RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Draft:Schizoids.net
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Draft:Schizoids.net | Result: Burned with napalm fire
Delete
- Not notable. Draft created by user Critical Rationalist solely due to a grudge. 80.43.34.98 (talk) 12:33, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Aside from being motivated by personal grievances, the author also has a storied history of either poor reading comprehension or intentional misrepresentations of people's stated views; should not be considered a reliable narrator. FemtwinkDreamboat (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Going by the, erm, colorful ranting Critical Rationalist is engaging in, I'm inclined to agree with that assessment. However, the page itself seems to be on-mission, so I'm not sure if deleting it is the right way to go. Luigifan18 (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Aside from being motivated by personal grievances, the author also has a storied history of either poor reading comprehension or intentional misrepresentations of people's stated views; should not be considered a reliable narrator. FemtwinkDreamboat (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Kill it with fire --Goatspeed. Stalk meCircularR
asoningMy experiments 15:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC) - Unnecessary drama boiling over from an obscure forum that no one appears to give a shit about except for the people who participate there. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 17:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Arcadium Trancefer (talk) 17:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- ApooftGnegiol (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, and Critical Rationalist deserves at least a slap on the face for using this site to advance offsite drama. Plutocow (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I deserve kudos for having exposed a nutty echochamber.Critical Rationalist (talk)!
- Lacks notability. Bongolian (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I just saw Critical Rationality's latest tirade on their talk page, and I feel like I have little choice but to say screw this noise, it was not written in good faith. It's rare that I vote to delete something, but I'm getting sick of this crap. Luigifan18 (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep
- Merely a draft, not in mainspace. Some Putinist COVID-denialist pseudoscientific Trump-bots got angry.Critical Rationalist (talk) 13:16, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- There it is again. The kitchen sink of pejoratives you throw at anyone you take a dislike to for whatever reason. I wonder, I really do, how it is that you made yourself so unpopular on schizoids.net.80.43.34.98 (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- No-one cares you about your Trumpist, Putin-wiorshipping, Covid-denialist echochamber, you dumb cunt. I bet all men with reason would be "unpopular" there. Critical Rationalist (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)!~
- If no one cares about this alleged echo chamber, then why did you go to the trouble of drafting an article about it? You would still be a member if you'd behaved like a reasonable human being. I gave you so much advice and you ignored all of it. I told you: listen to what people are actually saying; don't straw man and lie about everyone; don't make ad hominem and vicious insults a first resort; don't project your own flaws onto others. You just could not change, and now here you are. Good luck in your future endeavours. I hope you learn to listen as much as you talk.80.43.34.98 (talk) 14:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Stick yo your Putin-Nazi [1] woshipping echochambers, losers. No-one in the world at large cares about you, dwelllers of the Plato's Cave, idiots, we merely laugh you. And we do so brutally. Critical Rationalist (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- We are very grateful that you are so openly displaying the reasons for your involuntary departure from schizoids.net. No need to add anything really, it speaks for itself. FemtwinkDreamboat (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I can kill you anywhhere in mainstream spaes.If it is war that you want, then war you shall get get.You COVID denialist Putinbots will get a war anywhere.Critical Rationalist (talk) 15:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)!
- You're not helping your case. Luigifan18 (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I can kill you anywhhere in mainstream spaes.If it is war that you want, then war you shall get get.You COVID denialist Putinbots will get a war anywhere.Critical Rationalist (talk) 15:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)!
- We are very grateful that you are so openly displaying the reasons for your involuntary departure from schizoids.net. No need to add anything really, it speaks for itself. FemtwinkDreamboat (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Stick yo your Putin-Nazi [1] woshipping echochambers, losers. No-one in the world at large cares about you, dwelllers of the Plato's Cave, idiots, we merely laugh you. And we do so brutally. Critical Rationalist (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- If no one cares about this alleged echo chamber, then why did you go to the trouble of drafting an article about it? You would still be a member if you'd behaved like a reasonable human being. I gave you so much advice and you ignored all of it. I told you: listen to what people are actually saying; don't straw man and lie about everyone; don't make ad hominem and vicious insults a first resort; don't project your own flaws onto others. You just could not change, and now here you are. Good luck in your future endeavours. I hope you learn to listen as much as you talk.80.43.34.98 (talk) 14:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- No-one cares you about your Trumpist, Putin-wiorshipping, Covid-denialist echochamber, you dumb cunt. I bet all men with reason would be "unpopular" there. Critical Rationalist (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)!~
- There it is again. The kitchen sink of pejoratives you throw at anyone you take a dislike to for whatever reason. I wonder, I really do, how it is that you made yourself so unpopular on schizoids.net.80.43.34.98 (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
#This is a very tentative keep vote, on account of the website as described being missional. On the other hand, the author is clearly a raving loon who appears to just be ranting and sharpening an axe, which makes me wonder if the page was created in bad faith. Luigifan18 (talk) 16:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Faith is irrelevant. We either want to mock 9/11 denialists and covid denialists and Putinbots, or we don't.Wikipedia asssumes good faith, we dont't. Critical Rationalist (talk) 16:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, we do assume good-faith. Please, check RationalWiki:Community Standards. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 16:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Assuming good faith is one of the only reasons why I voted to keep this (the other being RationalWiki's mission). I will rescind that vote if Critical Rationalist gives me good reason to doubt that assumption of good faith. As is, I'm already teetering on the edge after their ad hominem attacks and macho-violent-strongman posturing. Luigifan18 (talk) 16:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Putin-worshipping sociopaths deserve no good faith is all I can say [2].Critical Rationalist (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- And my keep vote is gone, along with my patience. Flinging verbal abuse is no way to win friends. Or arguments. Luigifan18 (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Putin-worshipping sociopaths deserve no good faith is all I can say [2].Critical Rationalist (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Assuming good faith is one of the only reasons why I voted to keep this (the other being RationalWiki's mission). I will rescind that vote if Critical Rationalist gives me good reason to doubt that assumption of good faith. As is, I'm already teetering on the edge after their ad hominem attacks and macho-violent-strongman posturing. Luigifan18 (talk) 16:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, we do assume good-faith. Please, check RationalWiki:Community Standards. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 16:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Faith is irrelevant. We either want to mock 9/11 denialists and covid denialists and Putinbots, or we don't.Wikipedia asssumes good faith, we dont't. Critical Rationalist (talk) 16:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Merge/redirect
Goat
- This whole fucking thing is phenomenally stupid. Carthage (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's like watching 2 kids fighting over a toy... Arcadium Trancefer (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is the sort of moment that makes me glad for not being a moderator anymore. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 16:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Do you think this might be ATIM-worthy? Luigifan18 (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is so mind-numbingly stupid that moving it to ATIM would be a stupendous waste of time, and also, giving unnecessary oxygen to a flamewar that is best done elsewhere. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 17:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree now. It's an idiot echochamber with 8 regulars and deserves no mention in the free world mainstream. The site is whimsical for its nuttyness, but there are subreddits with more regulars equally dumb and nuttyy. Critical Rationalist (talk) 17:15, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- The one thing that may speak for ATIM, or instead simply a shorter block as this seems straightforward, is that "Critical Rationalist" has gone after the IP and user and taunting them on their talk pages. I deleted the taunts at Talk:FemtwinkDreamboat, I'd advise not adding any more. --ApooftGnegiol (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I gave a nine hour block for the user's general debauchery. If this behavior continues, it can go to ATIM. Plutocow (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Aaaand they just attacked you and the entire website on their talk page. Le sigh. Luigifan18 (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I gave a nine hour block for the user's general debauchery. If this behavior continues, it can go to ATIM. Plutocow (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- The one thing that may speak for ATIM, or instead simply a shorter block as this seems straightforward, is that "Critical Rationalist" has gone after the IP and user and taunting them on their talk pages. I deleted the taunts at Talk:FemtwinkDreamboat, I'd advise not adding any more. --ApooftGnegiol (talk) 18:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree now. It's an idiot echochamber with 8 regulars and deserves no mention in the free world mainstream. The site is whimsical for its nuttyness, but there are subreddits with more regulars equally dumb and nuttyy. Critical Rationalist (talk) 17:15, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is so mind-numbingly stupid that moving it to ATIM would be a stupendous waste of time, and also, giving unnecessary oxygen to a flamewar that is best done elsewhere. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 17:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Do you think this might be ATIM-worthy? Luigifan18 (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)