There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Moderator elections/Nominations/Archive9
Election of December 2016: Nominations
We will be electing 6 moderators and 2 alternates via Single Transferable Vote. The mods are the 1st-6th highest-ranked candidates of the STV vote. The alternates are the 7th and 8th highest-ranked candidates of the STV vote.
We would like to have at least 1 non-candidate OpenSTV reader. It's really easy -- you need only dedicate 1 hour of time on 07/08 January 2017.
Nominations[edit]
Accepted nominations[edit]
- I humbly accept the nomination and intend to serve the community well — Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 04:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Accept — Applesauce (talk) 06:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- I Accept. — Bongolian (talk) 03:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I accept —CheeseburgerPlate
(talk • stalk) 05:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Accept— David Gerard
- I accept — DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 04:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Accept — FuzzyCatPotato
- Tentatively accept — I intend to do nothing and hope to remove my name from this list but given the inauspicious start above, and the fact that we don't include a "none of the above" in the list... — Hipocrite (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'm obligated to accept as I nominated myself — 'Legionwhat do you want from me 08:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- I humbly accept my nomination. — Pbfreespace3
- Okay — Weaseloid
- Accept, because why not. — Zero (talk - contributions) 18:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Accept, let's do it! Rational1 (talk) 16:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Reluctantly accept. CorruptUser (talk) 18:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Fuck it; I'll enter the race at the last minute — since we're electing 2 alternative moderators as well, I might as well try to rank among those. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Declined nominations[edit]
- don't really care that much anymore. — Bicyclewheel
19:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'm honored, but I'd rather not. — Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 10:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not really here anymore. Thanks but no thanks. —
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Having thought matters over, I've decided not to run for reelection as I'm not sure that I have time enough to follow RW with the frequency that I think a mod should. — ScepticWombat (talk) 08:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have beebn thinking about it and I have decided to decline as I don't think I would do a good job.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 20:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not active. It's sheer coincidence I even saw the nomination. Carpetsmoker (talk) 12:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Other[edit]
OpenSTV operators[edit]
Please please please sign up. Cherry on top and all that jazz. Your name will be remembered in history. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 04:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
- This discussion was moved to RationalWiki talk:Techs.