There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| Christ died so we may|
write articles about
|A multi-chef broth|
|Devil's in the details|
|The pearly gates|
The Holy Lance, Holy Spear, Spear of Longinus, or Spear of Destiny is an alleged relic from the crucifixion of Jesus: a spear used to puncture his torso to determine that he was dead. It makes its brief appearance in the Bible at John 19:34:
“”But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.
None of the synoptic gospels mention this incident. But, as with the True Cross, the many nails apparently needed to crucify Jesus, and just about any artifact mentioned in the several accounts of Christ's passion, it was miraculously multiplied by the medieval relic industry.
"Longinus" is a name given by Christian folklore to the soldier who wielded the lance. He appears first sometime around the middle of the fourth century in the apocryphal Gospel of Nicodemus, although he really isn't given a speaking role there either:
“”Then Longinus, a certain soldier, taking a spear, pierced his side, and presently there came forth blood and water.
Other Christian folklore identifies Longinus with the unnamed soldier who says "Truly this man was the son of God", so the legend of "Saint Longinus" was started. Longinus probably was named after the Greek word for spear used in the text, λόγχῃ (lonchē), also cognate with Latin lancea and English lance.
Rome is home to one such Holy Lance. This one is at least reported since around 570 CE, if you believe the report of Antoninus of Piacenza that he saw both the lance and the crown of thorns preserved in Jerusalem. This one has a complicated history. It was captured by the king of Persia, then sent to Constantinople, and then captured by the Turks at the fall of the city. It was ultimately given as a bribe by the Ottoman Caliph Bayezid II to Pope Innocent VIII because the Pope had Bayezid's brother prisoner and Bayezid was best pleased that he be kept that way. This version is now in Rome.
Another relic claiming to be the Holy Lance is preserved in Echmiadzin, Armenia. This one has been reworked to form a cross. It's attested from the 13th century forward.
Yet another was recovered during the 11th century siege of Antioch during the First Crusade, in which a vision came to one Peter Bartholemew telling him where to look. Its discovery rallied the Crusaders and enabled them to break the siege.
The Vienna lance
None of these other Holy Lances are the Holy Lance. The Holy Lance that everybody makes a fuss over is the one kept in Vienna, where it formed part of the regalia of the Holy Roman and Austro-Hungarian Empires. This one appeared first at the coronation of Emperor Otto I in the late 10th century. The Roman emperor Constantine I is supposed to have owned it earlier, and Constantine also bound a nail from the Crucifixion in it. Later Holy Roman Emperors had a silver sheath attached to better bind the nail to it, and then a gold sheath to attach the silver sheath better.
Metallurgical tests performed on this lance suggest that it dates to the 7th century CE. This has fueled speculation that this lance was once the lance of the Lombard kings, and represented Odin's spear Gungnir. Charlemagne may have converted Odin's spear into a Christian relic when he was crowned king of the Lombards in 774.
Its magical powers
No particular healing legends or other powers were ascribed to this relic, which rather served as a symbol of imperial power among the German and Austrian emperors. It acquired them in much later, and post-Christian, folklore.
The Holy Lance, as an occult relic, figures in the plot of Richard Wagner's Parsifal, which is ultimately based on a poem by the 13th century Minnesinger Wolfram von Eschenbach.
In the opera, King Amfortas (based off of the Fisher King of Arthurian lore) has been wounded by the Lance, resulting in a magical wound that will not heal. The lance is then stolen by the evil wizard Klingsor, and it of course becomes the task of the titular hero Parsifal (Sir Percival, from Arthurian legends) to go on a quest to fetch it back. After the typical travails involving seductive flower maidens, dead swans, and mysterious hermits, Parsifal succeeds in recovering the Lance. When he touches Amfortas, he is both healed of his wound and absolved of his sins.
Nietzsche absolutely hated this; Wagner's use of Christian symbols and values was something he considered a betrayal:
“”Parsifal is a work of perfidy, of vindictiveness, of a secret attempt to poison the presuppositions of life — a bad work. The preaching of chastity remains an incitement to anti-nature: I despise everyone who does not experience Parsifal as an attempted assassination of basic ethics.
|—Nietzsche Against Wagner|
Others have asserted that the opera ties into Wagner's anti-Semitism and that the villain Klingsor is a Jewish caricature. These claims also seem rather far-fetched; nothing in the libretto itself directly supports them. The Christian and un-Teutonic themes in Parsifal allegedly also made it Hitler's least favorite among Wagner's operas. The opera, which was by Wagner's intention only supposed to be performed at Bayreuth, was not performed there during the Nazi regime, though it was staged at Berlin.
On the other hand, some people make Hitler obsessed with the lance. This is somewhat common, despite him being one of the few of the Nazi leadership not obsessed with the occult and Ariosophy.
The Spear of Destiny
Trevor Ravenscroft's 1973 book The Spear of Destiny placed the Holy Lance in a New Age conspiracy theory. This theory gives mysterious powers that supposedly come with possession of the lance. Hitler, according to Ravenscroft, was obsessed with the lance, and the actual point of World War II was to enable Hitler to capture it.
Losing the lance, however, results in the downfall of the former owner. Ravenscroft asserts that Hitler fell as a result of losing the lance. Later, the lance allegedly came into the possession of American General George S. Patton after the end of the war. His death following an automobile accident was the result of giving away the lance, having returned it and the rest of the Imperial Regalia to Austria.
According to Ravenscroft, the lance is actually an unholy lance, and serves a malevolent spirit (spirits?) who may be the Antichrist, though Ravenscroft dances around the issue rather daintily. In other sources such as the Theosophist Alice Bailey, this idea is linked with the Theosophist belief that the Antichrist is not a person but forces of destruction that occasionally manifest to fuck shit up for the evulz.
The spear in Antarctica
Dr. Howard Buechner, a medical professor at Tulane, builds on Ravenscroft's themes with his two books on the lance, Adolf Hitler And The Secrets Of The Holy Lance and Hitler's Ashes — Seeds Of A New Reich.
Buechner claimed to have been contacted by a U-Boat captain, who affirmed that the Lance in Vienna was a fake. As to where the Spear actually was? Why, spirited away with other Nazi treasures by U-Boat to Antarctica along with a mountain of Nazi gold, of course! Afterwards, the Spear was supposedly recovered (improbably enough) by a Nazi secret society and hidden away in Europe somewhere.
- Gospel of Nicodemus, ch. 7.
- Matthew 27:34
- Eamon Duffy, (2006). Saints & Sinners – A History of the Popes., p. 196. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-11597-0.
- The Holy Lance, The Catholic Encyclopedia
- Steven Runciman (1987). A History of the Crusades, Volume 1: The First Crusade and the Foundation of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Cambridge University Press. pp. 241–245. ISBN 978-0-521-34770-9.
- It appears duct tape had not yet been invented.
- Maryann Bird (2003), "Piercing An Ancient Tale", Time, June 08, 2003
- He appears not to have realized that it was sharp.
- Bryan Magee (2002). The Tristan Chord. Owl Books, NY. ISBN 0-8050-7189-X. pages 371-380.
- Frederic Spotts (1994). Bayreuth: A History of the Wagner Festival. New Haven and London: Yale University Press ISBN 0-300-05777-6. page 212.
- Weiser Books. ISBN 0-87728-547-0.
- Thunderbird Press, 1988 and 1989 respectively