User talk:Centimeter/Archive1

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Centimeter! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Turn to me if you want to ask anything. I'm the main administrator here. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 19:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Right...--Centimeter (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Hang on a second, pal. There's only one Main Administrator around here and that's me. Git yer ass to the back of the line, n00b! DickTurpis (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

What? What? I though I was the Main Administrator!! insolent liberals!--Centimeter (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Sysop

Congratulations on becoming a sysop, Centimeter! You have been sysopped because you exemplify those fine qualities we value in sysops: being alive and breathing, being carbon-based, and not being a vandal! : )

Here is your bucket, mop, and instruction manual. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

RA YUO CARBON FACIST!!1 - David Gerard (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

That's "YOU", Mr. Gerard. If you're going to call me a fascist do it properly : ) Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Ohhhh I can't resist a challenge. RA, you are a fucking fascist.

Hows that? Ace^X-102 21:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Good, but you forgot to sign it as MC : ) Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

You are a total fascist, go out and get a blow job you obese little wanker. 86.12.whatever.

Better? Ace^X-102 21:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. I'm so insulted that I'll go voice my support for rangeblocks and checkuser now. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

I just wanted to thank you for starting ethical egoism. Ages ago, I linked it and planned to (eventually) do it myself, so I actually feel grateful to you. (And a bit jealous of you for having the self-discipline to do the hard part of wiki-editing—actually writing articles. Unlike me, who couldn't be arsed to do it himself.) So thanks! Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Glad my work is being noticed, RA! I am going to create an article on deontological ethics (the philosophy of choice for those conservatives willing to actually think about it) in a day or two unless someone else does (which isn't very likely). For now, though, I will just make a stub to work with.--Centimeter_INCHES 02:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

I came here to say virtually the same thing about your contributions on ethics in general. I intended to start on deontological ethics some time after writing the consequentialism article. You saved me the hassle, thanks! I also had it in mind to write one on the categorical imperative, so a double thanks for that :D. --Danfly (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Happy to have helped out here a bit.--Centimeter_INCHES 18:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

What the hell

...are you doing? - π 02:19, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I was just thinking that myself? Hiding the deletion logs? It's all a bit conservapedian for me... DeltaStar_{Senior Sysop}^{Speciationspeed!} 02:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Whoa now, let's not get all Godwin-ish. Judging by the logs, it seems to be a minor privacy issue. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 02:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I suppose - don't we have a _____'s law for saying "It's just like conservapedia here" - Earthland's law or summat? DeltaStar_{Senior Sysop}^{Speciationspeed!} 02:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I forget whether we came up with a real term for it. It tends to be cited by people who dislike RW anyway, so maybe it hasn't caught on as such. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 02:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I see by the bright goldenrod bar on the top of my otherwise white screen that I have new messages, as Ken would say. As Kupochama said, it's a minor privacy issue. It probably looked all weird because I have never done this before, and I messed everything up and had to fix it. Sorry to have shocked anyone, but I am quite sure that nobody really needs to see that. No cloak-and-daggers conspiracy.--Centimeter_INCHES 02:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Earthland... is that User:Earthland or someone else?--Centimeter_INCHES 02:44, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Correct, though like I said, I can't quite remember whether he was big on the "RW=CP" argument. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 10:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Sir!

Check your emails. 00:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

For what?--— cm² — 01:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh, don't tell me you didn't get my response... I've been having that problem a lot. A few people don't receive reply's from me when sending mail via rational wiki. Probably some stupid error on the part of Gmail. The gist of what I said was no, I don't live in the Chicago.--— cm² — 01:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC)