:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- I am also going to argue that it is not 'harmless enough' because it is so fact-light it is basically useless. KarmaPolice (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Kadashova RationalWiki is not an encyclopedia, so I don't think this is particularly good of a reason to keep it. — LunaAHHHHH 18:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Plutocow (talk) 20:32, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. I don't get it. Totemtrained (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- Create a UK Parliament page, merge into that. United States Congress is missional, so I think UK Parliament is too.
DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW
dictatormoderator 03:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC) - Carthage (talk) 06:26, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- DM is right. Spud (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- ミ★ LunaAHHHHH 04:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not quite deletable imo, some stuff can be salvaged. EditorialMaster (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- Good arguments, good arguments. In both deletion discussions. Maybe a redirect is enough. ☣🍆☣ (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- The obvious choice given the arguments above. 👁️4️⃣🔎 (talk) 08:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)